Objective: Research about the impact of acute stress on inhibitory control remains a contentious topic, with no consensus reached thus far. This study aims to investigate the effects of acute stress on an individual’s inhibitory control abilities and to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms by analyzing resting state electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Methods: We recruited 32 male college students through participant recruitment information to undergo within-subject experiments under stress and non-stress conditions. Physiological indicators (cortisol and heart rate), self-report questionnaires, and behavioral data from the Stroop task were collected before, during, and after the experiment. Additionally, a five-minute eyes closed resting state EEG data collection was conducted during the Stroop task before. Results: (1) Acute stress led to a reduction in the conflict effect during the participants’ Stroop task in individuals. (2) Stress resulted in an increase in the power of the beta in the resting state EEG. (3) Acute stress caused an increase in the duration of class D and an increase in the transition probabilities from classes C and B to class D in the microstates of the resting state EEG. (4) Acute stress leads to an increase in beta power values in individuals’ resting state EEGs, which is significantly negatively correlated with the reduction of the conflict effect in the Stroop task under stress. Conclusions: Acute stress can enhance individuals’ attentional level, thereby promoting inhibitory control performance.

Background: Anxiety and depression have significant impacts on individuals’ mental health and social functioning, particularly among college students. Psychological resilience is considered a crucial resource for coping with adversity and stress and may play a key role in alleviating anxiety and depression symptoms. The aim of this study is to explore the finer-grained potential relationships between psychological resilience, anxiety, and depression among college students.Methods: This study employed network analysis to examine the psychological resilience, anxiety, and depression status of a randomly sampled cohort of 855 college students (51.8% female; M = 18.70, SD = 1.13). Statistical analyses and network visualization were conducted using R version 4.2.2 and the qgraph package. Bridge centrality indices of variables within the network were computed, with particular emphasis on the significance of bridge symptoms within the network structure.Results: Significant covariation was observed between anxiety and depression symptoms. Psychological resilience exhibited a negative correlation with both anxiety and depression, with a negative bridge expected influence value for R10 “Can handle unpleasant feelings”, indicating a potential protective role of psychological resilience in mitigating these mental health issues. R10 “Can handle unpleasant feelings” occupies the most central position within the psychological resilience network, with the smallest BEI value (-0.01), indicating its protective role in the overall network. To some extent, it can regulate anxiety and depression symptoms.Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interrelationships between psychological resilience, anxiety, and depression among college students through network analysis. Bridge expected influence analysis identified “R10” as a protective factor and “A7” as a key risk factor. The findings suggest that interventions targeting bridge symptoms and enhancing resilience may help alleviate anxiety and depression. Prioritizing these two symptoms in future research could yield greater intervention benefits.

In uncertain situations, individuals seek to maximize rewards while managing risks. Yet, the effects of acute stress and anxiety on decision-making in ambiguous and risky contexts are unclear. This study aims to contribute to the exploration of how acute stress influences sensitivity to immediate vs. delayed rewards, risk management strategies, and the role of anxiety in these processes. This study used the laboratory acute stress induction paradigm to analyze the direction of influence of acute stress on ambiguity decision-making and risky decision-making in males and then used moderating effect analysis to study the impact of anxiety on this process. The results show that a combination of the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test and the Sing-a-Song Stress Test can successfully induce acute stress, which reduces both the proportion of the options selected that represent long-term rewards and risk-adjustment ability. Additionally, trait anxiety had a moderating effect on the influence of stress on ambiguity decision-making. Acute stress reduces focus on long-term rewards while increasing focus on short-term rewards, leading to impulsivity and impaired risk-adjustment. Additionally, to some extent, high trait anxiety scores predict better performance in making decisions under ambiguity during stress.

Inhibitory control, as an essential cognitive ability, affects the development of higher cognitive functions. Rhythmic perceptual stimulation has been used to improve cognitive abilities. It is unclear, however, whether it can be used to improve inhibitory control. This study used the Go/NoGo task and the Stroop task to assess various levels of inhibitory control using rhythmic audio-visual stimuli as the stimulus mode. Sixty subjects were randomly divided into three groups to receive 6 Hz, 10 Hz, and white noise stimulation for 30 min. Two tasks were completed by each subject both before and after the stimulus. Before and after the task, closed-eye resting EEG data were collected. The results showed no differences in behavioral and EEG measures of the Go/NoGo task among the three groups. While both 6 Hz and 10 Hz audio-visual stimulation reduced the conflict effect in the Stroop task, only 6 Hz audio-visual stimulation improved the amplitude of the N2 component and decreased the conflict score. Although rhythmic audio-visual stimulation did not enhance response inhibition, it improved conflict inhibition.

Objective: This study developed the Uncertain Drop Stress Test (UDST), an uncertain stress induction paradigm based on the high survival-relevant threat of fear of falling, wherein neither the occurrence nor the timing of the fall is predictable. The aim was to compare its stress induction efficacy and neural oscillatory changes with those of the Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test (SECPT), a certain stress paradigm, and to examine gender differences. Methods: Forty-eight participants (24 males; 24 females) were recruited. Psychological indicators (subjective stress, negative affect, and state anxiety) and physiological indicators (heart rate, heart rate variability, galvanic skin response, and salivary cortisol) were measured before and after stress to compare induction efficacy. Resting-state EEG was collected for frequency domain analysis to explore neural oscillatory changes. Results: UDST induced more pronounced psychophysiological changes. Notably, only UDST significantly decreased heart rate variability and increased galvanic skin response. UDST triggered an “exogenous vigilance mode” characterized by enhanced high-frequency (Beta/Gamma) activity, whereas SECPT elicited an “interoceptive focusing mode” characterized by suppressed low-frequency (Theta/Alpha) activity. Females exhibited higher heart rate and Beta activity than males under both stress conditions. Conclusions: UDST elicits stronger psychophysiological responses and distinct neural oscillatory patterns, with females showing greater stress reactivity.