The corrosion behavior of Inconel 718 alloy, developed through two different methods—forging (S1) and additive manufacturing (S2)—was evaluated in a seawater environment, and the results were compared with those of Inconel 825 alloy (S3). The corrosion performance of the alloys was examined according to ISO 8044/2024, using open circuit potential (OCP), potentiodynamic polarization (PP), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), in natural seawater at 25 °C over an extended immersion period. After 5000 h of immersion, the corrosion rate (R_corr) estimated from anodic polarization tests was found to be lower for the wrought Inconel 718 alloy (1.21 µm y⁻¹) compared to the wrought 825 alloy (4.1 µm y⁻¹) and to the SLM Inconel 718 alloy (35.1 µm y⁻¹), indicating high corrosion resistance for wrought Inconel 718. A morphological analysis of the alloy’s surface conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) revealed a continuous, compact film with localized salt deposits on wrought Inconel 718 and Incoloy 825. In contrast, SLM Inconel 718 exhibited a porous, inhomogeneous film, leading to reduced protective capabilities and lower corrosion resistance. The results demonstrate that wrought Inconel 718 exhibits excellent corrosion resistance in seawater, making it a promising alloy for marine applications.

This study investigates how laser power–scan speed combinations influence densification, surface quality, and mechanical performance of Ti-6Al-4V parts fabricated by Powder Bed Fusion–Laser Beam/Metal (PBF-LB/M) on a DMG MORI LASERTEC 30 SLM (2nd generation) system. A parametric matrix was explored by varying laser power (150–400 W) and scan speed (0.9–1.4 m·s⁻¹) at constant layer thickness and hatch spacing, deliberately omitting contour exposure to isolate core scan effects. A stable processing window was identified (250–300 W; 0.9–1.0 m·s⁻¹) corresponding to ~50–60 J·mm⁻³ volumetric energy density (VED) achieved at 99.5% with residual porosity of 0.1–0.3%. In this regime, as-built roughness measured Ra = 4–6 µm on top surfaces and Ra = 15–17 µm on side surfaces. Mechanical testing in the as-built showed ultimate tensile strength (UTS) = 1150–1180 MPa and offset yield strength (YS_0.2) = 955–994 MPa, with elongation up to 6.7%. Hardness increased from 220 HV to 360 HV as densification improved. Notably, similar VED values derived from distinct power–speed combinations resulted in divergent outcomes, confirming that VED alone does not uniquely predict quality. Comparative benchmarks from the literature data highlight the performance achieved. The resulting process–property map provides a practical reference for parameter optimization, reproducibility evaluation, and transferability across platforms.

Polysaccharide-based hydrogels offer versatile platforms for three-dimensional bioprinting, but translation requires coordinated assessment of formulation, processing, and biological performance. This narrative review connects backbone chemistry and functionalization with rheology, crosslinking, printing modality, cellular responses, and manufacturing requirements. It examines alginate, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, cellulose derivatives, gellan gum, and complementary polysaccharides, distinguishing cell-laden bioinks from acellular biomaterial inks and supporting materials. A study-specific framework separates material feasibility, cell-laden printing, functional in vitro outcomes, preclinical evaluation, and preliminary human feasibility without assigning maturity scores to entire material families. Print fidelity and cellular remodeling impose competing requirements whose balance is formulation- and application-dependent. Dual or sequential crosslinking, dynamic networks, and support-bath printing provide complementary approaches rather than a universal solution. Inconsistent reporting limits cross-study comparison; a minimum reporting set is therefore proposed. Sterilization, raw-material variability, quality control, long-term safety, and regulatory classification are considered alongside formulation design. Future priorities include tissue-appropriate viscoelasticity, granular architectures, hierarchical vascularization, and reproducible data-driven optimization. Clinical translation will require stronger links between manufacturing reproducibility and sustained biological function, rather than printing accuracy alone.