Icaritin (ICT) has distinct bioactivities, especially known for its beneficial effects on bone‐related degenerative disorders; however, its pharmacokinetic properties remain unknown. A novel developed UPLC‐MS/MS method for the determination of ICT and its main metabolite glucuronidated icaritin (GICT) was firstly applied to pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies of ICT in female rats, which were intraperitoneally given 40 mg/kg ICT. Following the protein precipitation of plasma samples with acetonitrile, ICT and GICT were separated on a C18 column using gradient elution mode and quantified in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. The linearities were acceptable for ICT (r = 0.9960) and GICT (r = 0.9968), and the lower limit of quantification values was 0.5 and 5 ng/ml, respectively. The accuracy fell in the range of 92.0%–103.1% and precisions were within 9.5%. Good linearity, accuracy, precision, and recovery were achieved for the UPLC‐MS/MS method. ICT was predominantly and rapidly biotransformed to GICT which was slowly eliminated in vivo with a terminal half‐life value of 4.51 hr. Pharmacokinetics of pure ICT eliminated biotransformation interference of Epimedium extract and disclosed genuine pharmacokinetic manner of ICT, as well as firstly elucidated low concentration and bioavailability of ICT in rat plasma.

Background/Aim: To determine the antitumor activities and molecular mechanism of selenium compounds in HeLa cells. Materials and Methods: Western blotting was used to detect ERK and AKT activation in HeLa cells induced by selenium compounds selenomethionine (SeMet), methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys) and methylseleninic acids (MeSeA). Using MTT, wound-healing and Matrigel adhesion assays, the antitumor effects of SAM and selenium compounds were evaluated in HeLa cells. Results: MeSeA inhibited ERK and AKT signaling pathways and suppressed the proliferation (p<0.05 vs. HeLa control), migration (p<0.05 vs. HeLa control) and adhesion (p<0.01 vs. HeLa control) of HeLa cells. MeSeCys and SeMet inhibited AKT signaling pathways and the migration (p<0.05 vs. HeLa control) and adhesion (p<0.01 vs. HeLa control) of HeLa cells. The synergistic action of MeSeA with SAM led to a statistically significant inhibition of proliferation, migration and adhesion of HeLa cells. Conclusion: MeSeA, MeSeCys and SeMet exert different antitumor activities by inhibiting ERK and AKT signaling pathways. The combination of MeSeA and SAM exhibited better antitumor effects compared to the other treatments.