The combination of architectural membranes such as ethylene tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) foils and organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells offers a wide range of possibilities for building integration applications. This is due to their flexibility, free-shape, variable color and semitransparency, light weight, cost-effectivity, and low environmental impact. In addition, electrical generation is provided. Four configurations of ETFE foils designed to be integrated onto a south façade glazing element were studied for two representative European locations with different climatic conditions: Barcelona and Paris. These configurations comprise a reference one based on a double ETFE foil with a 10 mm air gap in between, and the other three incorporate on the inner ETFE foil either OPV cells covering 50% or 100% of its surface or a shading pattern printed on it covering 50% of its surface. Results show that, in terms of energy, the configuration with higher OPV coverage area is the one achieving the lowest net energy consumption in both locations. However, when looking at the illumination comfort this option results in insufficient illumination levels. Therefore, a tradeoff strategy balancing energy performance and illumination comfort conditions is necessary. Based on that, the best solution found for both cities is the configuration integrating OPV cells covering 50% of the glazing area and for a window to wall ratio of 0.45.

A novel concentrating photovoltaic-thermal solar collector was designed, fabricated and experimentally investigated at the University of Lleida, in Spain. Two designs based on two dielectric liquids, isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and deionised water (DIW), were developed. In both cases, the solar cells were directly liquid-immersed. The study includes experiments and numerical simulations. The proposed concentrator was incorporated into a testing unit to examine its potential as a façade by controlling light and thermal flux transmitted into a building. The results show promising electrical performance and acceptable thermal performance, with thermal losses ranging from 14 to 20 W °C⁻¹m⁻². The optical efficiency was around 73% in the case of the concentrator with DIW and about 76% for the one with IPA. Regarding electrical performance, the fill factors for IPA and DIW configurations are as follows: 62.8% and 61.7%, respectively. The comparison results reveal striking differences between the testing unit with and without solar concentrators, with the concentrator-equipped unit showing around four times lower illuminance and a 50% reduction in maximum heat fluxes and interior temperature. Generally speaking, it can be said that these energy-generating façades show satisfactory behaviour and offer interesting possibilities for building-integrated applications.