This study evaluated the effect of fluoride varnishes containing micrometric or nanosized sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP) on dentin erosive wear in vitro. Bovine root dentin blocks were selected by surface hardness and randomly divided into five experimental groups/varnishes (n = 20/group): placebo, 5% sodium fluoride (NaF); 5% NaF+5% micrometric TMP; 5% NaF+2.5% nanosized TMP; and 5% NaF+5% nanosized TMP. Half of the surface of all blocks received a single application of the assigned varnish, with subsequent immersion in artificial saliva for 6 h. Varnishes were then removed and the blocks were immersed in citric acid (90 s, 4×/day, 5 days). After each erosive cycle, ten blocks of each group were immersed in a placebo dentifrice for 15 s (ERO), while the other ten blocks were subjected to abrasion by brushing (ERO+ABR). Dentin erosive wear was assessed by profilometry. Data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA and to the Holm-Sidak test (p<0.05). Dentin erosive wear was significantly higher for ERO+ABR than for ERO for all varnishes. TMP-containing varnishes promoted superior effects against dentin erosive wear compared with 5% NaF alone; and 5% nanosized TMP led to the lowest wear among all varnishes. In conclusion, the addition of TMP to conventional fluoride varnish (i.e., varnish containing only NaF) enhanced its protective effects against bovine root dentin erosion and erosion+abrasion. Additionally, the use of 5% nanosized TMP led to superior effects in comparison to 5% micrometric TMP, both for erosion and erosion+abrasion in vitro.

This study aimed to assess the effects of fluoridated varnishes supplemented with micrometric or nanosized sodium trimetaphosphate (TMPmicro or TMPnano, respectively) against enamel softening in an early erosive model in vitro. Bovine enamel blocks (with mean surface hardness [SH] between 330.0 and 380.0 kgf/mm²) were selected and randomly assigned according to their SH (n = 8) into the following groups: Placebo (no fluoride/TMP; negative control), 5% NaF (positive control), 5% NaF + 5%TMPmicro, 5% NaF + 2.5%TMPnano and 5% NaF + 5%TMPnano. Blocks received a single application of the varnishes and were immersed in artificial saliva (6 h). Thereafter, the varnishes were removed and the blocks were subjected to four individual erosive challenges (1 min, citric acid, 0.75%, pH = 3.5, under agitation); SH was determined after each challenge. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls’ test (p < 0.05). Overall, the highest %SH loss was observed for the Placebo, followed by 5% NaF, 5% NaF + 5% TMPmicro, and both varnishes containing TMPnano, without significant differences between 2.5% and 5% TMPnano. It was concluded that TMP enhanced the effects of a 5% NaF varnish against enamel softening in an early erosive model in vitro, with an additional benefit from the use of nanoparticles over microparticles.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP) and fluoride (F) on the surface free energy (SFE) of enamel coated with human salivary pellicle in vitro, both after treatment with the gels and after an erosive challenge. Methods: Bovine enamel discs (n = 10/group) were randomly allocated into seven treatment groups (gels): placebo (without any actives), low-fluoride gels (4500 ppm F—“4500F”) supplemented or not with microparticulate TMP (5%) or nanoparticulate (2.5% or 5%) TMP, 9000 ppm F (positive control), and 12,300 ppm F (acid gel, commercial control); a negative control group (i.e., untreated enamel) was included. Discs were exposed to human saliva (2 h), treated with the gels (1 min) and subjected to a 1-min acid challenge. Three probing liquids were used to assess enamel SFE. Data were submitted to two-way, repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, and by Mann–Whitney’s test (p < 0.05). Results: SFE was significantly altered after exposure to saliva, changing from hydrophobic to slightly hydrophilic; gel treatment further increased enamel hydrophilicity (i.e., electron-donor properties), without significant differences among gels. After the erosive challenge, the enamel surface became significantly less hydrophilic for all groups; the highest values were observed for both gels containing nanoparticulate TMP. As for the overall SFE, the best performance was achieved by the gel containing 5% nanometric TMP. Conclusions: SFE of salivary-coated enamel was significantly influenced by the treatment gels, which promoted increases in hydrophilicity. Gels containing TMP, especially at nanoscale, promoted higher resistance to changes in hydrophilicity after an erosive challenge.

The presence of a foreign body adhered to the hard palate in children is scarcely reported, and health teams may not know this situation. The difficult physical examination, combined with an inaccurate previous history, can impair and delay the diagnosis. The possibility of swallowing or aspiration of the object can be life-threatening, highlighting the importance of prompt diagnosis. This paper aims to report a case of a twenty-month-old patient who had a foreign body adhered to the palate for 21 days with diagnosis of hyperplasia from food burn or neoplasia. After clinical examination, the foreign body was removed in the dental chair with gentle physical restraint of the child's movements by the team with aid of the caretaker. A proper physical examination is essential to facilitate diagnosis and often simple approaches allow for safe removal of the foreign body.