Malaysia is an endemic hot spot for melioidosis; however, a comprehensive picture of the burden of disease, clinical presentations, and challenges faced in diagnosis and treatment of melioidosis is not available. This review provides a nonexhaustive overview of epidemiological data, clinical studies, risk factors, and mortality rates from available literature and case reports. Clinical patterns of melioidosis are generally consistent with those from South and Southeast Asia in terms of common primary presentations with diabetes as a major risk factor. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of Malaysian patients is a key limiting factor, which needs to be addressed to reduce serious complications and high mortality and recurrence rates. Promoting awareness among the local healthcare personnel is crucial to improving diagnostics and early treatment, as well as educating the Malaysian public on disease symptoms and risk factors. A further matter of urgency is the need to make this a notifiable disease and the establishment of a national melioidosis registry. We also highlight local studies on the causative agent, Burkholderia pseudomallei, with regards to bacteriology and identification of virulence factors as well as findings from host–pathogen interaction studies. Collectively, these studies have uncovered new correlations and insights for further understanding of the disease.

Melioidosis, also known as Whitmore’s disease, is a potentially fatal infection caused by the Gram-negative bacteria Burkholderia pseudomallei with a mortality rate of 10–50%. The condition is a “glanders-like” illness prevalent in Southeast Asian and Northern Australian regions and can affect humans, animals, and sometimes plants. Melioidosis received the epithet “the great mimicker” owing to its vast spectrum of non-specific clinical manifestations, such as localised abscesses, septicaemia, pneumonia, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and encephalomyelitis, which often lead to misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. To date, antibiotics remain the backbone of melioidosis treatment, which includes intravenous therapy with ceftazidime or meropenem, followed by oral therapy with TMP-SMX or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and supported by adjunctive treatment. However, bacteria have developed resistance to a series of antibiotics, including clinically significant ones, during treatment. Therefore, phage therapy has gained unprecedented interest and has been proposed as an alternative treatment. Although no effective phage therapy has been published, the findings of experimental phage therapies suggest that the concept could be feasible. This article reviews the benefits and limitations of antibiotics and phage therapy in terms of established regimens, bacterial resistance, host specificity, and biofilm degradation.

Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, is intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. Ceftazidime (CAZ), the syntheticβ-lactam, is normally used as the first-line antibiotic therapy for treatment of melioidosis. However, acquired CAZ resistance can developin vivoduring treatment with CAZ, leading to mortality if therapy is not switched to a different antibiotic(s) in a timely manner. In this study, susceptibilities of 81B. pseudomalleiisolates to nine different antimicrobial agents were determined using the disk diffusion method, broth microdilution test and Etest. Highest percentage of susceptibility was demonstrated to CAZ, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, meropenem, imipenem, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Although these drugs demonstrated the highest percentage of susceptibility inB. pseudomallei, the overall results underline the importance of the emergence of resistance in this organism. PCR results showed that, of the 81B. pseudomallei, six multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates carriedbpeB,amrB, andBPSS1119andpenAgenes. Genotyping of the isolates using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis showed six different PCR fingerprinting patterns generated from the six MDR isolates clusters (A) and eight PCR fingerprinting patterns generated for the remaining 75 non-MDR isolates clusters (B).

Non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (NC-CRKP) confers carbapenem resistance through a combination of chromosomal mutations and acquired non-carbapenemase resistance mechanisms. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and molecular profiles of NC-CRKP isolated from patients in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia from January 2013 to October 2019. During the study period, 54 NC-CRKP-infected/colonised patients’ isolates were obtained. Clinical parameters were assessed in 52 patients. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate among NC-CRKP patients was 46.2% (24/52). Twenty-three (44.2%) patients were infected, while others were colonised. Based on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, 92.3% (48/52) of the infected/colonised patients had a score of ≥ 1. Resistance genes found among the 54 NC-CRKP isolates were bla_TEM, bla_SHV, bla_CTX-M, bla_OXA, and bla_DHA. Porin loss was detected in 25/54 (46.3%) strains. None of the isolated strains conferred carbapenem resistance through the efflux pumps system. In conclusion, only 25/54 (46.3%) NC-CRKP conferred carbapenem resistance through a combination of porin loss and the acquisition of non-carbapenemase resistance mechanisms. The carbapenem resistance mechanisms for the remaining strains (53.7%) should be further investigated as rapid identification and distinction of the NC-CRKP mechanisms enable optimal treatment and infection control efforts.