Drug interactions are a significant and integral part of the concept of medication-related adverse events, whether referring to potential interactions or those currently observed in real-world conditions. The high global consumption of antibiotics and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms make antibiotic-drug interactions a key element that requires continuous study due to their clinical relevance. In the present work, the current state of knowledge on antibiotic-drug interactions, which are less studied than other drug-drug interactions despite their frequent use in acute settings, has been consolidated and updated. The focus was on the interactions of the commonly used antibiotics in clinical practice, on the characteristics of the geriatric population susceptible to interactions, and on the impact of online drug interaction checkers. Additionally, strategies for optimizing the management of these interactions, including spacing out administrations, monitoring, or avoiding certain combinations, are suggested. Sustained research and careful monitoring are critical for improving antibiotic safety and efficacy, especially in susceptible populations, to enhance precision in managing antibiotic-drug interactions.

Imaging is an important tool in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). Echocardiography is an essential examination, especially in native valve endocarditis (NVE), but its diagnostic accuracy is reduced in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). The diagnostic ability is superior for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), but a negative test cannot exclude PVE. Both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TEE can provide normal or inconclusive findings in up to 30% of cases, especially in patients with prosthetic devices. New advanced non-invasive imaging tests are increasingly used in the diagnosis of IE. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques have demonstrated their superiority over TEE for the diagnosis of PVE and cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). Cardiac computed tomography angiography imaging is useful in PVE cases with inconclusive TTE and TEE investigations and for the evaluation of paravalvular complications. In the present review, imaging tools are described with their values and limitations for improving diagnosis in NVE, PVE and CIED-IE. Current knowledge about multimodality imaging approaches in IE and imaging methods to assess the local and distant complications of IE is also reviewed. Furthermore, a potential diagnostic work-up for different clinical scenarios is described. However, further studies are essential for refining diagnostic and management approaches in infective endocarditis, addressing limitations and optimizing advanced imaging techniques across different clinical scenarios.

Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) often coexists with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), complicating treatment decisions. Current guidelines suggest complete revascularization (CR), yet robust evidence in hemodynamically stable patients remains insufficient. However, the comparative benefit of CR over incomplete revascularization (IR) in reducing ischemic events and improving cardiac function in this population is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CR on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and ischemic readmissions at 6 and 12 months, as the composite primary outcome, and to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement at discharge and hospital length of stay, as secondary outcomes. A total of 282 hemodynamically stable NSTE-ACS patients with MVD were included, of whom 218 (77.3%) underwent CR and 64 (22.7%) IR. The primary composite outcome occurred in 40.6% of IR patients versus 11.0% in the CR group at 6 months (p < 0.001), and 68.8% vs. 22.0% at 12 months (p < 0.001). CR was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause and cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. Stroke incidence was similar. Event-free survival favored CR. Multivariable analysis identified CR and baseline LVEF as independent predictors of 12-month outcomes (HR for CR: 7.797; 95% CI: 3.961–15.348; p < 0.001; HR for LVEF: 0.959; CI: 0.926–0.994; p = 0.021). These findings strongly support CR as the preferred therapeutic strategy. Future prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm the results.