This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
Transdisciplinary research that bridges science and society is needed to address the complex social-ecological sustainability challenges we are facing. However, many transdisciplinary researchers grapple with balancing the competing demands of scientific rigour and excellence, societal impact and engagement, and self-care. This is especially evident in the growing literature by early-career researchers describing the challenges of pursuing a transdisciplinary research career in social-ecological sustainability research. To guide discussion and reflection towards a flourishing transdisciplinary research practice, we synthesized our own and other researchers’ experiences of using a transdisciplinary approach and formulated the heuristic of the ‘Triple-S’: caring for Science, Society and Self. This heuristic adds the frequently overlooked personal aspects of transdisciplinary research. Current dominant academic structures, cultures and metrics of success are not supporting a balanced and flourishing transdisciplinary research practice, but rather creating and exacerbating the trade-offs between these three aspects. As an example of a solutions-oriented approach, we developed a theory of change to address the changes we see are necessary to enable a transdisciplinary research practice in line with the Triple-S. We hope that this will foster academic environments where transdisciplinary research practice can flourish and the next generation of researchers are not burnt-out, but empowered.
My M. Sellberg; Jessica Cockburn; Petra B. Holden; David P. M. Lam. Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self. Ecosystems and People 2021, 17, 292 -305.
AMA StyleMy M. Sellberg, Jessica Cockburn, Petra B. Holden, David P. M. Lam. Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self. Ecosystems and People. 2021; 17 (1):292-305.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMy M. Sellberg; Jessica Cockburn; Petra B. Holden; David P. M. Lam. 2021. "Towards a caring transdisciplinary research practice: navigating science, society and self." Ecosystems and People 17, no. 1: 292-305.
Landscape stewardship is increasingly understood within the framing of complex social-ecological systems. To consider the implications of this, we focus on one of the key characteristics of complex social-ecological systems: they are relationally constituted, meaning that system characteristics emerge out of dynamic relations between system components. We focus on multi-actor collaboration as a key form of relationality in landscapes, seeking a more textured understanding of the social relations between landscape actors. We draw on a set of ‘gardening tools’ to analyse the boundary-crossing work of multi-actor collaboration. These tools comprise three key concepts: relational expertise, common knowledge, and relational agency. We apply the tools to two cases of landscape stewardship in South Africa: the Langkloof Region and the Tsitsa River catchment. These landscapes are characterised by economically, socio-culturally, and politically diverse groups of actors. Our analysis reveals that history and context strongly influence relational processes, that boundary-crossing work is indeed difficult, and that doing boundary-crossing work in smaller pockets within a landscape is helpful. The tools also helped to identify three key social-relational practices which lend a new perspective on boundary-crossing work: 1. belonging while differing, 2. growing together by interacting regularly and building common knowledge, and 3. learning and adapting together with humility and empathy.
Jessica Cockburn; Eureta Rosenberg; Athina Copteros; Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius; Notiswa Libala; Liz Metcalfe; Benjamin Van Der Waal. A Relational Approach to Landscape Stewardship: Towards a New Perspective for Multi-Actor Collaboration. Land 2020, 9, 224 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Eureta Rosenberg, Athina Copteros, Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius, Notiswa Libala, Liz Metcalfe, Benjamin Van Der Waal. A Relational Approach to Landscape Stewardship: Towards a New Perspective for Multi-Actor Collaboration. Land. 2020; 9 (7):224.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Eureta Rosenberg; Athina Copteros; Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius; Notiswa Libala; Liz Metcalfe; Benjamin Van Der Waal. 2020. "A Relational Approach to Landscape Stewardship: Towards a New Perspective for Multi-Actor Collaboration." Land 9, no. 7: 224.
