This article explores the properties of composite materials employed in dental fillings. A traditional nano-hybrid composite containing nanofiller particles exceeding 82% by weight served as a benchmark. The remaining samples were fabricated from ormocer resin, maintaining an identical nanofiller content of 84%. In all specimens, the nanoparticles were dispersed randomly within the matrix. This study presents findings from investigations into surface geometry, hardness, wettability, and tribological behavior. The microscopic observations revealed that ormocer-based samples exhibited greater surface roughness than those composed of the traditional composite. Hardness testing indicated that both ceramic addition and sample preparation significantly influenced mechanical properties. Ceramic-enhanced samples demonstrated superior hardness, surpassing the reference composite by 30% and 43%, respectively. Contact angle measurements revealed hydrophilic characteristics in the classic composite, contrasting with the hydrophobic nature of ceramic-containing samples. Tribological evaluations revealed the superiority of the classic composite in terms of friction coefficients and volumetric wear compared to ormocer-based materials.

Introduction: Parafunctions (harmful habits) play a crucial role in the formation of temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction syndrome with disc displacement. Disorder symptoms in temporo-mandibular joints manifest themselves in the eye and ear but are usually not associated with the...

Dental composites are widely used in restorative dentistry; however, their long-term clinical performance is strongly influenced by mechanical and tribological behavior under oral conditions. Understanding the relationship between material structure, surface characteristics, and functional properties is therefore essential. This preliminary methodological study evaluated the mechanical, tribological, and wetting properties of three light-cured dental composites—Enamel Plus HRi, Amaris, and Estelite Asteria—commonly used in clinical practice. The materials were characterized in terms of surface morphology, hardness, Young’s modulus, coefficient of friction, and wear resistance under controlled laboratory conditions. Instrumental indentation and tribological tests were performed, and results were expressed as mean values with standard deviations calculated from multiple measurements. The results demonstrated that filler composition and surface topography affected material performance. Estelite Asteria exhibited the highest hardness (HIT > 300 MPa), while Enamel Plus HRi showed the highest Young’s modulus (EIT ≈ 14.5 GPa). Materials with more complex surface morphology retained lubricating artificial saliva more effectively, resulting in lower friction coefficients (minimum µ = 0.85), although this did not reduce wear. The highest wear was observed for Estelite Asteria, with a wear scar approximately 62% greater than that of Enamel Plus HRi. These preliminary findings provide a methodological basis for further investigations under more clinically relevant conditions.