Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumors, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. Oncolytic treatments, particularly oncolytic viruses (OVs), have emerged as promising candidates by selectively infecting and lysing tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity. Various virus-based therapies are under investigation, including genetically engineered herpes simplex virus (HSV), adenovirus, poliovirus, reovirus, vaccinia virus, measles virus, and Newcastle disease virus, each exploiting unique tumor-selective mechanisms. While some, such as HSV-based therapies including G207 and Delytact^TM, have demonstrated clinical progress, significant challenges persist, including immune evasion, heterogeneity in patient response, and delivery barriers due to the blood–brain barrier. Moreover, combination strategies integrating OVs with immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy, and radiation are promising but require further clinical validation. Non-viral oncolytic approaches, such as tumor-targeting bacteria and synthetic peptides, remain underexplored. This review highlights current advancements while addressing critical gaps in the literature, including the need for optimized delivery methods, better biomarker-based patient stratification, and a deeper understanding of GBM’s immunosuppressive microenvironment. Future research should focus on enhancing OV specificity, engineering viruses to deliver therapeutic genes, and integrating OVs with precision medicine strategies. By identifying these gaps, this review provides a framework for advancing oncolytic therapies in GBM treatment.

An outbreak of monkeypox (Mpox) was reported in more than 40 countries in early 2022. Accurate diagnosis of Mpox can be challenging, but history, clinical findings, and laboratory diagnosis can establish the diagnosis. The pre-analytic phase of testing includes collecting, storing, and transporting specimens. It is advised to swab the lesion site with virus transport medium (VTM) containing Dacron or polyester flock swabs from two different sites. Blood, urine, and semen samples may also be used. Timely sampling is necessary to obtain a sufficient amount of virus or antibodies. The analytical phase of infectious disease control involves diagnostic tools to determine the presence of the virus. While polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for detecting Mpox, genome sequencing is for identifying new or modified viruses. As a complement to these methods, isothermal amplification methods have been designed. ELISAassays are also available for the determination of antibodies. Electron microscopy is another effective diagnostic method for tissue identification of the virus. Wastewater fingerprinting provides some of the most effective diagnostic methods for virus identification at the community level. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are further discussed. Post-analytic phase requires proper interpretation of test results and the preparation of accurate patient reports that include relevant medical history, clinical guidelines, and recommendations for follow-up testing or treatment.

Hemophilia A and B are life-threatening congenital bleeding disorders traditionally managed with frequent factor replacement therapies, which are often complicated by breakthrough bleeds and inhibitor development. Marstacimab, a monoclonal antibody that targets TFPI, has emerged as a novel prophylactic treatment, aiming to reduce bleeding episodes in patients without inhibitors. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in multiple electronic databases. A meta-analysis of the extracted data was performed using R language and applied a random-effects model for our analysis. Nine manuscripts were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that Marstacimab significantly reduced the annualized bleeding rate (mean difference: -16.30; 95% CI: [-18.46, -14.15], p < 0.001) and showed a favorable safety profile with most adverse events being mild or moderate, and no thrombotic events reported. Additionally, the use of a prefilled pen injection device further highlighted the therapeutic benefits and ease-of-use of Marstacimab. This meta-analysis reinforces the efficacy and safety of Marstacimab in reducing bleeding rates in patients with severe hemophilia A and B. The findings suggest that Marstacimab provides a promising alternative to conventional factor replacement therapies, supporting its potential as a transformative option in hemophilia management. The study protocol for this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), and it was allocated the PROSPERO identification number CRD42024620215.