Background/Objectives: Painkiller use in amateur sports and, especially, in football is increasingly being discussed, but the scientific data on this field are very limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of painkiller use in amateur football from the perspective of coaches, as well as to determine how and to which extent coaches can influence their teams in terms of painkiller use and prevention. Methods: Using an online questionnaire, a cross-sectional analysis of painkiller use in German amateur football from the 4th league to the lowest amateur classes was carried out from the perspective of team coaches. A total of 628 participants were contacted, and 400 (63.7%) completed the questionnaire completely and were therefore included in the evaluation. Results: Of the 400 participating team coaches in amateur football, 369 (92.3%) were male and 31 (7.7%) were female. The coaches reported that 36.2% (SD = 29.1) of their players have used painkillers at some point due to football-related pain in their career. The majority of coaches believed that the use of painkillers is not compatible with competition (74%), and even more believed that it is not compatible with football training (90.8%). Furthermore, 56.2% of the coaches themselves had already taken painkillers in their own football career for football-related pain, and 64% had already bought over-the-counter painkillers without a prescription. The use of painkillers increased in the higher playing levels. The availability of painkillers in first aid kits was reported by around 60%, but they were reported as freely accessible in the dressing room by only 10% of the coaches. Conclusions: This is the first study to describe the painkiller use in amateur football from the perspective of coaches. The prevalence of painkiller use in this study was found to be significantly lower than what is indicated in the data from the existing literature. The majority of coaches see the use of painkillers during games and training as incompatible, even though there is a large proportion of coaches who have already bought over-the-counter painkillers for football-related pain. As the first scientific analysis of team coaches, this study provides fundamental data for the prevention of excessive painkiller use in amateur football.

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is the most common joint disease, characterized by the degeneration of joint cartilage. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) injections are a well-established non-surgical treatment. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed knee OA patients receiving IAHA combined with niacinamide injections, assessing pain reduction in relation to patient data, the number of injections, and radiological findings. Results: IAHA injections led to significant pain reduction on the numeric rating scale (NRS) (0–10), with a mean decrease of 3.34 ± 1.65. Pain relief was greater with multiple injections. A comparison of subgroups by injection frequency (1, 2, or >2) showed significant pain reduction between 1 and 2 injections (p = 0.027) and between 1 and >2 injections (p = 0.032). The OA grade measured using the Kellgren–Lawrence (p = 0.95) and Vallotton MRI classifications (p = 0.50) did not correlate with pain reduction. However, patients with meniscal damage (p = 0.02) showed a greater benefit. A strong positive correlation was found between baseline pain intensity and pain reduction (p < 0.001; r = 0.61). Conclusions: IAHA with niacinamide significantly reduces knee OA pain, with more injections enhancing pain relief. Greater benefits were observed in patients with higher baseline pain and meniscal damage. The favorable safety profile and potential for repeated treatments make IAHA a valuable option in knee OA management.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgeries, standardized, evidence-based rehabilitation protocols remain lacking. Digital medical devices (DMDs) like the “Orthelligent” system have gained relevance as adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy, offering continuous, objective monitoring of functional recovery. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis included 335 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and used the “Orthelligent home” system between August 2022 and December 2024. In total, 5675 recorded test and exercise events were analyzed. Functional recovery was assessed using the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) across five defined rehabilitation phases (0–4). All patients followed a structured rehabilitation program aligned with current clinical practice guidelines, supplemented by Orthelligent as a home-based digital tool for daily monitoring. Results: Significant functional improvement was observed during early rehabilitation phases, with the LSI increasing from 0.64 ± 0.02 in phase 0 to 0.81 ± 0.01 in phase 2 (p < 0.001). Time since surgery was a significant positive predictor (p = 0.034), while pain showed a strong negative impact on performance (p < 0.001). Anthropometric factors had no significant effect. Exercises associated with high rates of drop-out, pain, or difficulty were identified and linked to specific rehab phases. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that digital rehabilitation monitoring can reliably reflect patient progress after ACL reconstruction. The early postoperative period (first 3 months) is critical for functional gains, highlighting the need for individualized, pain-sensitive rehabilitation strategies.

