This study investigates the effectiveness of the Sibiu Impact Makers program, a 14-week social entrepreneurship initiative at Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, which integrates Design Thinking to develop entrepreneurial competencies among students from the faculties of Economic Sciences, Engineering, as well as Social Sciences and Humanities. Using a quasi-experimental design, the study employed a pre-and-post-analysis based on the EntreComp Framework to assess changes in entrepreneurial competencies, revealing significant post-program improvements. To situate this research within the broader academic landscape, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to identify trends linking Design Thinking and entrepreneurial education. The findings indicate that the program enhances entrepreneurial skills, with impact variations tied to students’ learning styles, as classified by the Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire. However, as a case study with a sample size of 58, findings may have limited generalizability. This research contributes to the discourse on personalized and experiential education, suggesting that integrating Design Thinking with tailored learning strategies can play a vital role in entrepreneurship education.

Higher education is increasingly expected to cultivate the sustainability competences described by the European GreenComp framework, yet empirical evidence linking specific pedagogies to competence-specific change remains limited. This study examined whether participation in “Sibiu Impact Makers” (SIM), an interdisciplinary, Design Thinking-based challenge module, was associated with changes in students’ self-reported GreenComp sustainability competences and LifeComp transversal competences. Using a one-group pre-test/post-test design, 113 undergraduates at Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (Romania) completed a 45-item questionnaire operationalising GreenComp and the complementary LifeComp framework at the beginning and end of the semester; responses were matched through anonymous identifiers. Composite scales showed good-to-excellent reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.70–0.95). Overall GreenComp scores increased with a small effect (Wilcoxon z = −2.47, p = 0.014, dz = 0.21), with the clearest change in “embracing complexity”; critical evaluation of sustainability information and problem framing remained significant after multiplicity correction. LifeComp competences, already high at baseline, remained stable. Exploratory subgroup analyses did not detect statistically significant differences in change across gender, faculty, study year and employment. Because the study lacked a control or comparison group, the observed pre–post changes cannot be attributed causally to the module. The study contributes a competence-specific GreenComp evaluation of an existing interdisciplinary Design Thinking module, highlighting that, within this module, short-term changes were more evident in analytical than in value-oriented sustainability competences.

A substantial proportion of the workers diagnosed with chronic diseases try to find employment or return to work after treatment. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are key actors in this process of work (re)integration alongside other stakeholders, yet their role has been little studied across countries, and almost not at all in Romania. An in-depth exploration of how NGOs are involved in this process was done through semi-structured interviews with eleven officials of Romanian NGOs. Thematic analysis was employed to understand their views regarding: 1) their role in the process; barriers and facilitators for 2) work (re)integration of chronically ill people and regarding 3) their involvement in the process; 4) collaboration with other stakeholders. The results show NGOs play a significant yet informal and irregular role in supporting these people to find or maintain work, mainly due to the lack of a policy framework. Romanian NGOs face legal, structural, and cultural challenges.