Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is commonly used in the immunotherapy of bladder cancer (BlCa) but its effectiveness is limited to only a fraction of patients. To identify the factors that regulate the response of human BlCa tumor microenvironment (TME) to BCG, we used the ex vivo whole-tissue explant model. The levels of COX2 in the BCG-activated explants closely correlated with the local production of Treg- and MDSCS attractants and suppressive factors, while the baseline COX2 levels did not have predictive value. Accordingly, we observed that BCG induced high levels of MDSC- and Treg-attracting chemokines (CCL22, CXCL8, CXCL12) and suppressive factors (IDO1, IL-10, NOS2). These undesirable effects were associated with the nuclear translocation of phosphorylated NFκB, induction of COX2, the key enzyme controlling PGE₂ synthesis, and elevation of a PGE₂ receptor, EP4. While NFκB blockade suppressed both the desirable and undesirable components of BCG-driven inflammation, the inhibitors of PGE₂ synthesis (Celecoxib or Indomethacin) or signaling (EP4-selective blocker, ARY-007), selectively eliminated the induction of MDSC/Treg attractants and immunosuppressive factors but enhanced the production of CTL attractants, CCL5, CXCL9 and CXCL10. PGE₂ blockade allowed for the selectively enhanced migration of CTLs to the BCG-treated BlCa samples and eliminated the enhanced migration of Tregs. Since the balance between the CTLs and suppressive cells in the TME predicts the outcomes in patients with BlCa and other diseases, our data help to elucidate the mechanisms which limit the effectiveness of BCG therapies and identify new targets to enhance their therapeutic effects.

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a common cancer with high mortality in men due to its heterogeneity and the emergence of drug resistance. A critical factor contributing to its lethality is the presence of prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs), which can self-renew, long-term propagate tumors, and mediate treatment resistance. MicroRNA-34a (miR-34a) has shown promise as an anti-PCSC therapeutic by targeting critical molecules involved in cancer stem cell (CSC) survival and functions. Despite extensive efforts, the development of miR-34a therapeutics still faces challenges, including non-specific delivery and delivery-associated toxicity. One emerging delivery approach is ligand-mediated conjugation, aiming to achieve specific delivery of miR-34a to cancer cells, thereby enhancing efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Folate-conjugated miR-34a (folate–miR-34a) has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in breast and lung cancers by targeting folate receptor α (FOLR1). Here, we first show that miR-34a, a TP53 transcriptional target, is reduced in PCa that harbors TP53 loss or mutations and that miR-34a mimic, when transfected into PCa cells, downregulated multiple miR-34a targets and inhibited cell growth. When exploring the therapeutic potential of folate–miR-34a, we found that folate–miR-34a exhibited impressive inhibitory effects on breast, ovarian, and cervical cancer cells but showed minimal effects on and targeted delivery to PCa cells due to a lack of appreciable expression of FOLR1 in PCa cells. Folate–miR-34a also did not display any apparent effect on PCa cells expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PMSA) despite the reported folate’s binding capability to PSMA. These results highlight challenges in the specific delivery of folate–miR-34a to PCa due to a lack of target (receptor) expression. Our study offers novel insights into the challenges and promises within the field and casts light on the development of ligand-conjugated miR-34a therapeutics for PCa.

