Background and Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effects of manual therapy (MT) and home exercise (HE) treatments on pain, sleep quality, stress level, and quality of life in patients with bruxism. Materials and Methods: The study included 30 bruxism patients ages 18–25 years who were randomly divided into the manual therapy group (MTG) and home exercise group (HEG). Before treatment (T1), all patients were asked to fill out the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI), and Quality of Life Scale/Short Form-36 (SF-36), and additionally, the number of trigger points (NTP) and pain levels were determined. MT and HE were applied for 8 weeks, and all tests were repeated at the end of treatment (T2). A paired-samples t test was used for intra-group comparisons at T1 and T2, and an independent t test was used for inter-group comparisons. The statistical significance level was accepted as p < 0.05. Results: When the results obtained with MT and HE were examined after 8 weeks of treatment, a significant difference was found for all parameters (FAI, PSQI, PSS, SF-36, NTP, activity pain, and night pain levels, p < 0.05) except rest pain in HEG. According to the inter-group comparison, a significant difference was found in PSQI, FAI, and NTP (p < 0.05). However, it was determined that both groups showed statistically similar effects in terms of pain, perceived stress, and quality of life (p > 0.05). Conclusions: MT and HE reduce perceived stress and pain intensity and also improve quality of life and sleep in patients with bruxism. HE is as effective as MT in terms of pain, stress quality of life. MT is more effective than HE in improving sleep quality and TMD symptoms. Both manual therapy and home exercise applications can be applied as alternative treatment methods in the treatment of bruxism.

Background/Objectives: Mandibular counterclockwise (CCW) autorotation following maxillary repositioning is a common biomechanical consequence of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. However, its effect on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether condyle-centered CCW mandibular autorotation influences postoperative TMJ spaces and condylar morphology using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A total of 24 patients who underwent combined Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into two groups based on virtual surgical planning: those with condyle-centered CCW autorotation (4–7°) and those without autorotation. Preoperative and one-year postoperative CBCT images were analyzed. Sagittal and coronal joint spaces, condylar dimensions, and glenoid fossa thickness were measured. Intra- and intergroup comparisons were performed using nonparametric statistical tests (α = 0.05). Results: Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative reductions in condylar height, width, and depth, reflecting adaptive bone remodeling. Joint space changes were limited overall. A significant intergroup difference was observed only in the change in the right superior joint space (p = 0.024), which decreased in the non-autorotation group but was preserved or slightly increased in the autorotation group. No other joint space or fossa parameter showed significant between-group differences. Conclusions: Condyle-centered CCW mandibular autorotation during bimaxillary orthognathic surgery does not induce adverse TMJ morphological changes beyond physiological adaptation. Preservation of the superior joint space suggests that autorotation may contribute to maintaining a more favorable condyle–fossa relationship. Incorporating controlled mandibular autorotation into surgical planning may support TMJ biomechanical balance and postoperative joint stability.

The aim of this study was to evaluate orthodontic treatment method preferences among dentistry students, dentists and orthodontic residents taking into account factors such as esthetics, advantage/disadvantage, cost and treatment duration. The study was carried out on three groups: dentistry students (n=318), dentists (n=110) and orthodontic residents (n=98), and a 17-question survey was applied. Questionnaire forms included informational photos of conventional metal brackets (CMB), esthetic ceramic brackets (ECB), self-ligating brackets (SLB), clear aligner (CA), and lingual brackets (LB). The participants' preferences for orthodontic treatment methods were evaluated using chi-square analysis, not only between groups but also considering gender and income level. Regarding esthetics, dentists (41%) and orthodontic residents (78%) mostly preferred CA, while dentistry students mostly preferred LB (44%). With regard to advantage/disadvantage, dentistry students (31%) and dentists (39%) mostly preferred SLB, while orthodontic residents mostly preferred CA (55%). Regarding the success of the treatment, all three groups mostly preferred CMB. (respectively 50%; 47%; 72%). While CA was mostly preferred for short-term treatments in all three groups (respectively 40%; 71%; 88%), CMB was mostly preferred for long-term treatments (respectively 35%, 51%, 55%). Gender and income-level differences had little effect on orthodontic treatment method preferences. Except for long-term treatments and treatment success, there was generally great interest in CA, especially among orthodontic residents. Ceramic brackets and LB were generally the least preferred treatment methods among dentistry students, dentists, and orthodontic residents.

