Maria Chatzinikolaidou

Prof. Maria Chatzinikolaidou

University of Crete, Department of Materials Science and Technology
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2016 in Drug Discovery Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Maria ChatzinikolaidouMaria Chatzinikolaidou
Maria Chatzinikolaidou

28 April 2021 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRafaela-Maria Kavasi
Rafaela-Maria Kavasi
Catarina CoelhoCatarina Coelho
Catarina Coelho
Varvara PlataniaVarvara Platania
Varvara Platania
PQPaulo Quadros
Paulo Quadros
Maria ChatzinikolaidouMaria Chatzinikolaidou
Maria Chatzinikolaidou
Hydroxyapatite (HA) is an important component of the bone mineral phase. It has been used in several applications, such as bone regenerative medicine, tooth implants, drug delivery and oral care cosmetics. In the present study, three different batches of a commercial nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) material were physicochemically-characterized and biologically-evaluated by means of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity using appropriate cell lines based on well-established guidelines (ISO10993-5 and OECD 487). The nHAs were characterized for their size and morphology by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and were found to have a rod-like shape with an average length of approximately 20 to 40 nm. The nanoparticles were cytocompatible according to ISO 10993-5, and the in vitro micronucleus assay showed no genotoxicity to cells. Internalization by MC3T3-E1 cells was observed by TEM images, with nHA identified only in the cytoplasm and extracellular space. This result also validates the genotoxicity since nHA was not observed in the nucleus. The internalization of nHA by the cells did not seem to affect normal cell behavior, since the results showed good biocompatibility of these nHA nanoparticles. Therefore, this work is a relevant contribution for the safety assessment of this nHA material.

1 May 2015 in Applied Surface Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDPaulius Danilevicius
Paulius Danilevicius
LGLeoni Georgiadi
Leoni Georgiadi
CPChristopher J. Pateman
Christopher J. Pateman
FCFrederik Claeyssens
Frederik Claeyssens
Maria ChatzinikolaidouMaria Chatzinikolaidou
Maria Chatzinikolaidou
MFMaria Farsari
Maria Farsari

10 July 2017 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNicholas Skandalis
Nicholas Skandalis
ADAnastasia Dimopoulou
Anastasia Dimopoulou
AAnthie Georgopoulou
Anthie Georgopoulou
NGNikolaos Gallios
Nikolaos Gallios
DPDIMITRIOS PAPADOPOULOS
DIMITRIOS PAPADOPOULOS
Maria ChatzinikolaidouMaria Chatzinikolaidou
Maria Chatzinikolaidou
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been demonstrated to restrain bacterial growth, while maintaining minimal risk in development of bacterial resistance and human cell toxicity that conventional silver compounds exhibit. Several physical and chemical methods have been reported to synthesize AgNPs. However, these methods are expensive and involve heavy chemical reduction agents. An alternative approach to produce AgNPs in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly way employs a biological pathway using various plant extracts to reduce metal ions. The size control issue, and the stability of nanoparticles, remain some of the latest challenges in such methods. In this study, we used two different concentrations of fresh leaf extract of the plant Arbutus unedo (LEA) as a reducing and stabilizing agent to produce two size variations of AgNPs. UV-Vis spectroscopy, Dynamic Light Scattering, Transmission Electron Microscopy, and zeta potential were applied for the characterization of AgNPs. Both AgNP variations were evaluated for their antibacterial efficacy against the gram-negative species Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as the gram-positive species Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Although significant differences have been achieved in the nanoparticles’ size by varying the plant extract concentration during synthesis, the antibacterial effect was almost the same.

1 January 2024 in Regenerative Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKonstantinos Loukelis
Konstantinos Loukelis
NKNikos Koutsomarkos
Nikos Koutsomarkos
AMAntonios G Mikos
Antonios G Mikos
Maria ChatzinikolaidouMaria Chatzinikolaidou
Maria Chatzinikolaidou
Biofabrication techniques allow for the construction of biocompatible and biofunctional structures composed from biomaterials, cells and biomolecules. Bioprinting is an emerging 3D printing method which utilizes biomaterial-based mixtures with cells and other biological constituents into printable suspensions known as bioinks. Coupled with automated design protocols and based on different modes for droplet deposition, 3D bioprinters are able to fabricate hydrogel-based objects with specific architecture and geometrical properties, providing the necessary environment that promotes cell growth and directs cell differentiation towards application-related lineages. For the preparation of such bioinks, various water-soluble biomaterials have been employed, including natural and synthetic biopolymers, and inorganic materials. Bioprinted constructs are considered to be one of the most promising avenues in regenerative medicine due to their native organ biomimicry. For a successful application, the bioprinted constructs should meet particular criteria such as optimal biological response, mechanical properties similar to the target tissue, high levels of reproducibility and printing fidelity, but also increased upscaling capability. In this review, we highlight the most recent advances in bioprinting, focusing on the regeneration of various tissues including bone, cartilage, cardiovascular, neural, skin and other organs such as liver, kidney, pancreas and lungs. We discuss the rapidly developing co-culture bioprinting systems used to resemble the complexity of tissues and organs and the crosstalk between various cell populations towards regeneration. Moreover, we report on the basic physical principles governing 3D bioprinting, and the ideal bioink properties based on the biomaterials’ regenerative potential. We examine and critically discuss the present status of 3D bioprinting regarding its applicability and current limitations that need to be overcome to establish it at the forefront of artificial organ production and transplantation.

9 May 2006 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJürgen Becker
Jürgen Becker
AKAxel Kirsch
Axel Kirsch
FSFrank Schwarz
Frank Schwarz
Maria ChatzinikolaidouMaria Chatzinikolaidou
Maria Chatzinikolaidou
DRDaniel Rothamel
Daniel Rothamel
HJHerbert Peter Jennissen
Herbert Peter Jennissen
The aim of the present study was to investigate bone formation to recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2)-biocoated and rhBMP-2-nonbiocoated titanium implants after implantation in dogs. Implantation of sand-blasted and acid-etched (C), chromosulfuric acid surface-enhanced (CSA), and rhBMP-2-biocoated CSA [BMP-A: noncovalently immobilized rhBMP-2 (596 ng/cm2), BMP-B: covalently immobilized rhBMP-2 (819 ng/cm2)] implants was performed in both the mandible and tibia of dogs. After 4 weeks of healing, the percentage of direct bone to implant contact (BIC) and the induced bone density (BD) at a distance of less than and greater than 1 mm adjacent to each implant was assessed. Histomorphometric analysis of implants inserted in the mandible and tibia revealed that BIC values appeared to be highest in the BMP-B group, followed by BMP-A, CSA, and C. BD as measured at a distance of BMP-A>CSA>C. However, no differences between groups were observed at a distance of >1 mm. Within the limits of the present study, it may be concluded that rhBMP-2 immobilized by covalent and noncovalent methods on CSA-treated implant surfaces seemed to be stable and promoted direct bone apposition in a concentration-dependant manner.