Regulatory approval of next generation sequencing (NGS) by the FDA is advancing the use of genomic-based precision medicine for the therapeutic management of cancer as standard care. Recent FDA guidance for the classification of genomic variants based on clinical evidence to aid clinicians in understanding the actionability of identified variants provided by comprehensive NGS panels has also been set forth. In this retrospective analysis, we interpreted and applied the FDA variant classification guidance to comprehensive NGS testing performed for advanced cancer patients and assessed oncologist agreement with NGS test treatment recommendations. NGS comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in a CLIA certified lab (657 completed tests for 646 patients treated at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center) between June 2016 and June 2017. Physician treatment recommendations made within 120 days post-test were gathered from tested patients’ medical records and classified as targeted therapy, precision medicine clinical trial, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy/radiation, surgery, transplant, or non-therapeutic (hospice, surveillance, or palliative care). Agreement between NGS test report targeted therapy recommendations based on the FDA variant classification and physician targeted therapy treatment recommendations were evaluated. Excluding variants contraindicating targeted therapy (i.e., KRAS or NRAS mutations), at least one variant with FDA level 1 companion diagnostic supporting evidence as the most actionable was identified in 14% of tests, with physicians most frequently recommending targeted therapy (48%) for patients with these results. This stands in contrast to physicians recommending targeted therapy based on test results with FDA level 2 (practice guideline) or FDA level 3 (clinical trial or off label) evidence as the most actionable result (11 and 4%, respectively). We found an appropriate “dose-response” relationship between the strength of clinical evidence supporting biomarker-directed targeted therapy based on application of FDA guidance for NGS test variant classification, and subsequent treatment recommendations made by treating physicians. In view of recent changes at FDA, it is paramount to define regulatory grounds and medical policy coverage for NGS testing based on this guidance.

Summary Introduction Proteasome inhibition is an established therapy for many malignancies. Carfilzomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor, was combined with irinotecan to provide a synergistic approach in relapsed, irinotecan-sensitive cancers. Materials and Methods Patients with relapsed irinotecan-sensitive cancers received carfilzomib (Day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16) at three dose levels (20/27 mg/m2, 20/36 mg/m2 and 20/45 mg/m2/day) in combination with irinotecan (Days 1, 8 and 15) at 125 mg/m2/day. Key eligibility criteria included measurable disease, a Zubrod PS of 0 or 1, and acceptable organ function. Patients with stable asymptomatic brain metastases were eligible. Dose escalation utilized a standard 3 + 3 design. Results Overall, 16 patients were enrolled to three dose levels, with four patients replaced. Three patients experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was exceeded in Cohort 3. The RP2 dose was carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m² (given on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16) and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 (Days 1, 8 and 15). Common Grade (Gr) 3 and 4 toxicities included fatigue (19%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and diarrhea (13%). Conclusions Irinotecan and carfilzomib were well tolerated, with common toxicities of fatigue, thrombocytopenia and neutropenic fever. Objective clinical response was 19% (one confirmed partial response (PR) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and two unconfirmed); stable disease (SD) was 6% for a disease control rate (DCR) of 25%. The recommended phase II dose was carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m² and irinotecan125 mg/m2. The phase II evaluation is ongoing in relapsed small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: Castration and enzalutamide induce BCL-2 to drive therapy resistance in prostate cancer (PCa). We conducted a phase Ib trial to test that metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) can be effectively targeted by combining enzalutamide with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Experimental design: This phase Ib single-arm trial of enzalutamide (160 mg/d) with venetoclax in patients with progressive mCRPC assessed dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Three dose levels (DL) of venetoclax (DL1 at 400 mg/d; DL2 at 600 mg/d; and DL3 at 800 mg/d) were evaluated using a 3 + 3 design. We also analyzed enzalutamide and venetoclax pharmacokinetics and conducted pharmacodynamic studies in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to determine the impact of venetoclax on BCL-2 expression. Results: A total of 10 patients were enrolled across 3 DL and no DLT was observed. Mean duration on treatment was 29 weeks (range: 8–140 weeks). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mostly grade 1–2, and Grade 3 TRAEs included fatigue (10%) and thrombocytopenia (10%). 1/10 (10%) attained PSA50 response and 4/10 (40%) had stable disease. Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 19 months (95% CI 5–28 months) and median time to next systemic therapy (TNST) was 5 months (95% CI 1–35 months). Pharmacokinetic results revealed sub-optimal plasma levels of venetoclax. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrated that venetoclax enhanced BCL-2β generation and promoted BCL-2 degradation. Conclusions: Enzalutamide with venetoclax has an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with mCRPC. Despite sub-optimal venetoclax levels, the treatment elicited pharmacodynamic and clinical response in a subset of patients. Clinical trial ID: NCT03751436.