Introduction: One of the primary objectives of managing microbial content in livestock farming is to control diseases in the respective animals. Nevertheless, the pervasive development of drug‐resistant bacteria is a consequence of the high levels of antibiotic use that are necessary to achieve this objective. This situation exacerbates animal disease and poses a threat to human health. The purpose of this study was to investigate alternative microbial control methods in livestock farming using banana peel extract.Materials & Methods: The antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of peel extracts from unripe and ripe cultivated bananas were examined and compared.Results: The results are notable because they show that the unripe banana peel extracts exhibited significantly better antioxidant activity than the ripe banana peel extracts in 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′‐azino‐bis(3‐ethylbenzothiazoline‐6‐sulfonic acid (ABTS), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) tests. Furthermore, the unripe banana peels showed significant antimicrobial activity in vitro against four bacteria that are commonly found in swine and poultry houses, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, Exiguobacterium indicum, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus siamensis, Bacillus altitudinis, Pantoea ananatis, and Bacillus megaterium. This activity was probably due to their high levels of total phenolic content and total flavonoid content. Then, the spray formulation loaded with the concentrated unripe banana peel extract that was five times higher than the minimum bactericidal concentration was developed and tested. Ethanol, sodium benzoate, tween 80, and glycerine were applied as additives in the spray formulation to increase the extract's solubility and stability. It was found that the developed spray formulation effectively inhibited the growth of S. epidermidis.Conclusion: These research outcomes show that the possible application of banana peel extract is an excellent approach because it is an eco‐friendly alternative to control microorganisms undesired microbial growth in farm animals.

Indoor air pollution poses a significant public health risk, particularly in urban areas, where PM2.5 and airborne contaminants contribute to respiratory diseases. In Thailand, including Chonburi Province, PM2.5 levels frequently exceed safety thresholds, underscoring the urgent need for effective mitigation strategies. To address this challenge, we developed a hybrid air purification system incorporating a bioplastic-based photocatalytic film of polylactic acid (PLA) embedded with titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles. For optimization, PLA films were functionalized with varying TiO₂ concentrations and characterized using SEM, FTIR, TGDTA, and UV–Vis. spectroscopy. A 5 wt% TiO₂ loading was identified as optimal and further enhanced with silver (Ag) nanoparticles to boost photocatalytic efficiency. The Ag/TiO₂/PLA biofilm was fabricated via a compound pellet formulation process followed by blown film extrusion. Various compositions, with and without Ag, were systematically evaluated for photocatalytic performance. The novel customized hybrid air purifier developed in this study is designed to enhance indoor air purification efficiency by integrating Ag/TiO₂/PLA biofilms into a controlled oxidation system. The air purification efficacy of the developed biofilm was evaluated through a controlled study on Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) removal under different treatment conditions: control, adsorption, photolysis, and photocatalytic oxidation. The impact of light intensity on photocatalytic efficiency was also examined. The photocatalytic oxidation of S. aureus was subjected to the first-order kinetic evaluation through mathematical modeling. Results demonstrated that the Ag/TiO₂/PLA biofilm significantly enhances indoor air purification, providing a sustainable, scalable, and energy-efficient solution for microbial decontamination and pollutant removal. This innovative approach outperforms conventional adsorption, adsorption and photocatalytic oxidation systems, offering a promising pathway for improved indoor air quality.

The increased consumption of animal products has led to a proliferation of animal husbandry operations, particularly in agricultural countries. Animal husbandry facilities or livestock farming directly impact the physical, chemical, and biological aspects of the environment, giving rise to various issues such as odors, contamination of water and air sources with pathogens, and potential contamination of meat products originating from these facilities. This research aims to assess the impacts on the physical (temperature, relative humidity and air velocity), chemical (carbon dioxide, total volatile organic compounds and particulate matter), and biological air quality assessment (amount and type of bioaeosols) aspects resulting from pig and poultry farming. The findings will serve as valuable data for managing and addressing these aforementioned issues. It was found that both in poultry and swine houses generated total suspended particles (TSP) and PM10 (Particulate Matter with a diameter of 10 µm or less). Analysis of poultry house exhaust revealed elevated concentrations of TSP and PM10 exceeding established health benchmarks. Chickens tend to produce a higher concentration of VOCs (2.07 ± 0.57 ppm) compared to swine (0.82 ± 0.53 ppm). Staphylococcus epidermidis was predominant bacteria in both swine and poultry houses while Cladosporium sp was the most prevalent fungi in poultry houses. These results in this study are very useful for developing targeted mitigation strategies, products, devices to address specific pollutants produced by each type of livestock, reducing overall environmental impact and improving air quality within and around animal husbandry facilities.Implication Statement: This research highlights how the growing demand for meat is affecting the environment, especially in farming areas. By studying the effects of pig and poultry farming on things like air and water quality, the study shows the challenges these farms pose, like bad smells and pollution. They found that both types of farms release a lot of tiny particles and smelly chemicals into the air, but there are differences between them. Understanding these findings can help us develop ways to reduce the pollution from these farms and make the air cleaner for everyone.