Jiaxin Ye

Jiaxin Ye


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 June 2022 in Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YLYiwen Liu
Yiwen Liu
JGJianfang Gao
Jianfang Gao
MXMin Xu
Min Xu
QZQianqian Zhou
Qianqian Zhou
ZZZhongxiao Zhang
Zhongxiao Zhang
瑞李瑞 李
瑞 李
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect, affecting approximately 1% of live births. Genetic and environmental factors are leading factors to CHD, but the mechanism of CHD pathogenesis remains unclear. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are kinds of endogenous non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs) involved in a variety of physiological and pathological processes, especially in heart diseases. In this study, three significant differently expressed circRNA between maternal embryonic day (E) E13 and E17 was found by microarray assay. Among them, the content of circ‐RCCD increases with the development of heart and was enriched in primary cardiomyocytes of different species, which arouses our attention. Functional experiments revealed that inhibition of circ‐RCCD dramatically suppressed the formation of beating cell clusters, the fluorescence intensity of cardiac differentiation marker MF20, and the expression of the myocardial‐specific markers CTnT, Mef2c, and GATA4. Next, we found that circ‐RCCD was involved in cardiomyocyte differentiation through negative regulation of MyD88 expression. Further experiments proved that circ‐RCCD inhibited MyD88 levels by recruiting YY1 to the promoter of MyD88; circ‐RCCD inhibited nuclear translocation of YY1. These results reported that circ‐RCCD promoted cardiomyocyte differentiation by recruiting YY1 to the promoter of MyD88. And, this study provided a potential role and molecular mechanism of circ‐RCCD as a target for the treatment of CHD.

1 January 2025 in Journal of Thoracic Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYan-Rong Yu
Yan-Rong Yu
YWYi-Lin Wang
Yi-Lin Wang
XZXue-Wen Zhu
Xue-Wen Zhu
LLLi Li
Li Li
WDWang Dong-jin
Wang Dong-jin
JYJiaxin Ye
Jiaxin Ye
Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common neurocognitive complication after type A aortic dissection (TAAD), which seriously affects the recovery of patients, and the current intervention timing and treatment methods are still uncertain. This prospective observational cohort study aimed to discuss the effect of dexmedetomidine on POD in patients undergoing TAAD surgery. Methods: Between February 2022 and March 2023, 167 eligible patients aged 18 to 85 years who underwent TAAD surgery participated in this study. The patients were assigned to either the dexmedetomidine or the control group, which did not receive dexmedetomidine treatment. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of delirium within five days following surgery. Secondary outcomes included intubation duration, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), total postoperative hospital stay, incidence of non-delirium complications, and all-cause mortality within seven days. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized. Results: Before PSM, the dexmedetomidine group was made up of 120 patients, whereas the control group comprised 47. The occurrence rate of POD increased from 35.0% in the dexmedetomidine group to 42.6% in the control group, but there was no significant difference [odds ratio (OR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37–1.45; P=0.36]. After 1:1 PSM, there were 42 patients in each of the dexmedetomidine and control groups. The occurrence of POD was 28.6% and 45.2% in the dexmedetomidine and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (OR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.20–1.20; P=0.12). The dexmedetomidine group showed a shorter ICU hospitalization time and postoperative hospital stay than the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the two groups had no statistical differences in other secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine did not decrease the occurrence rate of POD in TAAD patients. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the dexmedetomidine and control groups regarding the occurrence of non-delirium complications, intubation time, ICU hospitalization time, and postoperative hospital stay.