Don Otter

Dr. Don Otter

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2003 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DDDany Doucet
Dany Doucet
DODon Otter
Don Otter
SGSylvie F. Gauthier
Sylvie F. Gauthier
EFE. Allen Foegeding
E. Allen Foegeding

1 February 2015 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSB.H. Schwendel
B.H. Schwendel
TWT.J. Wester
T.J. Wester
PMP.C.H. Morel
P.C.H. Morel
MTM.H. Tavendale
M.H. Tavendale
CDC. Deadman
C. Deadman
DODon Otter
Don Otter
Consumer perception of organic cow milk is associated with the assumption that organic milk differs from conventionally produced milk. The value associated with this difference justifies the premium retail price for organic milk. It includes the perceptions that organic dairy farming is kinder to the environment, animals, and people; that organic milk products are produced without the use of antibiotics, added hormones, synthetic chemicals, and genetic modification; and that they may have potential benefits for human health. Controlled studies investigating whether differences exist between organic and conventionally produced milk have so far been largely equivocal due principally to the complexity of the research question and the number of factors that can influence milk composition. A main complication is that farming practices and their effects differ depending on country, region, year, and season between and within organic and conventional systems. Factors influencing milk composition (e.g., diet, breed, and stage of lactation) have been studied individually, whereas interactions between multiple factors have been largely ignored. Studies that fail to consider that factors other than the farming system (organic vs. conventional) could have caused or contributed to the reported differences in milk composition make it impossible to determine whether a system-related difference exists between organic and conventional milk. Milk fatty acid composition has been a central research area when comparing organic and conventional milk largely because the milk fatty acid profile responds rapidly and is very sensitive to changes in diet. Consequently, the effect of farming practices (high input vs. low input) rather than farming system (organic vs. conventional) determines milk fatty acid profile, and similar results are seen between low-input organic and low-input conventional milks. This confounds our ability to develop an analytical method to distinguish organic from conventionally produced milk and provide product verification. Lack of research on interactions between several influential factors and differences in trial complexity and consistency between studies (e.g., sampling period, sample size, reporting of experimental conditions) complicate data interpretation and prevent us from making unequivocal conclusions. The first part of this review provides a detailed summary of individual factors known to influence milk composition. The second part presents an overview of studies that have compared organic and conventional milk and discusses their findings within the framework of the various factors presented in part one.

20 June 2007 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LGLeyton W. Gapper
Leyton W. Gapper
DCDavid E. J. Copestake
David E. J. Copestake
DODon Otter
Don Otter
HIHarvey E. Indyk
Harvey E. Indyk

1 November 2012 in The Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCaroline Thum
Caroline Thum
ACAdrian L. Cookson
Adrian L. Cookson
DODon Otter
Don Otter
Warren McNabbWarren McNabb
Warren McNabb
AHAlison Hodgkinson
Alison Hodgkinson
NRNicole Roy
Nicole Roy
The gastrointestinal microbiota plays an important role in maintaining host health by preventing the colonization of pathogens, fermenting dietary co

1 May 2000 in Journal of Chromatography A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DEDavid F. Elgar
David F. Elgar
CNCarmen S. Norris
Carmen S. Norris
JAJohn S. Ayers
John S. Ayers
MPMark Pritchard
Mark Pritchard
DODon Otter
Don Otter
KPKate P. Palmano
Kate P. Palmano

1 August 2012 in British Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DODon Otter
Don Otter
Amino acids (AA) are essential nutritional components of a balanced diet and occur in foods in either the free AA form or as the building blocks of proteins. The analysis of AAs in foods is composed of a number of unit operations; the release of the AAs from the food matrix, the separation of the individual AAs and their quantification using calibration standards. Each of these steps has their own idiosyncrasies, e.g. different hydrolysis conditions are required for the optimal release of different AAs and there are a diverse number and type of food matrices, such that most laboratories adapt methods to best suit their applications. There is currently no official standardised method for AA analysis, although the Association of Analytical Communities (AOAC) has validated methods for a number of individual AA components. The established analytical techniques of HPLC (ion exchange or reversed phase) and GC-MS have recently been supplemented by a number of new methods. These include capillary electrophoresis MS and Ultra HPLC-MS, and LC with other detectors. This review will address the intricacies and concerns of the protein hydrolysis step, discuss what specifications or prerequisites need to be placed on the existing and new methods and laboratories using these methods, comment on whether one method can successfully satisfy the exacting requirements of the various unit operations, and finally pose the question ‘Is there any merit in ‘developing’ a validated (e.g. AOAC) official method of analysis for AAs in food?’