Objective: To explore the impact of ethnic and socioeconomic disparities on diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care and outcomes, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches tailored to diverse patient populations. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed 1409 patients hospitalized with DFUs between 2016 and 2023 at a tertiary medical center. Data extracted from electronic medical records included demographics, socioeconomic status (SES), clinical variables, and healthcare utilization. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Chi-Square and Kruskal–Wallis tests, and a regularized logistic regression model to identify predictors of mortality and disparities in treatment access. Results: Arab patients had significantly lower SES (median score: 3.00) compared to Jewish patients (median score: 8.00), resulting in reduced healthcare access and worse clinical outcomes. Arab patients were diagnosed with diabetes at a younger age (57 years vs. 68 years for Jewish patients) and exhibited a higher body mass index (30.36 vs. 28.68, p < 0.05). Despite similar mortality rates between groups (21.52% vs. 22.83%, p = 0.65), differences in healthcare utilization were evident, particularly in younger patients (18–59 years) within the internal medicine department (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the need for a personalized approach to diabetic foot care, integrating socioeconomic and demographic factors into treatment plans. Ethnic minorities with lower SES, earlier diabetes onset, and higher BMI may require tailored intervention strategies to optimize prevention, access to specialized care, and adherence to treatment. Addressing individualized patient needs through precision medicine and culturally adapted healthcare models can improve outcomes and reduce disparities in DFU management.

Cases: Three patients (61-81 years) experienced abrupt shoulder pain and functional decline more than 5 months after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) using a monoblock central-screw baseplate in graft-reconstructed glenoids. Imaging revealed central screw breakage with variable baseplate displacement. Two underwent successful revision with restoration of stable fixation; in the third, revision was deferred for medical comorbidities. Conclusion: Central screw breakage is an important marker of glenoid fixation failure after RTSA. These cases suggest an association with graft-dependent baseplate fixation, limited native bone support, and consequently late fatigue failure. Prompt diagnosis and timely management are essential.