Background: An adequate OSCC macroscopic resection margin (MRM) is essential for effective treatment. This study analyzed the effects of formalin fixation (FF) on the MRM. Material and Methods: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in this study. Tumors from the floor of the mouth (FOM; n = 23), the tongue (TC; n = 10), and the maxilla (MT; n = 9) were studied. A 3D scanner was used to create virtual models, and further analysis was conducted according to the established protocol. Results: The most significant shrinkage was observed in the TC (MRM n = 121; Med. = 1.5 mm; p val. = 7.05 × 10⁻¹⁸), with a maximum shrinkage of 28%. For the FOM (n = 262; Med. = 0.8 mm; p val. = 6.76 × 10⁻¹⁸), the greatest MRM shrinkage was 26%. In the MT group (n = 91; Med. = 0.9 mm; p val. = 2.69 × 10⁻⁹), the shrinkage was 18.7%. Among MRMs >8 mm (n = 159), FF led to 58.5% of them shrinking to ≤8 mm, resulting in a false decrease in the safe MRM (p val. = 1.11 × 10⁻²⁷). Overall, the average shrinkage for all specimens was μ= 2.57 mm (p val. = 8.89 × 10⁻¹⁰) alongside and μ= 2.35 mm (p val. = 4.09 × 10⁻⁶) across. The tumors themselves showed minimal changes: μ= 0.69 mm (p val. = 9.73 × 10⁻³) alongside and μ= 0.8 mm (p val. = 2.52 × 10⁻⁷) across. Conclusion: Formalin fixation (FF) caused the shrinkage of the OSCC MRM, particularly in tongue cancers. Even after proper surgical excision in the postoperative results, the number of normal MRMs was underestimated. This should be considered when interpreting the results of surgical treatment. However, FF had a minimal impact on the overall shrinkage of the tumors themselves.

Background: The histopathological assessment is critical in the comprehensive treatment process for patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A detailed and precise specimen characterization is essential to facilitate effective surgeon–pathologist communication. Methods: In response to this need, a user-friendly virtual communication protocol utilizing a 3D scanner has been developed. This study involved 50 patients with OSCC, whose resected tumors were directly scanned in the operating room and subsequently annotated and characterized using available software. Results: The direct application of annotations and descriptions onto the virtual tumor specimens significantly enhanced the quantity and accuracy of information conveyed to the pathologist. Conclusions: The proposed solution’s repeatability and standardized approach make integration into routine clinical practice feasible, thereby establishing a potential new standard in the field.

Background: Accidents involving the maxillofacial area are sudden and unforeseen, such as traffic accidents and physical altercations. The COVID-19 pandemic was a critical threat to the public in aspects not only involving physical health but also those affecting psychological health due to isolation, leading to a higher incidence of stress and depression among the general population and specifically in patients with OMF trauma. This study assessed the relationship between the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the quantity and severity of maxillofacial injuries. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Clinical Centre in Gdansk from March 2019 to August 2023. Results: There was an increased risk of injury occurrence to the condylar process of the mandible, especially the left side, Le Fort type II/III fractures, injuries of the maxillary alveolar process, and displacement of the upper facial mass. Simultaneously, a decreased occurrence of certain injuries i.e., Le Fort type III fractures and Le Fort type I/II fractures, was recorded. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an increased occurrence of high-energy injuries, including displacement of the upper facial mass (p = 0.010).

