Lei Chang

Prof. Lei Chang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 May 2024 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WSWenhuan Song
Wenhuan Song
FHFanxiang Han
Fanxiang Han
ZBZhengyu Bao
Zhengyu Bao
YCYuwei Chai
Yuwei Chai
LWLinlin Wang
Linlin Wang
LCLei Chang
Lei Chang
Mulch is an important measure for improving agricultural productivity in many semiarid regions of the world. However, the impacts of various mulching materials on soil hydrothermal characteristics, enzyme activity, and potato yield in fields have not been comprehensively explored. Thus, a two-growing-season field experiment (2020–2021) with four treatments (SSM, straw strip mulching; PMP, plastic film mulching with large ridge; PMF, double ridge-furrow with full film mulching; and CK, no mulching with conventional planting as the control) was conducted to analyze soil hydrothermal and soil enzyme activities and potato yield on the semiarid Loess Plateau of Northwest China. The results indicated that mulching practices had a positive effect on the soil moisture, with SSM, PMP, and PMF increasing by 7.3%, 9.2%, and 9.2%, respectively, compared to CK. Plastic film mulching significantly increased the soil temperature by 1.3 °C, and straw mulching reduced the soil temperature by 0.7 °C in the 0–30 cm soil layers of the whole growth period. On average, SSM, PMP, and PMF increased soil urease activity in 0–40 cm soil layers by 14.2%, 2.8%, and 2.7%, respectively, and enhanced soil sucrase activity by 19.2%, 8.6%, and 5.7%, respectively, compared with CK. Plastic film mulching increased soil catalase activity by 9.6%, while SSM decreased by 10.1%. Mulching treatments significantly increased tuber yield and water use efficiency based on dry tuber yield (WUE), and SSM, PMP, and PMF increased tuber yield by 18.6%, 31.9%, and 29.7%, enhanced WUE by 50%, 50%, and 57.0% over CK. The correlation analysis revealed that soil moisture was the main factor influencing tuber yield (r = 0.95**). Mulching could improve the soil hydrothermal environment, regulate soil enzyme activities, and promote yield increase. As a sustainable protective mulching measure, straw strip mulching is conducive to improving the ecological environment of farmland and the sustainable development of regional organic agriculture.

23 October 2024 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZMZhen Ma
Zhen Ma
JMJiantao Ma
Jiantao Ma
YCYuwei Chai
Yuwei Chai
WSWenhuan Song
Wenhuan Song
FHFanxiang Han
Fanxiang Han
LCLei Chang
Lei Chang
Mulching could effectively improve the soil hydrothermal environment, improve changes in the soil structure, increase entropy, and conserve soil moisture to solve the problem of grain reduction caused by perennial drought in Northwest China. Thus, a two-growing-season field experiment (2021–2022) with five treatments (PM1, biodegradable plastic film mulching; PM2, plastic film mulching; SM1, straw strip mulching; SM2, crushed corn straw full mulching; and CK, no mulching as the control) was conducted to investigate the effects of different mulching materials on the soil hydrothermal environment, soil aggregate distribution, stability, and tuber yield of rainfed potato farmland in Northwest China. Over two growing seasons, mulching planting, on average, increased (p < 0.05) the soil moisture at the 0–200 cm depth by 9.0% relative to CK (SM2 (11.6%) > SM1 (10.3%) > PM2 (8.6%) > PM1 (7.0%)). The mulching treatments significantly regulated the soil temperature during the whole growth period, in which plastic mulching significantly increased the soil temperature of the 0–25 cm soil depth during the whole growth period by 2.1 °C (PM2 (2.1 °C) > PM1 (2.0 °C)); meanwhile, straw mulching significantly reduced the soil temperature by 1.4 °C (SM2 (0.9 °C) > SM1 (0.6 °C)). All mulching treatments improved the soil macroaggregate content and soil aggregate stability in all soil depths from 0 to 40 cm, with increases of 31.4% and 27.1% in the mean weight diameter (MWD) and 22.6% and 21.2% in the geometric mean diameter (GWD) compared with CK, respectively. Straw and plastic mulching significantly increased the fresh tuber yield by 12.5% and 12.6% compared with CK, respectively. The increases were greatest in SM2 and PM2. Crushed corn straw full mulching is difficult to sow and harvest; therefore, straw strip mulching could improve the soil hydrothermal environment, increase production, and provide an environmentally friendly technology for dryland potato production.

9 February 2023 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PLPengxia Liu
Pengxia Liu
SCShouxi Chai
Shouxi Chai
LCLei Chang
Lei Chang
FZFengwei Zhang
Fengwei Zhang
WSWei Sun
Wei Sun
HLHui Li
Hui Li
The strip mulch of corn straw planting technique is widely used in the Northwest rain-fed agricultural region of China due to the region’s good soil moisture-temperature properties. However, the hydrothermal properties and yield effects of this planting technique on different potato varieties are not clear. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted for two years (2015 and 2016) in the rain-fed area of Northwest China, to study the effects of different mulching treatments on the yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of potato with different maturation characteristics (potato varieties Longshu 7 and LK99). A split-plot experimental design was used. The experiment included corn straw strip flat cover planting (SMF), plastic film mulching (PMF), corn straw strip ditch mulching and ridge planting (SMFR), straw flat fully covered (SMWF), and uncovered and flat planting (CK). The results showed that straw mulch and plastic film mulch had significant effects on yield and WUE (p < 0.05). Compared with CK, SMF significantly increased the yield by 3.75–63.17% in the late-maturing varieties, and increased the yield by 24.96–79.02% in the early-maturing varieties. Among the mulching treatments, compared with SMF, PMF made no significant difference in the yield and WUE between the late-maturing varieties in the normal year and the early-maturing varieties in the dry year, but the yield and WUE of the early-maturing varieties in the normal year significantly decreased by 17.25% and 18.44%, respectively, and the yield and WUE of the late-maturing varieties in the dry year significantly increased by 27.57% and 29.26% respectively. Compared with SMF, SMFR reduced yield by 1.44–13.62%; SMWF decreased the yield of late-maturing varieties by 25.94% (p < 0.05), and WUE decreased by 7.65–23.44% (p < 0.05). It can be seen that under this experimental condition, SMF is more suitable for early-maturing varieties and PMF is more suitable for late-maturing varieties.