Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address key gaps in understanding the role of resistance training (RT) as an intervention to mitigate age-related sarcopenia. Specifically, it examined: (i) effects on body composition and physical performance; (ii) moderating influences of age and training intensity; and (iii) the presence of a dose–response relationship within the FITT–VP framework. Methods: A comprehensive search of multiple databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating RT in older adults with sarcopenia. Data on body composition, muscle strength (MS), and functional performance were extracted. Moderator analyses assessed the impact of participant and intervention characteristics, and meta-regression was performed to explore dose–response patterns. Results: Twenty-five RCTs involving 1,302 participants were included. RT produced significant improvements in MS (ES = 0.71), lean mass (LM, [ES = 0.22]), fat mass (FM, [ES = − 0.17]), walking ability (WA, [ES = 0.41]), grip strength ([GS, [ES = 0.55]), muscle quality (MQ, [ES = 1.25]) (all p < 0.05), but this large effect size was based on only two studies and requires caution interpretation. Dose–response meta-regression revealed a significant non-linear relationship between total RT duration and functional gains, with optimal estimated cumulative volumes of ~ 2,716 min for WA. Conclusion: RT is a robust, evidence-based strategy for enhancing MS, functional performance, and body composition in sarcopenic older adults. Findings suggest approximate cumulative duration ranges (~ 1,043 min for MS and ~ 2,716 min for WA) that were associated with maximal gains in pooled analyses. These values should be interpreted as exploratory indicators supporting individualized programming within the FITT-VP framework. Clinicians and exercise practitioners should tailor intensity (60–80% 1RM), frequency, and progression to optimize adherence, effectiveness, and long-term functional outcomes in sarcopenia management.

Background/Objectives: Ammonia inhalants, commonly known as smelling salts, are widely used in sport as an acute arousal strategy, yet their ergogenic value remains uncertain. This systematic review and three-level meta-analysis examined the acute effects of ammonia inhalation on physical performance and selected psychophysiological outcomes. Methods: Controlled human studies involving healthy adults, physically active individuals, or athletes were included when they compared ammonia inhalation with placebo, sham, or no-inhalation control conditions. Physical performance was the primary outcome, with heart rate and selected subjective responses analyzed as exploratory secondary outcomes. Results: Ten studies were included. The primary analysis showed no statistically significant effect of ammonia inhalation on overall physical performance (k = 47, g = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.06, 0.28]). Heart rate and subjective exertion/fatigue were also not significantly affected. In contrast, subjective activation/arousal increased significantly (k = 9, g = 0.73, 95% CI [0.43, 1.04]), although this finding was based on only two studies. Moderator analyses did not show consistent subgroup differences for performance type, training status, or comparator type, whereas sex-based differences were exploratory and based on limited evidence. Sensitivity analyses suggested that physical performance became significantly improved after removal of influential effects, and power/explosive performance showed a possible benefit; however, these findings should be considered preliminary rather than confirmatory. Conclusions: Overall, ammonia inhalation appears to act primarily as a brief arousal stimulus rather than a consistent ergogenic aid. Potential benefits may depend on task demands, with explosive or repeated high-intensity tasks appearing more plausible targets than maximal strength or precision-based skills. Current evidence remains limited by small samples, heterogeneous protocols, and low certainty.