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains the seventh most common cancer worldwide, characterized by late-stage diagnosis and poor 5-year survival rates. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent subtype. The identification of robust diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers is essential for personalized treatment monitoring. Methods: Following PRISMA and PICO standards, we conducted a comprehensive review of studies published over the past 10 years across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The selection process was facilitated by AI-powered tools (Rayyan QCRI), and study quality was assessed using NOS or QUIPS. Results: 34 articles (including meta-analyses and original trials) were identified. Established clinical markers, such as p16-positivity (HR ≈ 0.55) and PD-L1 (CPS), remain significant. However, the molecular landscape is expanding to include high-risk lncRNA signatures (HR ≈ 2.50), immune checkpoints such as TIGIT (HR ≈ 1.85), and genomic alterations, including IL-10 promoter polymorphisms. We highlight that epigenetic silencing of p16 affects only about 25% of patients, while metabolic regulators (e.g., GLUT-1) and protein markers (e.g., MASPIN) offer critical predictive value for therapy response. Conclusions: The diagnostic and predictive paradigm is shifting toward a multi-omic approach that integrates DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolic indicators. Future clinical use will rely on AI-driven multimarker panels and non-invasive liquid biopsies to enable real-time monitoring and de-escalation of treatment strategies.

Background/Objectives: Oral mucosal melanoma is rare and associated with poor prognosis. This study aims to identify clinical and molecular factors influencing survival by synthesizing published cases together with one original case. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. Relevant clinical, histopathological, and follow-up parameters were compared across studies. Results: A total of 21 publications describing 42 patients were reviewed, and the data were aggregated with our patient, yielding 43 patients in total. Our case describing a 66-year-old male with 14 years of disease-free survival despite multiple excisions illustrated the potential for long-term survival despite poor prognosis. Favorable prognostic indicators listed in the literature included preserved expression of BAP1, p53, BCL2, and p16, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, smaller tumor size and thickness, and the absence of vascular invasion. Longer follow-up periods were most often observed in younger patients without lymphadenopathy, distant metastasis, or local recurrence. Conclusions: This review highlights prognostic features in oral mucosal melanoma but also underscores exceptions, demonstrating that survival cannot be fully explained by current clinical and molecular criteria.

Radiological diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the main steps in treatment planning. T (tumor size), DOI (depth of invasion) (AJCC 8th edition), and nodal metastases (N+) were evaluated using CT and MRI to assess the most effective imaging method. The effectiveness of the radiological imaging methods was compared with histopathological results. Imaging diagnostic studies were performed and retrospectively analyzed in 125 patients with OSCC (CT n = 54 and MRI n = 71). Histopathology evaluated T, DOI, and N+. The radiological T results of CT in comparison with histopathological examination showed agreement in 62.5% of cases for T1, 56.25% for T2, 25% for T3, and 42.8% for T4 (p-value = 0.07), and regarding MRI, 52.2% for T1, 36.4% for T2, 33.3% in T3, and 33.3% for T4. The DOI results of CT and MRI juxtaposed against the histopathological findings were as follows: for CT, n = 18 for DOI ≤ 10 mm and n = 36 for >10 mm; for MRI, n = 29 for DOI ≤ 10 mm and n = 42 for >10 mm (DOI CT vs. DOI hist. pat. p-value = 0.23; DOI MRI vs. DOI hist. pat. p-value = 0.006). Regarding nodal metastasis, n = 21 for N0 and n = 32 for N+ for CT (p-value = 0.02), and n = 49 for N0 and n = 22 for N+ for MRI (p-value = 0.1). In the radiological N+ group, the histopathological findings coincided with the results of MRI and CT in 27% and 62.5% of cases, respectively (N0: 83.6% for MRI; 85.7% for CT). Upon evaluating T, a decreasing percentage of overlapping results with an increasing tumor size was observed. The accuracy of both imaging studies was at a similar level, with a slight advantage for MRI. Among the patients on whom CT was performed, DOI analysis did not show statistically significant differences. This led to the conclusion that, in most cases, the DOI results based on CT overlapped with those described via histopathological examination. However, among the group of patients with MRI as the imaging method of choice, the differences proved to be statistically significant (p-value = 0.006). The results of this study indicate that CT is a more accurate method for DOI assessment. The results of the radiologic metastasis evaluation (N+ group) overlapped more in the CT group, while the percentage of corresponding results in the radiologic N0 vs. hist. pat. N0 group was high and similar in both groups. These results indicate that it is easier to confirm the absence of a metastasis than its presence.