Background and Objectives: Stress is a significant issue among dental students, with both psychological and physiological impacts affecting their academic performance. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the relationship between academic stress and salivary biochemical markers, specifically cortisol and total antioxidant capacity (TAC), in third- and fifth-year dental students during the 2022/2023 academic year. Materials and Methods: This study included 44 participants from the Faculty of Dental Medicine at Victor Babes University, Romania. Saliva samples were collected during a low-stress period and prior to exams (high-stress period). Results: Cortisol and TAC levels were measured using ELISA and TAC assays, respectively, decreasing from an average of 3.69 (SD ± 1.49) before stress to 2.86 (SD ± 2.28) during high-stress periods (p < 0.05), while salivary cortisol levels showed a non-significant change from 23.69 (SD ± 35.6) ng/mL to 20.44 (SD ± 23.07) ng/mL; additionally, female participants exhibited a mean STAI score of 91.65 (SD ± 5.13) compared to 91.09 (SD ± 9.41) for males, indicating greater stress responses among females. Conclusions: The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores confirmed elevated anxiety levels during exams. The findings suggest that academic stress negatively impacts TAC while triggering a moderate increase in salivary cortisol, underlining the need for stress management interventions in dental education.

Background and Objectives: Halitosis is a common condition with substantial psychosocial impact, frequently driven by intra-oral biofilm, tongue coating, and reduced salivary clearance. This study compared the short-term effectiveness of standardized counseling alone, probiotic lozenges containing Streptococcus salivarius K12, and a zinc-containing mouthrinse in adults with persistent intra-oral halitosis. Materials and Methods: In this 4-week, parallel-group, randomized pragmatic trial, 117 adults with bothersome halitosis for at least 3 months and baseline organoleptic score ≥ 2 were allocated 1:1:1 to standard care, probiotic lozenges, or zinc mouthrinse. All participants received standardized counseling and tongue cleaning instructions. The primary endpoint was change in volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) measured by portable sulfide monitoring. Secondary outcomes included organoleptic score, Halitosis Associated Life-Quality Test (HALT), Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), tongue coating, plaque, and salivary Solobacterium moorei quantified by qPCR. Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics were comparable across groups. All interventions improved outcomes over 4 weeks, but improvements followed a consistent gradient favoring zinc mouthrinse, followed by probiotic lozenges, then standard care. Mean VSC reduction was −12.7 ± 33.9 ppb with standard care, −47.3 ± 42.2 ppb with probiotics, and −78.5 ± 36.3 ppb with zinc mouthrinse (p < 0.001). Organoleptic scores improved by −0.2 ± 0.7, −0.8 ± 0.8, and −1.2 ± 0.8, respectively (p < 0.001). HALT and OHIP-14 scores showed parallel reductions, and moderate/severe halitosis at week 4 remained most frequent in the standard care group (58.9%) and least frequent in the zinc group (20.5%; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Both active adjunctive strategies improved intra-oral halitosis beyond standardized counseling alone, but the zinc-containing mouthrinse produced the greatest short-term benefits across objective, clinician-rated, and patient-reported outcomes. These findings support zinc-based rinses as a practical short-term adjunct for managing persistent intra-oral halitosis in outpatient dental care. Durability after discontinuation and potential relapse beyond 4 weeks were not assessed in this trial.

Background and Objectives: Odontogenic infections (OIs) can progress rapidly and may lead to severe systemic complications, especially in patients with underlying conditions like diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of inflammatory scores—quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII), derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR), and Odontogenic Infection Severity Score (OISS)—in assessing the severity of OIs in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: A case–control study was conducted on 123 patients diagnosed with OIs. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with diabetes (n = 42) and patients who were non-diabetic (n = 81). Inflammatory scores were calculated at admission and correlated with clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The patients with diabetes exhibited significantly higher OISS scores (mean 6.5 ± 2.8) compared to the patients who were non-diabetic (mean 4.8 ± 2.1, p < 0.001). The inflammatory markers qSOFA, SII, and dNLR were significantly elevated in the diabetic group (all p < 0.01). The SII demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for severe OIs in patients with diabetes, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80–0.95). Diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of severe OIs (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.5–6.8, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Inflammatory scores, particularly SII, are effective in predicting the severity of odontogenic infections in patients with diabetes. Incorporating these scores into clinical practice may enhance the early identification of high-risk patients and improve management strategies.

