Background/Objectives: Spino-plastic surgery describes a specialized, multidisciplinary approach to addressing various spinal pathologies. The field is the innovative product of a multidisciplinary collaboration between plastic and reconstructive, orthopedic, and neurosurgery. Over the last few decades, this collaboration has borne promising surgical techniques and treatment plans geared toward restoring form, function, and aesthetics in patients with a variety of spinal conditions, including failed fusions, pseudoarthrosis, and the need for oncologic reconstruction. This paper explores the application of spino-plastic surgery in the context of post-sarcoma resection reconstructions, focusing on the efficacy in addressing the unique challenges posed by extensive tissue loss and structural deformities. Methods: Our study reviews a series of cases wherein spino-plastic techniques were utilized in patients with sarcomas of the spine and adjacent structures. We also discuss the technical considerations, including preoperative planning, intraoperative challenges, and overall patient care, that are crucial for the success of spino-plastic procedures. Results: The outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in patient mobility, pain reduction, and overall quality of life. Most notably, spino-plastic surgical techniques help facilitate the restoration of functional anatomy by leveraging vascularized bone grafts and muscle flaps, thereby enhancing long-term stability and reducing the risk of complications such as nonunion or infection. Conclusions: Spino-plastic collaboration represents a pivotal advancement in oncologic treatment, spinal care, and reconstructive surgery, offering new hope for patients undergoing post-sarcoma reconstruction. Further research and refinement of the techniques will only expand their application and improve outcomes for a broader range of patients in the future.

Background/Objectives: Spinoplastic surgery is an emerging multidisciplinary field developed to address and reduce the complication of pseudoarthrosis following complex spinal reconstructions. While the number of spinal fusion procedures continues to rise every year, fusion failure rates remain as high as 40%. Although pseudoarthrosis may not always manifest clinically, it remains a leading cause of persistent pain and need for subsequent revision surgeries. The multidisciplinary collaboration between spine and plastic surgeons in spinoplastic surgery has therefore emerged as a proactive strategy aimed at preventing complications, particularly in patients identified as high-risk for pseudoarthrosis. As the patient population expands and spinoplastic surgery continues to evolve, refining patient selection criteria becomes essential for achieving optimal surgical outcomes. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in spinoplastic surgery, highlighting current indications, surgical techniques, recent case reports, and strategies for identifying suitable candidates. Methods: We performed a narrative review of English language literature through April 2025. Spinoplastic case reports and case series published within the last 20 years were included in the review. Results: Indications for use of a spinoplastic approach clustered into prior fusion failure, extensive oncologic resection, severe spinal deformity, procedures requiring extensive spinal involvement, and/or patients at risk for impaired bone healing. Succesful radiographic union and improvement of symptoms were widely reported across all 9 case reports/series. Conclusions: Although evidence is presently limited, spinoplastic surgery appears to achieve high bone graft fusion rates with acceptable morbidity and functional improvement in a carefully selected group of high-risk spinal reconstruction patients. Still, larger prospective studies are warranted to refine patient selection and validate functional benefit.

Robots have been used effectively in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) for reconstruction. The utilization of robotics in all surgical specialties is expanding with the goal of offering the most appropriate patient-centered care possible, especially in complex multidisciplinary cases. Despite the safety, efficiency, and reproducibility of robotics in PRS, there is a paucity of required and formalized training in PRS residency programs. The ACGME and industry published guidelines were investigated. Robotic surgery case logs of Mayo Clinic Arizona General Surgery residents were analyzed with attention to equivalency certification (EQ). Over the past 5 years, the equivalency certification from Intuitive (Sunnyvale, CA) was obtained by 30% of all general surgery residents at our institution (range, 0–100). The case numbers to obtain the equivalence certification are industry recommendations, and proficiency is determined by the program director. The ACGME does not mandate robotics training in general surgery residency. According to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), trainees must complete 20 console cases and 10 bedside cases to become industry certified. With respect to training and advancing the field, PRS residents could successfully obtain certification in their residency programs. The minimum case requirement recommended by SAGES is not burdensome and can ensure robotic privileges in PRS practice immediately following graduation. By improving the training for minimally invasive robotic surgery in plastic surgery, patients and healthcare systems benefit from improved quality of life outcomes and decreased postoperative length of stay, which results in less strain on our entire medical system.

Background: Rastafarianism maintains that cannabis is a sacred element of the religious practice, and followers of the religion traditionally engage cautiously with western medicine. This case involves Mr. I, a 72‐year‐old Rastafari male with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and hepatic decompensation, who developed delirium with psychotic features which were initially managed with quetiapine. His family expressed concerns with psychotropic medications and requested using dronabinol, a synthetic cannabinoid, to manage his symptoms considering the spiritual significance of cannabinoids in the Rastafari culture. The psychiatry team’s dissenting recommendations regarding dronabinol was met with resistance, and the family voiced that they felt their religious beliefs were not being respected and considered bringing in their own marijuana products. Following an ethics consultation, a compromise was reached to trial low‐dose dronabinol. However, Mr. I’s symptoms worsened, prompting discontinuation of dronabinol and management with olanzapine. Discussion: This case exemplifies the complexities of clinical care when religious beliefs conflict with medical necessity. We discuss the limited indications for dronabinol and potential adverse effects on delirium’s behavioral symptoms. Concerns about fungal sensitization from cannabinoid products in the context of immunosuppressive chemotherapy and the effects of cannabinoids on hepatic dysfunction are also explored. Moreover, we emphasize the importance of cultural sensitivity for Rastafari individuals who view marijuana as sacred and therapeutic. Balancing cultural and religious sensitivity with ethical, evidence‐based medicine through a thorough discussion of risks and benefits is essential for optimal decision‐making in such ethical dilemmas.