Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently becoming a leading field in data processing

Image texture is a very important component in many types of images, including medical images. Medical images are often corrupted by noise and affected by artifacts. Some of the texture-based features that should describe the structure of the tissue under examination may also reflect, for example, the uneven sensitivity of the scanner within the tissue region. This in turn may lead to an inappropriate description of the tissue or incorrect classification. To limit these phenomena, the analyzed regions of interest are normalized. In texture analysis methods, image intensity normalization is usually followed by a reduction in the number of levels coding the intensity. The aim of this work was to analyze the impact of different image normalization methods and the number of intensity levels on texture classification, taking into account noise and artifacts related to uneven background brightness distribution. Analyses were performed on four sets of images: modified Brodatz textures, kidney images obtained by means of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, shoulder images acquired as T2-weighted magnetic resonance images and CT heart and thorax images. The results will be of use for choosing a particular method of image normalization, based on the types of noise and distortion present in the images.

Humanity stands at a pivotal moment of technological revolution, with artificial intelligence (AI) reshaping fields traditionally reliant on human cognitive abilities. This transition, driven by advancements in artificial neural networks, has transformed data processing and evaluation, creating opportunities for addressing complex and time-consuming tasks with AI solutions. Convolutional networks (CNNs) and the adoption of GPU technology have already revolutionized image recognition by enhancing computational efficiency and accuracy. In radiology, AI applications are particularly valuable for tasks involving pattern detection and classification; for example, AI tools have enhanced diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in detecting abnormalities across imaging modalities through automated feature extraction. Our analysis reveals that neuroimaging and chest imaging, as well as CT and MRI modalities, are the primary focus areas for AI products, reflecting their high clinical demand and complexity. AI tools are also used to target high-prevalence diseases, such as lung cancer, stroke, and breast cancer, underscoring AI’s alignment with impactful diagnostic needs. The regulatory landscape is a critical factor in AI product development, with the majority of products certified under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in Class IIa or Class I categories, indicating compliance with moderate-risk standards. A rapid increase in AI product development from 2017 to 2020, peaking in 2020 and followed by recent stabilization and saturation, was identified. In this work, the authors review the advancements in AI-based imaging applications, underscoring AI’s transformative potential for enhanced diagnostic support and focusing on the critical role of CNNs, regulatory challenges, and potential threats to human labor in the field of diagnostic imaging.

Objectives Dental caries are caused by tooth demineralization due to bacterial plaque formation. However, the resulting lesions are often discrete and thus barely recognizable in intraoral radiography images. Therefore, more advanced detection techniques are in great demand among dentists and radiographers. This study was performed to evaluate the performance of texture feature maps in the recognition of discrete demineralization related to caries plaque formation. Methods Digital intraoral radiology image analysis protocols incorporating first-order features (FOF), co-occurrence matrices, gray tone difference matrices, run-length matrices (RLM), local binary patterns (LBP), and k-means clustering (CLU) were used to transform the digital intraoral radiology images of 10 patients with confirmed caries, which were retrospectively reviewed in a dental clinic. The performance of the resulting texture feature maps was compared with that of radiographic images by radiologists and dental specialists. Results Significantly improved detection of caries spots was achieved by employing the CLU and FOF texture feature maps. The caries-affected area with sharp margins was well defined using the CLU approach. A pseudo-three-dimensional effect was observed in outlining the demineralization zones inside the cavity with the FOF 5 protocol. In contrast, the LBP and RLM techniques produced less satisfactory results with unsharp edges and less detailed depiction of the lesions. Conclusions This study illustrated the applicability of texture feature maps to the recognition of demineralized spots on the tooth surface debilitated by caries and identified the best performing techniques.

Background: The perceptual quality of magnetic resonance (MR) images influences diagnosis and may compromise the treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the image quality changes influence the interobserver variability of their assessment. Methods: For the variability evaluation, a dataset containing distorted MRI images was prepared and then assessed by 31 experienced medical professionals (radiologists). Differences between observers were analyzed using the Fleiss’ kappa. However, since the kappa evaluates the agreement among radiologists taking into account aggregated decisions, a typically employed criterion of the image quality assessment (IQA) performance was used to provide a more thorough analysis. The IQA performance of radiologists was evaluated by comparing the Spearman correlation coefficients, ρ, between individual scores with the mean opinion scores (MOS) composed of the subjective opinions of the remaining professionals. Results: The experiments show that there is a significant agreement among radiologists (κ=0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.118, 0.121; P<0.001) on the quality of the assessed images. The resulted κ is strongly affected by the subjectivity of the assigned scores, separately presenting close scores. Therefore, the ρ was used to identify poor performance cases and to confirm the consistency of the majority of collected scores (ρ_mean = 0.5706). The results for interns (ρ_mean = 0.6868) supports the finding that the quality assessment of MR images can be successfully taught. Conclusions: The agreement observed among radiologists from different imaging centers confirms the subjectivity of the perception of MR images. It was shown that the image content and severity of distortions affect the IQA. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of the psychosomatic condition of the observers and their attitude.

An investigation of diseases using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging requires automatic image quality assessment methods able to exclude low-quality scans. Such methods can be also employed for an optimization of parameters of imaging systems or evaluation of image processing algorithms. Therefore, in this paper, a novel blind image quality assessment (BIQA) method for the evaluation of MR images is introduced. It is observed that the result of filtering using non-maximum suppression (NMS) strongly depends on the perceptual quality of an input image. Hence, in the method, the image is first processed by the NMS with various levels of acceptable local intensity difference. Then, the quality is efficiently expressed by the entropy of a sequence of extrema numbers obtained with the thresholded NMS. The proposed BIQA approach is compared with ten state-of-the-art techniques on a dataset containing MR images and subjective scores provided by 31 experienced radiologists. The Pearson, Spearman, Kendall correlation coefficients and root mean square error for the method assessing images in the dataset were 0.6741, 0.3540, 0.2428, and 0.5375, respectively. The extensive experimental evaluation of the BIQA methods reveals that the introduced measure outperforms related techniques by a large margin as it correlates better with human scores.