Cockburn, J., M. Schoon, G. Cundill, C. Robinson, J. A. Aburto, S. M. Alexander, J. A. Baggio, C. Barnaud, M. Chapman, M. Garcia Llorente, G. A. García-López, R. Hill, C. Ifejika Speranza, J. Lee, C. L. Meek, E. Rosenberg, L. Schultz, and G. Thondhlana. 2020. Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: a methodology for cross-case analysis. Ecology and Society 25(3):7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11527-250307
Jessica Cockburn; Michael Schoon; Georgina Cundill; Cathy Robinson; Jaime A. Aburto; Steven M. Alexander; Jacopo A. Baggio; Cecile Barnaud; Mollie Chapman; Marina Garcia Llorente; Gustavo García López; Rosemary Hill; Chinwe Ifejika Speranza; Jean Lee; Chanda L. Meek; Eureta Rosenberg; Lisen Schultz; Gladman Thondhlana. Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: a methodology for cross-case analysis. Ecology and Society 2020, 25, 1 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Michael Schoon, Georgina Cundill, Cathy Robinson, Jaime A. Aburto, Steven M. Alexander, Jacopo A. Baggio, Cecile Barnaud, Mollie Chapman, Marina Garcia Llorente, Gustavo García López, Rosemary Hill, Chinwe Ifejika Speranza, Jean Lee, Chanda L. Meek, Eureta Rosenberg, Lisen Schultz, Gladman Thondhlana. Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: a methodology for cross-case analysis. Ecology and Society. 2020; 25 (3):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Michael Schoon; Georgina Cundill; Cathy Robinson; Jaime A. Aburto; Steven M. Alexander; Jacopo A. Baggio; Cecile Barnaud; Mollie Chapman; Marina Garcia Llorente; Gustavo García López; Rosemary Hill; Chinwe Ifejika Speranza; Jean Lee; Chanda L. Meek; Eureta Rosenberg; Lisen Schultz; Gladman Thondhlana. 2020. "Understanding the context of multifaceted collaborations for social-ecological sustainability: a methodology for cross-case analysis." Ecology and Society 25, no. 3: 1.
Landscape stewardship is considered an important place-based approach to addressing sustainability challenges. Working at landscape-level requires collaboration between diverse landscape stakeholders. In this study, we partnered with local stewardship practitioners across six cases in South Africa to investigate how they facilitate collaboration towards social-ecological sustainability outcomes. We found that practitioners facilitate collaboration among stakeholders by operating as relational hubs in the landscape. Through these hubs, they build new inter-personal relationships among stakeholders, creating social networks which enable stewardship practice. The hubs deepen human-nature relationships by creating enabling conditions for stewards to put stewardship ethics into action. Drawing on insights from these cases, we call for a relational approach to landscape stewardship which focuses on human-to-human and human-to-nature relationships. Moreover, we argue that landscape stewardship initiatives need to re-focus stewardship on stewards, recognizing them as key agents of change in addressing the conflict between agriculture and conservation inherent in many landscapes.
Jessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Ayanda Cele; Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius; Vaughan Koopman; Jean-Pierre Le Roux; Nicky McLeod; Mathieu Rouget; Samantha Schroder; Dieter Van Den Broeck; Dale R. Wright; Marijn Zwinkels. Relational Hubs for Collaborative Landscape Stewardship. Society & Natural Resources 2019, 33, 681 -693.
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Georgina Cundill, Sheona Shackleton, Ayanda Cele, Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius, Vaughan Koopman, Jean-Pierre Le Roux, Nicky McLeod, Mathieu Rouget, Samantha Schroder, Dieter Van Den Broeck, Dale R. Wright, Marijn Zwinkels. Relational Hubs for Collaborative Landscape Stewardship. Society & Natural Resources. 2019; 33 (5):681-693.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Ayanda Cele; Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius; Vaughan Koopman; Jean-Pierre Le Roux; Nicky McLeod; Mathieu Rouget; Samantha Schroder; Dieter Van Den Broeck; Dale R. Wright; Marijn Zwinkels. 2019. "Relational Hubs for Collaborative Landscape Stewardship." Society & Natural Resources 33, no. 5: 681-693.
Stewardship offers a means of addressing social-ecological sustainability challenges, from the local to the global level. The concept of stewardship has had various meanings attached to it over time, and the links between the theory and practice of stewardship are not well understood. We sought to characterise the practice of stewardship in South Africa, to better understand the relationship between theory and practice. We found that practitioners’ understandings of stewardship coalesce around two core notions: the idea of stewardship as ‘responsible use and care’ of nature, and stewardship as a ‘balancing act’ between stewards’ use of natural resources for agricultural production and their responsibility to protect and manage the wider ecosystem. Stewardship practice in South Africa is strongly influenced by the biodiversity stewardship tool; however, many practitioners are integrating biodiversity stewardship with other approaches. These emerging social-ecological stewardship initiatives operate at landscape-level and work towards integrated social and ecological stewardship outcomes, by facilitating collaboration among diverse stakeholders. Further research is needed to better understand what is required to support these integrated, collaborative and cross-sectoral initiatives. Policy mechanisms that facilitate integrated place-based stewardship practice can contribute to expanding the practice of biodiversity stewardship in South Africa. Significance: Our findings contribute to a growing understanding of what stewardship looks like in South Africa and how it is put into practice. We show that biodiversity stewardship is a prevalent understanding of stewardship practice in South Africa and is often combined with other approaches for sustainable landscape management. A broader understanding of stewardship, for example through the concept of social-ecological stewardship, can enable more integrated, collaborative approaches to landscape management, addressing the wide range of environmental and social development challenges faced in rural landscapes across South Africa.
Jessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Mathieu Rouget. The meaning and practice of stewardship in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 2019, 115, 1 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Georgina Cundill, Sheona Shackleton, Mathieu Rouget. The meaning and practice of stewardship in South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 2019; 115 (5/6):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Mathieu Rouget. 2019. "The meaning and practice of stewardship in South Africa." South African Journal of Science 115, no. 5/6: 1.
Cockburn, J., G. Cundill, S. Shackleton, M. Rouget, M. Zwinkels, S. Cornelius, L. Metcalfe, and D. van den Broeck. 2019. Collaborative stewardship in multifunctional landscapes: toward relational, pluralistic approaches. Ecology and Society 24(4):32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11085-240432
Jessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Mathieu Rouget; Marijn Zwinkels; Susanna (Ancia) Cornelius; Liz Metcalfe; Dieter Van Den Broeck. Collaborative stewardship in multifunctional landscapes: toward relational, pluralistic approaches. Ecology and Society 2019, 24, 1 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Georgina Cundill, Sheona Shackleton, Mathieu Rouget, Marijn Zwinkels, Susanna (Ancia) Cornelius, Liz Metcalfe, Dieter Van Den Broeck. Collaborative stewardship in multifunctional landscapes: toward relational, pluralistic approaches. Ecology and Society. 2019; 24 (4):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Mathieu Rouget; Marijn Zwinkels; Susanna (Ancia) Cornelius; Liz Metcalfe; Dieter Van Den Broeck. 2019. "Collaborative stewardship in multifunctional landscapes: toward relational, pluralistic approaches." Ecology and Society 24, no. 4: 1.
Margaret G. Wolff; Jessica J. Cockburn; Chris De Wet; Joana Carlos Bezerra; Matthew J. T. Weaver; Andiswa Finca; Alta De Vos; Mateboho M. Ralekhetla; Notiswa Libala; Qawekazi B. Mkabile; Oghenekaro Nelson Odume; Carolyn G. Palmer. Exploring and expanding transdisciplinary research for sustainable and just natural resource management. Ecology and Society 2019, 24, 1 .
AMA StyleMargaret G. Wolff, Jessica J. Cockburn, Chris De Wet, Joana Carlos Bezerra, Matthew J. T. Weaver, Andiswa Finca, Alta De Vos, Mateboho M. Ralekhetla, Notiswa Libala, Qawekazi B. Mkabile, Oghenekaro Nelson Odume, Carolyn G. Palmer. Exploring and expanding transdisciplinary research for sustainable and just natural resource management. Ecology and Society. 2019; 24 (4):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMargaret G. Wolff; Jessica J. Cockburn; Chris De Wet; Joana Carlos Bezerra; Matthew J. T. Weaver; Andiswa Finca; Alta De Vos; Mateboho M. Ralekhetla; Notiswa Libala; Qawekazi B. Mkabile; Oghenekaro Nelson Odume; Carolyn G. Palmer. 2019. "Exploring and expanding transdisciplinary research for sustainable and just natural resource management." Ecology and Society 24, no. 4: 1.
Innovative, pragmatic approaches are needed to support sustainable livelihoods and landscape management in complex social-ecological systems (CSES) such as river catchments. In the Tsitsa River Catchment, South Africa, researchers and natural resource managers have come together to apply such innovative approaches. Since CSES are characterised by uncertainty and surprise, understanding and managing them requires a commitment to reflexive praxis and transdisciplinarity. Accordingly, we facilitated a collective reflection and learning process in the project team to deepen our understanding of praxis in CSES. Our findings indicate that CSES thinking created an enabling framing. However, building new linkages among diverse actors to put CSES thinking into practice is challenging, since it requires the development of novel working relationships. Existing institutional structures, power dynamics, and ways of working impose significant constraints. A deeper critical realist analysis of our findings revealed a metaphor which explains why this work is challenging. In this metaphor, the Tsitsa Project team is navigating a bumpy terrain of dialectic tensions. These are tensions for example between natural science and social science, and between science and indigenous knowledge. Based on this metaphor, we suggest an expanding role for scientists and managers, and recommend transformative social learning processes to support teams navigating such bumpy terrains.
