Background: Despite the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic melanoma, many patients fail to derive meaningful benefit, underscoring the urgent need for accessible prognostic biomarkers. The C-reactive protein (CRP)–albumin–lymphocyte (CALLY) index, an immunonutritional index, has shown prognostic value in various cancers. Previous studies indicate that systemic inflammation and nutritional status influence ICI efficacy, suggesting the potential relevance of the CALLY index in metastatic melanoma. This study evaluates the CALLY index’s role in metastatic melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Methods: This retrospective study analysed 92 patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy at Ege University’s Faculty of Medicine between 2015 and 2023. The CALLY index was calculated using the pre-treatment CRP, albumin and lymphocyte levels. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate survival outcomes, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were employed to identify independent prognostic factors. A predictive nomogram incorporating the CALLY index and other significant variables was then developed. Results: The optimal CALLY index cutoff was determined to be 2. Patients with a low CALLY index (≤ 2) had worse median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with those who had a high CALLY index (> 2) (median OS: 9.6 vs 31.3 months, p < 0.001; median PFS: 3.8 vs 10.6 months, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the CALLY index, lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥ 2, M1c/M1d staging and acral/mucosal melanoma subtypes to be independent predictors of OS. A nomogram was then constructed based on these factors, yielding a concordance index of 0.705 (95% confidence interval: 0.634–0.776). This model stratified patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, with the high-risk group showing significantly worse OS than the intermediate- and the low-risk groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The CALLY index is a cost-effective and independent prognostic biomarker that can aid in risk stratification and guide treatment decisions in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving anti-PD-1 therapy.

Background/Objectives: Nivolumab has been shown to be an effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, patient responses vary considerably. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the C-PLAN index in predicting survival outcomes for patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 81 mRCC patients previously treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors who subsequently received nivolumab. The C-PLAN index, which includes C-reactive protein, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, was used to classify patients into “good” and “poor” prognostic groups. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months. Patients in the “poor” C-PLAN group exhibited significantly shorter OS and PFS than those in the “good” group (median OS: 13 vs. 31 months, p = 0.003; median PFS: 3 vs. 10 months, p = 0.007). The C-PLAN index was identified as an independent predictor of both OS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11–3.43, p = 0.020) and PFS (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.04–2.78, p = 0.032) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the C-PLAN index may serve as a valuable prognostic tool, offering insights into survival outcomes for patients undergoing nivolumab therapy. Further prospective and multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the five-year survival rate for advanced melanoma. However, many patients exhibit resistance to ICI therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and prognostic factors of anti-PD-1 (Group A) and nivolumab–ipilimumab (Group B) therapy in patients with advanced melanoma who were resistant to prior ICI therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 56 patients with advanced melanoma who had previously shown resistance to ICI therapy. In the Group A (who have previously shown resistance to anti-CTLA-4, n = 28), the objective response rate (ORR) was 42.9%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 53%. In the Group B (previously shown resistance to anti-PD-1, n = 28), the ORR was 17.9%, and the DCR was 25%. The ORR was lower in two subgroups: patients who showed progression or relapse in the the initial radiological assessment of prior ICI therapy (ORR 10.5%) and patients who had previously received ICI in the adjuvant setting (ORR 8.3%). A Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score of 2–3 was a predictor of OS in both groups (Group A: HR 3.789, 95% CI 1.356–10.589, p = 0.011; Group B: HR 4.281, 95% CI 1.490–12.300, p = 0.007) and for PFS in the Group B (HR 3.167, 95% CI 1.062–9.442, p = 0.039). Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated efficacy following resistance to anti-CTLA-4, whereas combination ICI therapy showed lower response rates in patients resistant to anti-PD-1. Further studies are needed to confirm the RMH scores and other prognostic markers and to evaluate subgroups with lower efficacy of nivolumab-ipilimumab therapy.

Background/Objectives: In the REGOMA trial, regorafenib demonstrated an overall survival advantage over lomustine, and it has become a recommended treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in guidelines. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of regorafenib as a third-line treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who progressed while taking bevacizumab-based therapy. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study in Turkey included 65 patients treated between 2021 and 2023 across 19 oncology centers. The main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, progression after second-line bevacizumab-based treatment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≤2. Patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Results: The median age of the patients was 53 years (18–67 years), with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% Confidence Interval: 2.23–2.75) and a median overall survival of 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.52–4.68). The median overall survival was improved in patients who received subsequent therapy after regorafenib treatment compared with those who did not (p = 0.022). Progression-free survival was longer in patients with ECOG 0–1 than in those with ECOG 2 (p = 0.042). The safety profile was consistent with that of the REGOMA trial, with no drug-related deaths observed. Conclusions: Regorafenib shows good efficacy and safety as a third-line treatment for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab-based therapy. This study supports the use of regorafenib and emphasizes the need for further randomized studies to validate its role and optimize treatment strategies.

This study sought to translate and validate the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF) for use in assessing the FoP among Turkish cancer patients. A sample of 185 cancer patients who were undergoing active treatment at Ege University Oncology Clinic participated in this study. The FoP-Q-SF was translated into Turkish and its psychometric properties were assessed. The questionnaire’s reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega, while its validity was tested via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and correlation with established measures such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The FoP-Q-SF demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89, McDonald’s omega = 0.89) and a strong unidimensional structure based on CFA (CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.078, SRMR = 0.076). Significant correlations were found between the FoP-Q-SF scores and related anxiety measures, including the HADS-D, HADS-A and EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional and total scores (0.395–0.578, p < 0.01). The known-groups validity analysis revealed that the FoP-Q-SF scores were higher among female cancer patients (p < 0.001), which was consistent with the findings of previous studies, while no significant associations were observed with cancer patients’ age, marital status, perceived income, educational status or psychiatric history. The FoP-Q-SF is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the FoP among Turkish cancer patients, which renders it suitable for clinical and research applications in this population.