Cletah Shoko

Dr. Cletah Shoko

University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 December 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBTrisha Bhaga
Trisha Bhaga
TDTimothy Dube
Timothy Dube
Munyaradzi Davies ShekedeMunyaradzi Davies Shekede
Munyaradzi Davies Shekede
Cletah ShokoCletah Shoko
Cletah Shoko
Climate variability and recurrent droughts have caused remarkable strain on water resources in most regions across the globe, with the arid and semi-arid areas being the hardest hit. The impacts have been notable on surface water resources, which are already under threat from massive abstractions due to increased demand, as well as poor conservation and unsustainable land management practices. Drought and climate variability, as well as their associated impacts on water resources, have gained increased attention in recent decades as nations seek to enhance mitigation and adaptation mechanisms. Although the use of satellite technologies has, of late, gained prominence in generating timely and spatially explicit information on drought and climate variability impacts across different regions, they are somewhat hampered by difficulties in detecting drought evolution due to its complex nature, varying scales, the magnitude of its occurrence, and inherent data gaps. Currently, a number of studies have been conducted to monitor and assess the impacts of climate variability and droughts on water resources in sub-Saharan Africa using different remotely sensed and in-situ datasets. This study therefore provides a detailed overview of the progress made in tracking droughts using remote sensing, including its relevance in monitoring climate variability and hydrological drought impacts on surface water resources in sub-Saharan Africa. The paper further discusses traditional and remote sensing methods of monitoring climate variability, hydrological drought, and water resources, tracking their application and key challenges, with a particular emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa. Additionally, characteristics and limitations of various remote sensors, as well as drought and surface water indices, namely, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), Normalized Difference Vegetation (NDVI), Vegetation Condition Index (VCI), and Water Requirement Satisfaction Index (WRSI), Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI), Land Surface Water Index (LSWI+5), Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI+5), Automated Water Extraction Index (shadow) (AWEIsh), and Automated Water Extraction Index (non-shadow) (AWEInsh), and their relevance in climate variability and drought monitoring are discussed. Additionally, key scientific research strides and knowledge gaps for further investigations are highlighted. While progress has been made in advancing the application of remote sensing in water resources, this review indicates the need for further studies on assessing drought and climate variability impacts on water resources, especially in the context of climate change and increased water demand. The results from this study suggests that Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellite data are likely to be best suited to monitor climate variability, hydrological drought, and surface water bodies, due to their availability at relatively low cost, impressive spectral, spatial, and temporal characteristics. The most effective drought and water indices are SPI, PDSI, NDVI, VCI, NDWI, MNDWI, MNDWI+5, AWEIsh, and AWEInsh. Overall, the findings of this study emphasize the increasing role and potential of remote sensing in generating spatially explicit information on drought and climate variability impacts on surface water resources. However, there is a need for future studies to consider spatial data integration techniques, radar data, precipitation, cloud computing, and machine learning or artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to improve on understanding climate and drought impacts on water resources across various scales.


2 January 2015 in African Journal of Aquatic Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TDTimothy Dube
Timothy Dube
Onisimo MutangaOnisimo Mutanga
Onisimo Mutanga
KSK Seutloali
K Seutloali
Samuel AdelabuSamuel Adelabu
Samuel Adelabu
Cletah ShokoCletah Shoko
Cletah Shoko

28 August 2021 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMbulisi Sibanda
Mbulisi Sibanda
Onisimo MutangaOnisimo Mutanga
Onisimo Mutanga
VCVimbayi Chimonyo
Vimbayi Chimonyo
DCDr Alistair David Clulow
Dr Alistair David Clulow
Cletah ShokoCletah Shoko
Cletah Shoko
Tafadzwanashe MabhaudhiTafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi
Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi
Accurate and timely information on surface water quality and quantity is critical for various applications, including irrigation agriculture. In-field water quality and quantity data from unmanned aerial vehicle systems (UAVs) could be useful in closing spatial data gaps through the generation of near-real-time, fine resolution, spatially explicit information required for water resources accounting. This study assessed the progress, opportunities, and challenges in mapping and modelling water quality and quantity using data from UAVs. To achieve this research objective, a systematic review was adopted. The results show modest progress in the utility of UAVs, especially in the global south. This could be attributed, in part, to high costs, a lack of relevant skills, and the regulations associated with drone procurement and operational costs. The progress is further compounded by a general lack of research focusing on UAV application in water resources monitoring and assessment. More importantly, the lack of robust and reliable water quantity and quality data needed to parameterise models remains challenging. However, there are opportunities to advance scientific inquiry for water quality and quantity accounting by integrating UAV data and machine learning.

1 October 2016 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cletah ShokoCletah Shoko
Cletah Shoko
Onisimo MutangaOnisimo Mutanga
Onisimo Mutanga
TDTimothy Dube
Timothy Dube

21 March 2022 in Geocarto International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TGTanushri Govender
Tanushri Govender
TDTimothy Dube
Timothy Dube
Cletah ShokoCletah Shoko
Cletah Shoko
The impact of land use land cover (LULC) change and climate variability on water resources poses as a major threat in semi-arid environments, especially in the sub-Saharan Africa. Countries in sub-Saharan Africa are vulnerable to water scarcity. Hence, there is an urgent need for understanding the various methods for LULC change and climate variability assessment, to aid in water resources management at various scales. Various studies have modelled and assessed the effect of LULC change and climate variability on hydrological responses, using different approaches. In this regard, this paper provides a detailed review on the progress of various remote sensing techniques in modelling and assessing the effect of LULC change and climate variability on hydrological processes. The review also highlights the critical scientific strides and challenges of remotely-sensed applications in LULC change characterization and total evaporation estimation. Specifically, research gaps in the estimation of total evaporation in response to LULC change and climate variability, using remote sensing are also highlighted. The study demonstrated remotely-sensed methods used in hydrologic models such as the SCS-CN, WetSpa, JULES and the SWAT model that are used to determine run-off and streamflow. These methods have a component of total evaporation however evapotranspiration (ET) is not the sole focus. The study showed that the application of the remotely sensed SEBS tool has been widely accepted as a viable method to estimate total evaporation. However, it has been observed that there is limited focus on the impact of LULC change and climate variability on total evaporation.