Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved cancer treatment, a substantial proportion of patients do not benefit from these therapies, revealing the crucial need to identify reliable biomarkers. Inflammatory markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C-reactive protein (CRP), may provide insights into treatment outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of multiple inflammatory markers in patients with cancer receiving ICI-based therapies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 226 patients treated with ICI-based therapies at a single center between 2012 and 2023. The inflammatory markers NLR, PIV, SII, SIRI, LDH, CRP, and albumin were assessed. Cut-off values were determined using maximally selected rank statistics, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results: High NLR, PIV, SII, SIRI, LDH, and CRP, as well as low albumin levels, were associated with worse OS and PFS (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, high CRP, LDH, NLR, PIV, and SII independently predicted worse OS. Conclusions: Our findings confirm the prognostic utility of several inflammatory biomarkers in patients with cancer receiving ICIs, highlighting their potential for treatment stratification. Further studies are necessary to standardize cut-off values and validate these findings across broader, more diverse populations.

Background/Objectives: Nivolumab has been shown to be an effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, patient responses vary considerably. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the C-PLAN index in predicting survival outcomes for patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 81 mRCC patients previously treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors who subsequently received nivolumab. The C-PLAN index, which includes C-reactive protein, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, was used to classify patients into “good” and “poor” prognostic groups. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months. Patients in the “poor” C-PLAN group exhibited significantly shorter OS and PFS than those in the “good” group (median OS: 13 vs. 31 months, p = 0.003; median PFS: 3 vs. 10 months, p = 0.007). The C-PLAN index was identified as an independent predictor of both OS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11–3.43, p = 0.020) and PFS (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.04–2.78, p = 0.032) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the C-PLAN index may serve as a valuable prognostic tool, offering insights into survival outcomes for patients undergoing nivolumab therapy. Further prospective and multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is described as the unexpected rapid growth of a tumour accompanied by a decline in performance status. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in advanced melanoma, HPD remains a significant challenge in a subset of patients. Although HPD has been extensively studied in various solid tumours, research specifically focusing on advanced melanoma remains limited. We analysed 158 advanced melanoma patients, with 66.5% (n = 105) receiving anti-PD-1 and 33.5% (n = 53) receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The median overall survival was 4.9 months for patients with HPD compared to 8.9 months for those with progressive disease without HPD (p = 0.014). Factors associated with HPD included liver metastasis (p = 0.002), three or more metastatic sites (p < 0.001), elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels (p = 0.004), and Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status ≥2 (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis identified the Royal Marsden Hospital score (HR 3.675, 95% CI: 1.166–11.580, p = 0.026) as an independent risk factor for HPD, with the MDA-ICI score also trending towards significance (HR 4.466, 95% CI: 0.947–21.061, p = 0.059). This study provides valuable insights into the frequency and factors associated with HPD in advanced melanoma patients treated with ICIs, highlighting the relevance of clinical markers and scoring systems in predicting HPD risk.