Background: Osteochondral fractures (OCFs) following acute patellar dislocation significantly influence treatment decisions and long-term prognosis, yet reliable risk stratification remains elusive. This study aimed to identify demographic and trochlear morphology predictors of fracture occurrence in a large patient cohort. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 261 skeletally mature patients with acute patellar dislocation from 2000 to 2024 (mean age 24 ± 10 years, 59% male), excluding those with previous knee surgery, additional injuries, or skeletal immaturity. A comprehensive MRI assessment evaluated trochlear morphology (Dejour classification, sulcus angle, trochlear groove depth, and facet measurements) and patellofemoral alignment parameters (TT-TG distance, Q-angle, and congruence angle). Multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors for the development of osteochondral fractures. Results: Osteochondral fractures occurred in 133 patients (51% [of those undergoing MRI evaluation]). Male gender emerged as the strongest predictor (OR 2.38, 95% CI: 1.30–4.42, p = 0.005), followed by right-sided dislocation (OR 2.33, 95% CI: 1.21–4.58, p = 0.013). Notably, higher-grade trochlear dysplasia (Dejour Grades 3–4) was associated with lower fracture rates, being more common in non-fracture patients (27% vs. 10%, p = 0.003). Trochlear condyle asymmetry was also significant (OR 1.14, p = 0.004). Most patellofemoral alignment parameters, including TT-TG distance and Q-angle, showed no significant predictive value. Conclusions: Male gender and right-sided dislocation are associated with higher rates of osteochondral fracture after patellar dislocation. Patients with normal trochlear anatomy have higher fracture rates than those with severe dysplasia. These findings suggest that demographic factors and trochlear morphology should be considered in the diagnostic workup of acute patellar dislocations, though prospective validation is needed before implementing screening protocols.

Background/Objectives: To analyse postoperative pain trajectories after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using data from a digital rehabilitation system, and to determine (i) whether combined ligament injuries are perceived as more painful than isolated ACL tears, (ii) which patient characteristics are associated with clinically relevant pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] > 5), and (iii) whether higher early pain is associated with later discontinuation of digital monitoring. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used routine data recorded by a validated sensor-based home rehabilitation system in patients after ACL reconstruction. This approach has previously been used to analyse functional recovery trajectories. All patients with ACL-related indications who performed at least one postoperative test were included and classified into four groups: isolated ACL rupture, ACL + meniscus, ACL + collateral ligament, and ACL + collateral ligament + meniscus. Pain during exercises and tests was recorded on a 0–10 VAS. High pain was defined as VAS > 5. Group comparison between indication types, anthropometric and activity-related variables and the proportion of high-pain events were performed using chi-square tests. Early pain (first postoperative month) was analysed in relation to the presence of later tests (≥3 months) to explore associations with discontinuation of digital monitoring. Results: Combined ligament injuries showed a significantly higher proportion of high-pain events during rehabilitation compared with isolated ACL ruptures (5.8% vs. 2.4%, overall p < 0.001). In particular, combined ligament injuries with ACL + collateral ligament rupture were associated with a greater share of VAS > 5 ratings in the early rehabilitation phases. No relevant association was observed between sex or BMI category and the occurrence of high pain, while age group showed an overall association without a consistent directional pattern. Sport activity level showed a strong relationship with high pain (p < 0.001). Early pain demonstrated a small but statistically significant negative correlation with later test participation (r = −0.15, approximately 2% of variance, p = 0.0076); however, this association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant when analysed using mixed-effects models accounting for within-patient clustering, indicating that patients with higher early pain tended to discontinue digital monitoring. Conclusions: Digital routine data after ACL reconstruction suggest that (i) combined ACL–collateral ligament injuries are perceived as more painful than isolated ACL tears, (ii) high postoperative pain is more closely related to activity level and injury pattern than to sex or BMI, while age group shows an overall but non-directional association, and (iii) higher early pain shows a weak bivariate correlation with digital disengagement that was not confirmed in mixed-effects models. Pain is therefore an exploratory marker warranting further investigation, rather than a confirmed independent predictor of adherence in app-based rehabilitation.

Clinical decision-making following knee injuries in football differs fundamentally between professional and amateur athletes. These differences stem from medical standards, economic resource availability, structural constraints, and ethical considerations. This clinical review systematically examines the variability in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies after knee injuries between professional and amateur football players. While amateur football players benefit from evidence-based standard procedures for conservative and surgical treatment of knee injuries, advanced conservative treatment measures are often limited by accessibility and cost. Professional football players are frequently driven by the goal of achieving „stay and play“ or rapid return-to-play following knee injuries. To meet these expectations, treatments for knee injuries in professional players often deviate significantly from standard care, with the understanding that these strategies may compromise the long-term health of the knee joint.