Jessica Cockburn; Carolyn (Tally) G. Palmer; Harry Biggs; Eureta Rosenberg. Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System. Land 2018, 7, 129 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Carolyn (Tally) G. Palmer, Harry Biggs, Eureta Rosenberg. Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System. Land. 2018; 7 (4):129.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Carolyn (Tally) G. Palmer; Harry Biggs; Eureta Rosenberg. 2018. "Navigating Multiple Tensions for Engaged Praxis in a Complex Social-Ecological System." Land 7, no. 4: 129.
Transdisciplinarity is a reflexive, participatory research approach that addresses societal problems by transcending the boundaries between science and society through knowledge co-production. Research ethics clearance procedures are often out of step with such forms of engaged research. Through a case study of a transdisciplinary PhD, we share our experiences of the ethical challenges involved in research that takes place beyond the bounds of procedural ethics. Our research aims to co-produce knowledge on environmental stewardship. In this chapter we consider what strategies transdisciplinary scholars can employ to ensure they fulfil the requirements of ethical research in the absence of suitably aligned institutional processes, and what changes need to be made to research ethics clearance procedures to ensure they are able to account for transdisciplinary research.
Jessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill. Ethics in Transdisciplinary Research: Reflections on the Implications of ‘Science with Society’. The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research 2018, 81 -97.
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Georgina Cundill. Ethics in Transdisciplinary Research: Reflections on the Implications of ‘Science with Society’. The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. 2018; ():81-97.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill. 2018. "Ethics in Transdisciplinary Research: Reflections on the Implications of ‘Science with Society’." The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research , no. : 81-97.
Concerns about ecological degradation and social inequalities have prompted increasing calls for stewardship in the social–ecological systems and sustainability science literature. However, how can the ideals of stewardship be realised in practice? The links between the theory and practice of stewardship are under-developed, and research to support place-based stewardship practice is limited. We therefore bring together complementary perspectives to guide research on place-based stewardship practice in the context of multifunctional landscapes. We unpack and synthesise literature on stewardship, landscapes, and collaboration for natural resource management, and highlight the ways in which the pathways approach can deepen research on collaboration and stewardship practice. We propose landscapes as a suitable level of analysis and action for stewardship. Since all landscapes are multifunctional, we argue that collaboration among multiple stakeholders is a necessary focus of such research. Our analysis reveals that existing theory on collaboration could be deepened by further research into the agency of individual human actors, the complex social–relational dynamics among actors, and the situatedness of actors within the social–ecological context. These factors mediate collaborative processes, and a better understanding of them is needed to support place-based stewardship practice. To this end, the pathways approach offers a waymark to advance research on collaboration, particularly in the complex, contested social–ecological systems that tend to characterize multifunctional landscapes.
Jessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Mathieu Rouget. Towards Place-Based Research to Support Social–Ecological Stewardship. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1434 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Georgina Cundill, Sheona Shackleton, Mathieu Rouget. Towards Place-Based Research to Support Social–Ecological Stewardship. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (5):1434.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Georgina Cundill; Sheona Shackleton; Mathieu Rouget. 2018. "Towards Place-Based Research to Support Social–Ecological Stewardship." Sustainability 10, no. 5: 1434.
Background: The KwaZulu-Natal Sandstone Sourveld (KZNSS) Research Programme is part of a collaborative, transdisciplinary research partnership between the University of KwaZulu-Natal and the eThekwini Municipality (EM), aimed at bridging the science-policy-practice gap. The research programme focuses on generating knowledge and capacity to support local land-use planning, management and policy development related to biodiversity and climate change issues. Objectives: The objectives were (1) to describe how a continuous reflective evaluation approach helped to better understand the research programme and its outcomes; and (2) to assess research outputs and outcomes, relevance of outcomes to the requirements of EM, and participants’ perceptions of the programme (both the outcomes and the process). Methods: The evaluation took a mixed methods approach, combining various quantitative and qualitative methods such as anonymous individual questionnaires, reflective exercises and group reflections. Results: The KZNSS programme was successful in capacity building and establishing a long-term partnership, but had lower scientific publication output and practice uptake than expected. Participants’ perceptions changed over time, with a decrease in the perceived success of addressing tangible research outcomes, and an increase in the perceived success of collaborative relationships in the partnership. Conclusion: Transdisciplinary partnerships can be a means of integrating research into policy and practice through knowledge exchange. An important lesson in the early stages of this partnership was to pay attention to the process and not only the outputs. The study highlights the importance of continuous participatory reflection and evaluation in such partnerships.
Chantal Taylor; Jessica Cockburn; Mathieu Rouget; Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee; Shomen Mukherjee; Rob Slotow; Debra Roberts; Richard Boon; Sean O’Donoghue; Errol Douwes. Evaluating the outcomes and processes of a research-action partnership: The need for continuous reflective evaluation. Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation 2016, 46, 16 pages .