Background/Objectives: Halitosis in geriatric patients is multifactorial, but the joint contribution of prosthetic rehabilitation type and polypharmacy after routine dental procedures has rarely been quantified. We investigated how prosthesis type, polypharmacy, and salivary function were associated with volatile sulfur compound (VSC) burden and self-perceived halitosis in elderly dental patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 88 patients aged ≥65 years, four weeks after completing routine dental procedures. Participants were stratified into three groups: complete denture wearers (n = 30), partial removable denture wearers (n = 28), and fixed prostheses/implants (n = 30). We measured unstimulated salivary flow rate (uSFR), tongue coating index (TCI), denture biofilm index, total VSCs (Halimeter^®), organoleptic score (0–5), and self-perceived halitosis. Polypharmacy, comorbidities, and the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) were recorded. Analyses included one- and two-way ANOVA, Spearman correlations, theory-informed multivariable linear and logistic regression, exploratory mediation analysis, and ROC curves. Results: Forty-two participants (47.7%) reported halitosis. Mean VSC differed across groups (complete dentures 278.2 ± 38.6 ppb; partial 211.2 ± 46.3 ppb; fixed 164.4 ± 43.9 ppb; ANOVA p < 0.001). uSFR correlated inversely with VSC (ρ = −0.61, p < 0.001) and TCI correlated positively (ρ = 0.56, p < 0.001). A significant prosthesis × polypharmacy interaction was observed (F = 3.74, p = 0.029, η²_p = 0.082): polypharmacy was associated with higher VSC most clearly among partial and fixed prostheses wearers, whereas complete denture wearers showed high VSC levels regardless of polypharmacy status. Exploratory mediation findings were consistent with partial indirect association, with 45.9% of the polypharmacy–VSC association statistically explained by reduced uSFR; however, the cross-sectional design precludes causal or temporal interpretation. The full multivariable model showed apparent discrimination for self-perceived halitosis (AUC = 0.92), while the simplified four-item chairside composite model showed AUC = 0.89; neither estimate was optimism-corrected or externally validated. Conclusions: In elderly post-procedure patients, complete denture wearing, polypharmacy, and salivary hypofunction were independently and jointly associated with higher halitosis burden. Reduced salivary flow was consistent with a partial indirect statistical pathway in the polypharmacy–VSC association, supporting hydration counseling and meticulous prosthesis hygiene as low-cost geriatric interventions. Sensitivity analyses excluding implant-supported restorations, participants with MMSE scores of 24–26, and expanded mediation models including TCI and biofilm/plaque did not materially change the main inference.

The interaction between restorative materials and microbial biofilms plays an important role in restoration longevity and the development of secondary caries. This study aimed to perform a multidimensional characterization of four commercially available flowable resin-based dental composites by evaluating their surface roughness, Vickers microhardness, surface morphology, and microbial biofilm formation under standardized in vitro conditions. Filtek™ Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative (3M), Tetric EvoFlow (Ivoclar Vivadent), BRILLIANT Flow (Coltene), and G-ænial™ Universal Injectable (GC) were investigated. Surface roughness was determined by contact profilometry, microhardness was assessed using the Vickers method, and microstructural characteristics were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microbial biofilm biomass formed by Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida albicans, including both reference strains and clinical isolates, was quantified using a crystal violet assay to compare material-dependent microbial colonization. G-ænial™ Universal Injectable exhibited the lowest roughness values, whereas BRILLIANT Flow showed the highest microhardness. SEM analysis revealed a more homogeneous surface morphology for Filtek™ Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative and G-ænial™ Universal Injectable, while Tetric EvoFlow and BRILLIANT Flow displayed increased topographical heterogeneity. Although modest differences in biofilm biomass accumulation were observed among the investigated composites (4.37–12.21% relative biomass reduction compared with the control), no material demonstrated a distinct advantage under the experimental conditions. The integrated evaluation of surface roughness, microhardness, surface morphology, and microbial biofilm formation provides a comparative characterization of commercially available flowable resin-based composites and contributes to a better understanding of material–biofilm interactions. These findings may support the future development of multifunctional restorative biomaterials with improved biofilm-modulating properties.

Background and Objectives: Halitosis is a prevalent oral concern that meaningfully affects oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), yet how active dental treatment is associated with short-term changes in the objective–subjective halitosis–QoL nexus remains poorly quantified. Interpretation is complicated by the multifactorial nature of malodor and by baseline differences between patients selected for different dental procedures. We compared changes in volatile sulfur compound (VSC) emissions, organoleptic ratings, tongue-coating burden, and OHIP-14 across three contrasting treatment modalities and explored whether VSC change statistically accounted for OHRQoL change. Methods: In a non-randomized prospective comparative study, 119 adults (18–67 y) commencing one of three procedures were assessed at baseline and at 8 weeks: scaling and root planing (Group A, n = 42), fixed prosthodontic rehabilitation (Group B, n = 38), or fixed orthodontic appliance bonding (Group C, n = 39). Outcomes included Halimeter^® VSC (ppb), Rosenberg organoleptic score (0–5), Winkel tongue-coating index (TCI), self-perceived halitosis, and OHIP-14 total and seven-domain scores. Mixed-design ANOVA, ANCOVA, prespecified multivariable regression, mediation (5000 bootstrap resamples), receiver operating characteristic analysis, and four-class latent class analysis were performed. A sensitivity-analysis framework including expanded covariate adjustment, propensity-score overlap weighting, and baseline-severity strata was also applied to address residual baseline imbalance. Secondary mediation, ROC, and latent-class analyses were considered exploratory. Results: At 8 weeks, VSCs fell by 116.4 ± 38.7 ppb in Group A and 35.4 ± 29.1 ppb in Group B but rose by 34.3 ± 28.6 ppb in Group C (p < 0.001). OHIP-14 improved by 10.3 and 4.9 points in A and B and worsened by 3.7 in C (p < 0.001). ΔVSC correlated with ΔOHIP-14 (ρ = 0.51, p < 0.001) and most strongly with the psychological discomfort domain (ρ = 0.58). VSC change mediated 35.1% of the periodontal-versus-orthodontic association on QoL (indirect β = −4.7; 95% CI −6.3 to −3.1). Because VSC and OHIP-14 changes were measured over the same interval, mediation was interpreted cautiously. A ΔVSC threshold of −63 ppb predicted clinically meaningful OHIP-14 improvement (AUC = 0.81). Latent class analysis identified four distinct responder phenotypes. The cutoff and responder classes were internally derived and require external validation. Sensitivity analyses preserved the direction of the primary contrasts, but residual confounding remains possible. Conclusions: Treatment modality was associated with the direction and magnitude of halitosis and QoL change, with orthodontic patients constituting a vulnerable subgroup. Targeted oral-hygiene reinforcement during fixed-appliance therapy is warranted.