Background/Objectives: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) allows three-dimensional assessment of complex dentofacial deformities and has become integral to modern orthognathic surgery. However, evidence remains limited regarding how skeletal characteristics and malocclusion patterns translate into surgical movement selection. This study aimed to evaluate demographic features, skeletal malocclusion patterns, and clinical treatment strategies in patients undergoing VSP-guided orthognathic surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 158 patients who underwent VSP-assisted orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2025. Sagittal skeletal classification, vertical growth pattern, facial asymmetry, and maxillary crossbite were evaluated together with planned maxillary and mandibular movements. Surgical procedures were analyzed according to skeletal malocclusion classes (Class I, II, and III). Group comparisons were performed using chi-square and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess factors associated with bimaxillary surgery (p < 0.05). Results: Skeletal Class I malocclusion was most prevalent (46.8%), followed by Class III (29.7%) and Class II (23.4%). Hyperdivergent growth patterns were predominantly observed in Class II patients, whereas normodivergent patterns were most common in Class III cases (p < 0.05). Mandibular advancement and setback generally followed expected class-based trends but were also observed across non-corresponding skeletal classes. Maxillary impaction and mandibular autorotation were frequently incorporated. Bimaxillary surgery was performed in 84.2% of cases. Logistic regression analysis showed no independent predictors of bimaxillary surgery (p > 0.05). Conclusions: VSP-assisted orthognathic surgery demonstrates that surgical planning cannot be reduced to sagittal skeletal classification alone. Treatment decisions are shaped by combined sagittal, vertical, transverse, and patient-specific factors, supporting a multidimensional and individualized planning approach.

Background/Objectives: Le Fort I osteotomy is a widely performed surgical procedure for correcting maxillary deformities, but it carries the risk of rare complications, including nasolacrimal duct (NLD) injury. This study evaluated the anatomical relationship between the nasolacrimal canal (NLC) and the maxilla across different skeletal patterns via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to define safer zones for fixation during orthognathic surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 76 patients (152 canals) scheduled for orthognathic surgery. The participants were classified into retrognathic, orthognathic, and prognathic groups based on SNA values. Four linear distances were measured on sagittal CBCT sections: from the superior (SL), middle (ML), and inferior (IL) points of the NLD to the anterior maxillary border and from the canine apex to the inferior NLC point (IC). A total of 608 measurements were analyzed via ANOVA, the Kruskal–Wallis test, and post hoc tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The ML distance was significantly greater in the prognathic group than in the retrognathic and orthognathic groups (p < 0.001). The IL distance was significantly shorter in retrognathic individuals (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in SL (p = 0.063) or IC (p = 0.141) among the groups. Conclusions: The proximity of the NLC to the maxilla varies according to the skeletal pattern. The retrognathic maxilla results in shorter IL distances, suggesting increased risk during fixation, whereas the prognathic maxilla results in greater ML distances. Preoperative CBCT-based individualized evaluation is recommended to optimize fixation and reduce NLD injury risk in Le Fort I osteotomy.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate pretreatment osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in orthognathic surgery patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to determine the distribution of the findings according to sagittal skeletal malocclusion groups. Methods: CBCT images of 103 patients (206 condyles) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as Class I, II, and III based on ANB angles. Condylar morphology was assessed for flattening, sclerosis, erosion, osteophyte formation, and subchondral bone cysts. All evaluations were performed by a single investigator (κ = 0.87). Group differences were analyzed using the chi-square test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). Results: The most frequent alteration was flattening (29.6%), followed by sclerosis (11.2%), erosion (10.7%), osteophyte formation (8.3%), and subchondral bone cysts (4.4%). No significant sex-related differences were found (p > 0.05). A significant difference was observed only in sclerosis (p = 0.049), which was more prevalent in Class I than Class III. Flattening predominated in all groups, while erosion and osteophytes were more common in Class II, and sclerosis was more frequent in Class I. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that condylar flattening was the most common morphological alteration in orthognathic patients across all skeletal malocclusion groups. The higher prevalence of sclerosis in Class I compared with Class III suggests that mandibular positioning may influence adaptive and degenerative remodeling processes of the TMJ. This study emphasizes the importance of CBCT evaluation for detecting osseous changes in TMJ before orthognathic surgery and demonstrates that pre-existing alterations may impact surgical stability and postoperative functional outcomes.