Known laparoscopic and robotic assisted approaches and techniques for the surgical management of urological malignant and benign diseases are commonly used around the World. During the global pandemic COVID-19, urology surgeons had to reorganize their daily surgical practice. A concern with the use of minimally invasive techniques arose due to a proposed risk of viral transmission of the coronavirus disease with the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Due to this, we reviewed the literature to evaluate the use of laparoscopy and robotics during the pandemic COVID-19. A literature review of viral transmission in surgery and of the available literature regarding the transmission of the COVID-19 virus was performed up to April 30, 2020. We additionally reviewed surgical society guidelines and recommendations regarding surgery during this pandemic. Few studies have been performed on viral transmission during surgery. No study has been made regarding this area during minimally invasive urology cases. To date there is no study that demonstrates or can suggest the ability for a virus to be transmitted during surgical treatment whether open, laparoscopic or robotic. There is no society consensus on restricting laparoscopic or robotic surgery. However, there is expert consensus on modification of standard practices to minimize any risk of transmission. During the pandemic COVID-19 we recommend the use of specific personal protective equipment for the surgeon, anesthesiologist and nursing staff in the operating room. Modifications of standard practices during minimally invasive surgery such as using lowest intra-abdominal pressures possible, controlled smoke evacuation systems, and minimizing energy device usage are recommended.

Background: The incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) after radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion (UD), the typical pathogens, and associated patient risk factors have not been well documented. In this study, we examined the incidence of post-op UTIs after RC to identify associated risk factors. Methods: Single-center, retrospective case series of 386 patients with bladder cancer who underwent RC with UD between 2012 and 2024. The primary objective was UTI incidence, defined by the frequency of patients with urine culture with >10⁵ colony-forming units per high-powered field, spanning from post-op day 0 (POD0) to 90 days after discharge. Isolated pathogens were reported. Risk factors for UTIs were assessed. Results: The average age was 69 years old at surgery, and patients were predominantly male (80%). The cumulative incidence of post-op UTIs was 14%, among which 12 patients had more than one UTI. The UTI incidence was 2%, 8%, and 7% during the immediate post-op period, within 30 days, and within 31–90 days, respectively. Isolated pathogens included Escherichia coli (26%), Enterococcus faecalis (24%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (21%), and Pseudomonas species (21%). In the immediate post-op period, female sex was the only significant risk factor. At 31 to 90 days, cutaneous ureterostomy UD was the predominant risk factor for UTIs. For ileal conduit patients, those with a Wallace ureteral anastomosis were associated with UTI 31–90 days from discharge for RC. Conclusions: Our retrospective data suggests the incidence of UTIs and their causative pathogens after RC differ based on post-operative time points and vary according to different patient risk factors.

Background: Techniques in genitourinary oncologic surgery have evolved over the past several years, shifting from traditional open approaches toward minimally invasive routes by laparoscopy.Methods: We reviewed the literature on laparoscopic surgery for genitourinary cancer, with emphasis on contemporary indications, complications, and oncologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery for urologic malignancies.Results: All urologic oncology procedures have been performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is becoming the preferred approach for managing kidney cancer. The initial experience with nephroureterectomy is encouraging. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is rapidly becoming the standard in Europe and is the procedure of choice in many centers in the United States.Conclusions: When following the open oncologic principles for the surgical treatment of malignancies, laparoscopy offers similar oncologic clinical outcomes, less morbidity, improved operative precision, and reduced convalescence time.