Michał Strzelecki

Prof. Michał Strzelecki

Lodz University of Technology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2009 in Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPiotr Marcin Szczypinski
Piotr Marcin Szczypinski
Michał StrzeleckiMichał Strzelecki
Michał Strzelecki
AMAndrzej Materka
Andrzej Materka
AKArtur Klepaczko
Artur Klepaczko

1 January 2004 in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGuylaine Collewet
Guylaine Collewet
Michał StrzeleckiMichał Strzelecki
Michał Strzelecki
FMFrançois Mariette
François Mariette

1 February 2013 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michał StrzeleckiMichał Strzelecki
Michał Strzelecki
PSPiotr Marcin Szczypinski
Piotr Marcin Szczypinski
AMAndrzej Materka
Andrzej Materka
AKArtur Klepaczko
Artur Klepaczko

14 May 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rafał ObuchowiczRafał Obuchowicz
Rafał Obuchowicz
Michał StrzeleckiMichał Strzelecki
Michał Strzelecki
Adam PiórkowskiAdam Piórkowski
Adam Piórkowski
Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently becoming a leading field in data processing

1 April 2020 in Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMarcin Kociolek
Marcin Kociolek
Michał StrzeleckiMichał Strzelecki
Michał Strzelecki
Rafał ObuchowiczRafał Obuchowicz
Rafał Obuchowicz
Image texture is a very important component in many types of images, including medical images. Medical images are often corrupted by noise and affected by artifacts. Some of the texture-based features that should describe the structure of the tissue under examination may also reflect, for example, the uneven sensitivity of the scanner within the tissue region. This in turn may lead to an inappropriate description of the tissue or incorrect classification. To limit these phenomena, the analyzed regions of interest are normalized. In texture analysis methods, image intensity normalization is usually followed by a reduction in the number of levels coding the intensity. The aim of this work was to analyze the impact of different image normalization methods and the number of intensity levels on texture classification, taking into account noise and artifacts related to uneven background brightness distribution. Analyses were performed on four sets of images: modified Brodatz textures, kidney images obtained by means of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, shoulder images acquired as T2-weighted magnetic resonance images and CT heart and thorax images. The results will be of use for choosing a particular method of image normalization, based on the types of noise and distortion present in the images.

24 January 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rafał ObuchowiczRafał Obuchowicz
Rafał Obuchowicz
JLJulia Lasek
Julia Lasek
MWMarek Wodzinski
Marek Wodzinski
Adam PiórkowskiAdam Piórkowski
Adam Piórkowski
Michał StrzeleckiMichał Strzelecki
Michał Strzelecki
KNKarolina Nurzynska
Karolina Nurzynska
Humanity stands at a pivotal moment of technological revolution, with artificial intelligence (AI) reshaping fields traditionally reliant on human cognitive abilities. This transition, driven by advancements in artificial neural networks, has transformed data processing and evaluation, creating opportunities for addressing complex and time-consuming tasks with AI solutions. Convolutional networks (CNNs) and the adoption of GPU technology have already revolutionized image recognition by enhancing computational efficiency and accuracy. In radiology, AI applications are particularly valuable for tasks involving pattern detection and classification; for example, AI tools have enhanced diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in detecting abnormalities across imaging modalities through automated feature extraction. Our analysis reveals that neuroimaging and chest imaging, as well as CT and MRI modalities, are the primary focus areas for AI products, reflecting their high clinical demand and complexity. AI tools are also used to target high-prevalence diseases, such as lung cancer, stroke, and breast cancer, underscoring AI’s alignment with impactful diagnostic needs. The regulatory landscape is a critical factor in AI product development, with the majority of products certified under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in Class IIa or Class I categories, indicating compliance with moderate-risk standards. A rapid increase in AI product development from 2017 to 2020, peaking in 2020 and followed by recent stabilization and saturation, was identified. In this work, the authors review the advancements in AI-based imaging applications, underscoring AI’s transformative potential for enhanced diagnostic support and focusing on the critical role of CNNs, regulatory challenges, and potential threats to human labor in the field of diagnostic imaging.