This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
The topic of farms that deal with environmental constraints is an ongoing agricultural policy issue, including within the Common Agricultural Policy. We propose empirical evidence based on a sample of Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) farm households, evaluate the influence of chosen factors on financially sustainable farm development and verify less-favoured area (LFA) farms’ growth compared with non-LFA households. To specify farm households, we use the Sustainable Growth Challenge (SGC) model and DuPont decomposition based on financial measures and indicators that were adopted from corporate finance. It is concluded that the differences in SGC and revenue growth values between LFA and non-LFA farms mainly results from the system of subsidising LFA farms that receive compensation for farming in areas with adverse environmental conditions. Generally, the impact of agricultural policies on LFA and non-LFA farms is significant and may weaken the effect on LFA. With the exception of education, other sociodemographic factors do not highly influence farm efficiency. Along with improvements in the quality of human capital (e.g., higher education level), awareness of subsidies, and debt and innovative solutions increases. The interest in precision agriculture and agriculture 4.0 is also growing, which directly translates into better technological and financial efficiency of farms.
Radosław Pastusiak; Michał Soliwoda; Magdalena Jasiniak; Joanna Stawska; Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko. Are Farms Located in Less-Favoured Areas Financially Sustainable? Empirical Evidence from Polish Farm Households. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1092 .
AMA StyleRadosław Pastusiak, Michał Soliwoda, Magdalena Jasiniak, Joanna Stawska, Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko. Are Farms Located in Less-Favoured Areas Financially Sustainable? Empirical Evidence from Polish Farm Households. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (3):1092.
Chicago/Turabian StyleRadosław Pastusiak; Michał Soliwoda; Magdalena Jasiniak; Joanna Stawska; Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko. 2021. "Are Farms Located in Less-Favoured Areas Financially Sustainable? Empirical Evidence from Polish Farm Households." Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1092.
Detailed analysis of Hill [1] based on EU FADN data indicate that the level of “incomes of farms in LFAs was lower than those in non-LFAs, even after including the special payments that the former receive.” The following question arises as to whether being located on less-favored areas may alter significantly the financial efficiency of farms and whether it is possible to identify such measures that would improve financial efficiency at a farm level and preserve the environmental value of the LFA and implement sustainable development policies. The article proposes an analysis of profitability according to criteria regarding being located on LFA, taking into account the peculiarities of production orientation. This is an important issue, not only from a scientific point of view but also an important element for agricultural policy and the issue of subsidies to agricultural holdings located in areas of environmental constraints. We confirmed that in Poland in 2009-2014 the farms located on LFAs significantly differentiate the financial efficiency of farms and are significantly less profitable assets and use financial resources less effectively than farms located in favorable areas. We also proved that farms located on LFAs that specialize in crop productions are described by the highest profitability.
Radosław Pastusiak; Magdalena Jasiniak; Michał Soliwoda; Joanna Stawska. Does Being Located in Less-Favored Areas Weaken the Profitability of Polish Farm Households? Empirical Evidence. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2019, 28, 2331 -2343.
AMA StyleRadosław Pastusiak, Magdalena Jasiniak, Michał Soliwoda, Joanna Stawska. Does Being Located in Less-Favored Areas Weaken the Profitability of Polish Farm Households? Empirical Evidence. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2019; 28 (4):2331-2343.
Chicago/Turabian StyleRadosław Pastusiak; Magdalena Jasiniak; Michał Soliwoda; Joanna Stawska. 2019. "Does Being Located in Less-Favored Areas Weaken the Profitability of Polish Farm Households? Empirical Evidence." Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 28, no. 4: 2331-2343.
Jacek Kulawik; Barbara Wieliczko; Michał Soliwoda; Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa I Gospodarki Zywnosciowej Panstwowy Instytut Badawczy. Is there room for financial instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy? Casus of Poland. The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union – the present and the future EU Member States point of view 2018, 34 -42.
AMA StyleJacek Kulawik, Barbara Wieliczko, Michał Soliwoda, Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa I Gospodarki Zywnosciowej Panstwowy Instytut Badawczy. Is there room for financial instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy? Casus of Poland. The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union – the present and the future EU Member States point of view. 2018; ():34-42.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJacek Kulawik; Barbara Wieliczko; Michał Soliwoda; Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa I Gospodarki Zywnosciowej Panstwowy Instytut Badawczy. 2018. "Is there room for financial instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy? Casus of Poland." The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union – the present and the future EU Member States point of view , no. : 34-42.
Grzegorz Konat; Michał Soliwoda. The Occurrence of Non-Orthodox Approaches in Research on the Impact of Financial Intervention in the Agricultural Sector. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego Finanse Rynki Finansowe Ubezpieczenia 2018, 92, 71 -82.