AMA StyleChantal Taylor, Jessica Cockburn, Mathieu Rouget, Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee, Shomen Mukherjee, Rob Slotow, Debra Roberts, Richard Boon, Sean O’Donoghue, Errol Douwes. Evaluating the outcomes and processes of a research-action partnership: The need for continuous reflective evaluation. Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation. 2016; 46 (2):16 pages.
Chicago/Turabian StyleChantal Taylor; Jessica Cockburn; Mathieu Rouget; Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee; Shomen Mukherjee; Rob Slotow; Debra Roberts; Richard Boon; Sean O’Donoghue; Errol Douwes. 2016. "Evaluating the outcomes and processes of a research-action partnership: The need for continuous reflective evaluation." Bothalia, African Biodiversity & Conservation 46, no. 2: 16 pages.
Cockburn, J., M. Rouget, R. Slotow, D. Roberts, R. Boon, E. Douwes, S. O’Donoghue, C. T. Downs, S. Mukherjee, W. Musakwa, O. Mutanga, T. Mwabvu, J. Odindi, A. Odindo, Ş. Procheş, S. Ramdhani, J. Ray-Mukherjee, Sershen, M. C. Schoeman, A. J. Smit, E. Wale, and S. Willows-Munro. 2016. How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa. Ecology and Society 21(1):28.
Jessica Cockburn; Mathieu Rouget; Rob Slotow; Debra Roberts; Richard Boon; Errol Douwes; Sean O'donoghue; Colleen T. Downs; Shomen Mukherjee; Walter Musakwa; Onisimo Mutanga; Tarombera Mwabvu; John Odindi; Alfred Oduor Odindo; Şerban Procheş; Syd Ramdhani; Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee; Sershen; M. Corrie Schoeman; Albertus J. Smit; Edilegnaw Zegeye; Sandi Willows-Munro. How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa. Ecology and Society 2016, 21, 1 .
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Mathieu Rouget, Rob Slotow, Debra Roberts, Richard Boon, Errol Douwes, Sean O'donoghue, Colleen T. Downs, Shomen Mukherjee, Walter Musakwa, Onisimo Mutanga, Tarombera Mwabvu, John Odindi, Alfred Oduor Odindo, Şerban Procheş, Syd Ramdhani, Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee, Sershen, M. Corrie Schoeman, Albertus J. Smit, Edilegnaw Zegeye, Sandi Willows-Munro. How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa. Ecology and Society. 2016; 21 (1):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Mathieu Rouget; Rob Slotow; Debra Roberts; Richard Boon; Errol Douwes; Sean O'donoghue; Colleen T. Downs; Shomen Mukherjee; Walter Musakwa; Onisimo Mutanga; Tarombera Mwabvu; John Odindi; Alfred Oduor Odindo; Şerban Procheş; Syd Ramdhani; Jayanti Ray-Mukherjee; Sershen; M. Corrie Schoeman; Albertus J. Smit; Edilegnaw Zegeye; Sandi Willows-Munro. 2016. "How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa." Ecology and Society 21, no. 1: 1.
Jessica Cockburn; Hendri Coetzee; Johnnie Van Den Berg; Des Conlong. Large-scale sugarcane farmers' knowledge and perceptions of Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), push–pull and integrated pest management. Crop Protection 2014, 56, 1 -9.
AMA StyleJessica Cockburn, Hendri Coetzee, Johnnie Van Den Berg, Des Conlong. Large-scale sugarcane farmers' knowledge and perceptions of Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), push–pull and integrated pest management. Crop Protection. 2014; 56 ():1-9.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica Cockburn; Hendri Coetzee; Johnnie Van Den Berg; Des Conlong. 2014. "Large-scale sugarcane farmers' knowledge and perceptions of Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), push–pull and integrated pest management." Crop Protection 56, no. : 1-9.
Jessica J. Cockburn; Ben Khumalo-Seegelken; Martin H. Villet. IziNambuzane: IsiZulu names for insects. South African Journal of Science 2014, 110, 1 -13.
AMA StyleJessica J. Cockburn, Ben Khumalo-Seegelken, Martin H. Villet. IziNambuzane: IsiZulu names for insects. South African Journal of Science. 2014; 110 (9):1-13.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJessica J. Cockburn; Ben Khumalo-Seegelken; Martin H. Villet. 2014. "IziNambuzane: IsiZulu names for insects." South African Journal of Science 110, no. 9: 1-13.