Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the most common primary liver cancer and is considered a major global health problem as one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. Due to the increase in life expectancy and the epidemiological growth of specific risk factors, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the incidence of HCC is growing globally, and mortality rates are still high. Moreover, patients frequently present at an intermediate or advanced tumor stage, when curative treatments, such as surgical resection, liver transplantation or ablation are no longer applicable. In these cases, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic therapy are the only suitable options to achieve disease control. The multi-kinase inhibitor Sorafenib has been the only systemic treatment available for unresectable advanced HCC for almost a decade, but in the last couple of years new therapeutic options have emerged. Recent advances in understanding the interactions between the tumor and its microenvironment, especially cancer immune escape, led to the advent of immunotherapy. Currently, first-line systemic treatment for HCC is represented by the combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, but many other ICIs have been investigated, such as Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab and Ipilimumab. However, the problem of second- and third-line therapies, and the correct sequence of treatments remains open and is not addressed in most studies. This explains the urge to find new systemic treatments that can improve the survival and quality of life in patients that can go beyond the first line of treatment. The aim of this paper is to offer a complete overview of the most recent innovations in systemic treatments for unresectable locally advanced and metastatic HCC, including emerging therapies, with a particular focus on treatment sequences. Moreover, we will provide an outlook on possible future approaches to patients who progress beyond first-line therapies.

Fibrosis is an unavoidable consequence of chronic inflammation. Extracellular matrix deposition by fibroblasts, stimulated by multiple pathways, is the first step in the onset of chronic liver disease, and its propagation promotes liver dysfunction. At the same time, chronic liver disease is characterized by alterations in primary and secondary hemostasis but unlike previously thought, these changes are not associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. In recent years, the role of coagulation imbalance has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms promoting hepatic fibrogenesis. In this review, we aim to investigate the function of microvascular thrombosis in the progression of liver disease and highlight the molecular and cellular networks linking hemostasis to fibrosis in this context. We analyze the predictive and prognostic role of coagulation products as biomarkers of liver decompensation (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy) and liver-related mortality. Finally, we evaluate the current evidence on the application of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies for prophylaxis of hepatic decompensation or prevention of the progression of liver fibrosis.

Hepatobiliary malignancies, which include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), are the sixth most common cancers and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Hepatic carcinogenesis is highly stimulated by chronic inflammation, defined as fibrosis deposition, and an aberrant imbalance between liver necrosis and nodular regeneration. In this context, the gut–liver axis and gut microbiota have demonstrated a critical role in the pathogenesis of HCC, as dysbiosis and altered intestinal permeability promote bacterial translocation, leading to chronic liver inflammation and tumorigenesis through several pathways. A few data exist on the role of the gut microbiota or bacteria resident in the biliary tract in the pathogenesis of CCA, and some microbial metabolites, such as choline and bile acids, seem to show an association. In this review, we analyze the impact of the gut microbiota and its metabolites on HCC and CCA development and the role of gut dysbiosis as a biomarker of hepatobiliary cancer risk and of response during anti-tumor therapy. We also discuss the future application of gut microbiota in hepatobiliary cancer management.

Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are highly heterogeneous malignancies. They are characterized by a peculiar tumor microenvironment and dense vascularization. The importance of signaling between immune cells, endothelial cells, and tumor cells leads to the difficult recapitulation of a reliable in vitro HCC model using the conventional two-dimensional cell cultures. The advent of three-dimensional organoid tumor technology has revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis and progression of several malignancies by faithfully replicating the original cancer genomic, epigenomic, and microenvironmental landscape. Organoids more closely mimic the in vivo environment and cell interactions, replicating factors such as the spatial organization of cell surface receptors and gene expression, and will probably become an important tool in the choice of therapies and the evaluation of tumor response to treatments. This review aimed to describe the ongoing and potential applications of organoids as an in vitro model for the study of HCC development, its interaction with the host’s immunity, the analysis of drug sensitivity tests, and the current limits in this field.

The management of CSPH in patients undergoing systemic treatment for HCC has emerged as a critical concern due to the absence of reliable diagnostic criteria and uncertainties surrounding therapeutic approaches. This review aims to underscore the primary pathophysiological aspects linking HCC and PH, while also addressing the current and emerging clinical strategies for the management of portal hypertension. A review of studies from January 2003 to June 2023 was conducted using the PubMed database and employing MeSH terms, such as “hepatocellular carcinoma”, “immune checkpoint inhibitors”, “systemic therapy”, “portal hypertension”, “variceal bleeding” and “tyrosine kinase inhibitors”. Despite promising results of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in animal models for PH and fibrosis, only Sorafenib has demonstrated similar effects in human studies, whereas Lenvatinib appears to promote PH development. The impact of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab on PH remains uncertain, with an increasing risk of bleeding related to Bevacizumab in patients with prior variceal hemorrhage. Given the absence of specific guidelines, endoscopic surveillance during treatment is advisable, and primary and secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding should adhere to the Baveno VII recommendations. Furthermore, in patients with advanced HCC, refinement of diagnostic criteria for CSPH and guidelines for its surveillance are warranted.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by a complex disruption of hemostatic balance, increasing the risk of both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Thrombotic complications, most notably portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE), have a significant impact on clinical outcomes and therapeutic strategies. Cirrhosis contributes to the precarious equilibrium between pro- and anticoagulant forces through impaired synthesis of coagulation factors, endothelial dysfunction, and systemic inflammation. In the presence of HCC tumor-driven mechanisms, such as tissue factor expression, extracellular vesicle release, platelet activation, and suppression of fibrinolysis exacerbate this prothrombotic state. In this scenario, advanced diagnostic tools such as thrombin generation assay (TGA) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) offer a more accurate assessment of coagulation dynamics than conventional tests, enabling better risk stratification especially for therapeutic purposes. Anticoagulant therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit in selected cases of non-malignant PVT and VTE, particularly when liver function is preserved. While prophylactic strategies are still under investigation, data suggest they may be safely implemented in selected surgical patients. In the setting of immunotherapy, especially regimens involving anti-VEGF agents, anticoagulation may be considered with careful management of bleeding risk due to portal hypertension. An individualized approach to anticoagulation, supported by functional coagulation testing, is gaining acceptance as a means to safely reduce thrombotic burden and potentially improve outcomes in patients with HCC.