AMA StyleGrzegorz Konat, Michał Soliwoda. The Occurrence of Non-Orthodox Approaches in Research on the Impact of Financial Intervention in the Agricultural Sector. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego Finanse Rynki Finansowe Ubezpieczenia. 2018; 92 ():71-82.
Chicago/Turabian StyleGrzegorz Konat; Michał Soliwoda. 2018. "The Occurrence of Non-Orthodox Approaches in Research on the Impact of Financial Intervention in the Agricultural Sector." Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego Finanse Rynki Finansowe Ubezpieczenia 92, no. : 71-82.
Artykuł ma dwa zasadnicze cele, po pierwsze, przedstawienie ogólnej sytuacji dochodowej, a także udziału dochodów pozarolniczych w dochodach ogółem gospodarstw rolniczych Kanady i USA (według orientacji produkcyjnej i typu „społeczno-ekonomicznego”), po drugie, dokonanie przeglądu i oceny aktualnych wybranych narzędzi oddziałują - cych na generowanie dochodów pozarolniczych. Szczególnie dla USA znamienny był widoczny spadek udziału dochodów pozarolniczych w dochodach farm i rancz. W ramach polityk rolnych i rozwoju obszaru wiejskich można wyodrębnić narzędzia oddziałujące pośrednio bądź bezpośrednio na generowanie dochodów pozarolniczych, jednak należy przywidywać, że coraz bardziej istotną rolę odgrywać będą instrumenty stymulujące zwiększenie zatrudnienia poza rolnictwem na obszarach wiejskich.
Radosław Pastusiak; Magdalena Jasiniak; Joanna Stawska; Michał Soliwoda. Znaczenie dochodów pozarolniczych w gospodarstwach rolnych Kanady i USA. Wieś i Rolnictwo 2017, 49 -74.
AMA StyleRadosław Pastusiak, Magdalena Jasiniak, Joanna Stawska, Michał Soliwoda. Znaczenie dochodów pozarolniczych w gospodarstwach rolnych Kanady i USA. Wieś i Rolnictwo. 2017; (1 (174)):49-74.
Chicago/Turabian StyleRadosław Pastusiak; Magdalena Jasiniak; Joanna Stawska; Michał Soliwoda. 2017. "Znaczenie dochodów pozarolniczych w gospodarstwach rolnych Kanady i USA." Wieś i Rolnictwo , no. 1 (174): 49-74.
This aim of the article was to provide a multi-faceted presentation of the possibilities of aplication the concept of "safety net" in agriculture in the United States and Canada. Literature review, elements of heuristic methods, and the documentaty method- in comparative terms - were used. . The theoretical basis of the concept of safety nets in agriculture refer to the achievements earned by many schools and streams in economics and finance. An in-depth analysis is based on an "eclectic" and interdisciplinary approach. In practice, the "architecture" of safety nets in agriculture in the U.S. and Canada is quite complex and is based on relationships between the individual components. The role of risk management systems for agriculture will be strengthened. Celem artykuu bya wieloaspektowe przedstawienie moliwoci zastosowania koncepcji „safety net” w rolnictwie USA i Kanady. Wykorzystano metod studiów literaturowych, elementy metod heurystycznych, a take - w ujciu porównawczym - metod dokumentacyjn. Podstawy teoretyczne koncepcji siatek bezpieczestwa w rolnictwie odwouj si do dorobku wypracowanego przez wiele szkó i nurtów ekonomii oraz finansów. Pogbiona ich analiza opiera si na podejciu o charakterze „eklektycznym” i interdyscyplinarnym. W praktyce, „architektura” siatek bezpieczestwa w rolnictwie USA i Kanady jest dosy zoona, opiera si na wspózalenoci midzy poszczególnymi komponentami. Rola systemów zarzdzania ryzykiem w rolnictwie zostanie wzmocniona.
Michał Soliwoda; Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej &#; Państwowy Instytut Badawczy. THE CONCEPT OF “SAFETY NET” AND ITS APPLICATION IN AMERICAN AND CANADIAN AGRICULTURE. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development 2015, 10, 1 .
AMA StyleMichał Soliwoda, Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej &#; Państwowy Instytut Badawczy. THE CONCEPT OF “SAFETY NET” AND ITS APPLICATION IN AMERICAN AND CANADIAN AGRICULTURE. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development. 2015; 10 (2):1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMichał Soliwoda; Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej &#; Państwowy Instytut Badawczy. 2015. "THE CONCEPT OF “SAFETY NET” AND ITS APPLICATION IN AMERICAN AND CANADIAN AGRICULTURE." Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development 10, no. 2: 1.