Existential threats, including threats to the self, society, and the planet, are present throughout the lifespan and form a core element of the human experience. To consolidate knowledge and constructs about how people can adequately respond to existential threats, we convened an interdisciplinary working group, which consisted of eight researchers from the fields of psychology, systemic theology, practical theology, religious studies, cognitive science, palliative care, and sustainability science. The group met one day per week for 9 months to engage in an interactive co-creative process of data collection and analyses, discussion, iterative presentations, and writing. The process resulted in the development of an interdisciplinary model that pulls together the key themes of how people, societies, and systems can foster existential resilience and transformation. The model consists of three axes across which we (individuals, groups, systems) have to strengthen or stretch our “inner muscles”: connectedness, agency, and time. All axes contribute to the development of our inner capacities and, ultimately, meaning and purpose, which are crucial to support resilience and transformation. Our interdisciplinary overarching model provides a common conceptualization for existential resilience and transformation that can bridge existing research to support individual, collective, and large-scale system-change work. Its relevance and potential implementation are illustrated and presented from different disciplinary angles.

Purposes: The Body Awareness Questionnaire (BAQ) has been considered the best available measure of body awareness, but it is not currently available in Spanish. Methods: To address this shortcoming, a sample of 281 Spanish participants completed a survey with a Spanish version of the BAQ, as well as the Body Appreciation Scale (BAS-2), the Self-Compassion Scale-Short (SCS-S) and the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale-Short (NSSS-S). Results: Analysis of the Spanish BAQ showed good reliability: α = 0.82. Positive correlations with the BAS-2 and the SCS-S, and no significant correlation with the NSSS-S, support the convergent and discriminant validity of the Spanish BAQ. In conceptual validity, the Spanish BAQ further successfully discriminated between meditators and non-meditators, showing additional support for the conceptual validity of the measure. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supported a two-factor structure, rather than a one-factor or four-factor version, as proposed for the original English version. Conclusions: The Spanish version of the BAQ has shown adequate reliability and validity and would be a good scale to continue exploring in clinical Spanish population samples, e.g., in patients with chronic pain, and non-clinical ones, e.g., after interventions in sexuality or sport. It could be an interesting questionnaire to assess outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions.

Objectives: Sexual satisfaction is a crucial part of sexual health and is positively related to well-being and quality of life. However, there are at present no composite measures of sexual satisfaction available in Swedish. The New Sexual Satisfaction Scale – Short form (NSSS-S) is a measure of sexual satisfaction that has been validated in multiple languages, and the aim of the present study is to evaluate the psychometric properties and intelligibility of a Swedish version of the NSSS-S. Methods: A convenience sample (N = 479) responded to an online survey including the Swedish NSSS-S and a single-item measure of sexual satisfaction. Qualitative evaluation of the translation was done within 20 semi-structured interviews where respondents gave open answers to the NSSS-S items. Results: Results showed that a two-factor solution, matching the subscales Ego-Centred and Partner/Activity-Centred sexual satisfaction, showed good to acceptable fit to the data. However, removal of the item “Partner’s ability to orgasm” increased model fit significantly. Internal reliability for the full scale was high and NSSS-S scores correlated strongly with the single-item measure of sexual satisfaction. Qualitative evaluation showed no issues with comprehension of the translated items or with the semantic and cultural validity of the translated measure, but revealed additional aspects of measuring sexual satisfaction not captured by a scale such as the NSSS-S. Conclusions: The Swedish NSSS-S displayed the expected bi-dimensional factor structure, high convergent validity in relation to the other available measure of sexual satisfaction and can be used with both partnered and single respondents. Qualitative evaluation indicated that the NSSS-S is generally seen to capture important elements of measuring sexual satisfaction but that it may not adequately capture experiences of situational and temporal variability in sexual satisfaction. The Swedish NSSS-S thus showed comparable psychometric and semantic properties to the original version and can be used to measure sexual satisfaction in a Swedish speaking population.