Background and Objectives: The epidemiological data regarding mortality rates of adults with sarcoidosis and non-ischemic cardiovascular disease (CVD) are limited. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted to identify trends and disparities related to sarcoidosis and non-ischemic cardiovascular disease mortality among the adult US population from 1999 to 2022. Methods: We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WONDER database to extract death certificate data for the adult US population (≥25 years). The age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons were calculated, and annual percent changes (APCs) were determined using Joinpoint. Results: Between 1999 and 2022, 23,642 deaths were identified related to non-ischemic CVD + sarcoidosis. The overall AAMR increased from 0.2 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.3) in 1999 to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.6) in 2022. Females had a higher AAMR than males (0.6 vs. 0.5). Non-Hispanic (NH) blacks had the highest AAMR, followed by NH whites and Hispanic or Latinos. The southern region had the highest AAMR (0.7: 95% CI, 0.6–0.7), followed by the Midwest (0.6, 95% CI, 0.54–0.669), the Northeast (0.5, 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.6), and the West (0.4; 95% CI, 0.3–0.4). Urban and rural areas had comparable mortality rates (0.5 vs. 0.6). People aged 65+ had the highest AAMRs. Conclusions: The overall mortality rates for non-ischemic CVD and sarcoidosis have increased in the US from 1999 to 2022. Females and NH blacks had higher AAMRs, while a minimal variation was observed based on geographical regions. Early diagnosis and prompt management are the keys to reducing the mortality burden of non-ischemic CVD plus sarcoidosis.

Background/Objectives: Few studies have analyzed in-hospital complications and events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures for patients who underwent these interventions for single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aims to compare the outcomes of PCI and CABG in such patients using a large propensity-matched real-world database based on procedural codes. Methods: Adult patients receiving PCI or CABG for single-vessel CAD were identified from the 2016–2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Any cases targeting multi-vessel disease or employing a multi-treatment approach were excluded using appropriate procedural codes. Differences in events and complications from admission to discharge were studied between the two procedures (PCI vs. CABG) via logistic regression analysis. Results: After propensity matching with 273,380 patients in both groups, complication risks such as cardiac tamponade (aOR: 3.6 [3.27–3.96]), acute kidney injury (aOR: 1.53 [1.51–1.56]), cardiogenic shock (aOR: 1.38 [1.34–1.40]), procedural bleeding (aOR: 1.75 [1.67–1.83]), acute ischemic stroke (aOR: 1.89 [1.80–1.97]), and all-cause mortality (aOR: 1.05 [1.02–1.08]) were higher among CABG patients. No differences were observed for events of cardiac perforation (aOR: 0.92, [0.84–1.01]). Conclusions: In this large real-world propensity-matched analysis, CABG was associated with higher risks of multiple in-hospital complications and all-cause mortality compared to PCI following a single-vessel coronary intervention.

Background: Studies have shown that dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is superior to aspirin monotherapy in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attacks. However, there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of DAPT in mild-to-moderate stroke. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception till March 2024 for published randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate stroke. R version 4.3.2 was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: A total of 4 studies reporting data for 15,173 patients were included. DAPT was associated with a non-significant trend of reduced risk of early neurological deterioration (END) (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.28–1.05, P = .07) and recurrent ischemic stroke (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.41–1.04, P = .07). The risk of recurrent hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.47–1.86, P = .86), all-cause death (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52–1.08), or myocardial infarction (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.45–1.54) was comparable across the two groups. DAPT was not associated with an increased risk of any bleeding event (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.36–1.36). Conclusion: DAPT demonstrated a non-significant trend toward reduced risk of END and recurrent ischemic stroke without increasing the risk of bleeding events compared to aspirin monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate stroke. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these potential benefits.

Background: The highly arrhythmogenic nature of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) leads to high morbidity and mortality, the rates of which may be higher in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of CS patients admitted to hospitals with COVID-19. Methods: The study utilised the 2020–2021 National Inpatient Sample database, examining primary COVID-19 cases in adults aged older than or equal to 18 years. Those with CS were identified using ICD-10 code “D86.85” and compared with and without propensity matching (1:10) to those without CS for baseline characteristics and primary outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI), use of mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest and mortality. Results: In total, 2 543 912 COVID-19 cases were identified. Before propensity matching, CS patients were more likely to be younger (58.0 vs. 64.0 years, P<0.01), male (64.0% vs. 52.6%, P=0.011), of Black ethnicity (60.0% vs. 15.9%, P<0.01), exhibit higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores (3.00 vs. 1.00, P<0.01) and had a higher incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (aOR 2.649, 95% CI 1.366–5.134, P=0.004). After propensity matching (CS, N=95; non-CS, N=875), those with CS were at a statistically significant reduced risk of AKI (aOR 0.484, P=0.01); however, the outcomes of death, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, length of stay (LOS) and healthcare costs did not reach significance. Conclusion: In a propensity-matched cohort admitted with COVID-19, CS patients had a reduced risk of AKI, but comparable LOS, rates of cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilator use, and mortality. Future research is warranted to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing COVID-19 in patients with CS.