Hepatobiliary malignancies, which include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), are the sixth most common cancers and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Hepatic carcinogenesis is highly stimulated by chronic inflammation, defined as fibrosis deposition, and an aberrant imbalance between liver necrosis and nodular regeneration. In this context, the gut–liver axis and gut microbiota have demonstrated a critical role in the pathogenesis of HCC, as dysbiosis and altered intestinal permeability promote bacterial translocation, leading to chronic liver inflammation and tumorigenesis through several pathways. A few data exist on the role of the gut microbiota or bacteria resident in the biliary tract in the pathogenesis of CCA, and some microbial metabolites, such as choline and bile acids, seem to show an association. In this review, we analyze the impact of the gut microbiota and its metabolites on HCC and CCA development and the role of gut dysbiosis as a biomarker of hepatobiliary cancer risk and of response during anti-tumor therapy. We also discuss the future application of gut microbiota in hepatobiliary cancer management.

Background/Objectives: Liver fibrosis is a progressive consequence of chronic liver injury that can evolve into cirrhosis, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma, representing a major global health burden. Fibrogenesis is driven by hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, excessive extracellular matrix deposition, and structural disruption of liver tissue, with transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling and inflammatory mediators as central pathways. Current therapies primarily target the underlying causes, which may halt disease progression but rarely reverse established fibrosis. This review aims to outline current and emerging therapeutic strategies for liver fibrosis, informing both clinical practice and future research directions. Methods: A narrative synthesis of preclinical and clinical evidence was conducted, focusing on pharmacological interventions, microbiota-directed strategies, and innovative modalities under investigation for antifibrotic activity. Results: Bile acids, including ursodeoxycholic acid and derivatives, modulate HSC activity and autophagy. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, such as obeticholic acid, reduce fibrosis but are limited by adverse effects. Fatty acid synthase inhibitors, exemplified by denifanstat, show promise in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Additional strategies include renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, omega-3 fatty acids, and agents targeting the gut–liver axis. Microbiota-directed interventions—probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, antibiotics (e.g., rifaximin), and fecal microbiota transplantation—are emerging as potential modulators of barrier integrity, inflammation, and fibrogenesis, though larger clinical trials are required. Reliable non-invasive biomarkers and innovative trial designs, including adaptive platforms, are essential to improve patient selection and efficiently evaluate multiple agents and combinations. Conclusions: Novel modalities such as immunotherapy, gene editing, and multi-targeted therapies hold additional potential for fibrosis reversal. Continued translational efforts are critical to establish safe, effective, and accessible treatments for patients with liver fibrosis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent among primary liver tumors (90%) and one of the main causes of cancer-related death. It develops usually in a chronically inflamed environment, ranging from compensatory parenchymal regeneration to fibrosis and cirrhosis: carcinogenesis can potentially happen in each of these stages. Inflammation determined by chronic viral infection (hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and hepatitis delta viruses) represents an important risk factor for HCC etiology through both viral direct damage and immune-related mechanisms. The deregulation of the physiological liver immunological network determined by viral infection can lead to carcinogenesis. The recent introduction of immunotherapy as the gold-standard first-line treatment for HCC highlights the role of the immune system and inflammation as a double-edged weapon in both HCC carcinogenesis and treatment. In this review we highlight how the inflammation is the key for the hepatocarcinogenesis in viral, alcohol and metabolic liver diseases.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) represents the second most common liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma, accounting for 15% of primary liver neoplasms. Its incidence and mortality rate have been rising during the last years, and total new cases are expected to increase up to 10-fold during the next two or three decades. Considering iCCA’s poor prognosis and rapid spread, early diagnosis is still a crucial issue and can be very challenging due to the heterogeneity of tumor presentation at imaging exams and the need to assess a correct differential diagnosis with other liver lesions. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an irreplaceable role in the evaluation of liver masses. iCCA’s most typical imaging patterns are well-described, but atypical features are not uncommon at both CT and MRI; on the other hand, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has shown a great diagnostic value, with the interesting advantage of lower costs and no renal toxicity, but there is still no agreement regarding the most accurate contrastographic patterns for iCCA detection. Besides diagnostic accuracy, all these imaging techniques play a pivotal role in the choice of the therapeutic approach and eligibility for surgery, and there is an increasing interest in the specific imaging features which can predict tumor behavior or histologic subtypes. Further prognostic information may also be provided by the extraction of quantitative data through radiomic analysis, creating prognostic multi-parametric models, including clinical and serological parameters. In this review, we aim to summarize the role of contrast-enhanced imaging in the diagnosis and management of iCCA, from the actual issues in the differential diagnosis of liver masses to the newest prognostic implications.

Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are highly heterogeneous malignancies. They are characterized by a peculiar tumor microenvironment and dense vascularization. The importance of signaling between immune cells, endothelial cells, and tumor cells leads to the difficult recapitulation of a reliable in vitro HCC model using the conventional two-dimensional cell cultures. The advent of three-dimensional organoid tumor technology has revolutionized our understanding of the pathogenesis and progression of several malignancies by faithfully replicating the original cancer genomic, epigenomic, and microenvironmental landscape. Organoids more closely mimic the in vivo environment and cell interactions, replicating factors such as the spatial organization of cell surface receptors and gene expression, and will probably become an important tool in the choice of therapies and the evaluation of tumor response to treatments. This review aimed to describe the ongoing and potential applications of organoids as an in vitro model for the study of HCC development, its interaction with the host’s immunity, the analysis of drug sensitivity tests, and the current limits in this field.

A correct differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intracellular cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is essential for clinical management and prognostic prediction. However, non-invasive differential diagnosis between HCC and ICC remains highly challenging. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) with standardized software is a valuable tool in the diagnostic approach to focal liver lesions and could improve accuracy in the evaluation of tumor perfusion. Moreover, the measurement of tissue stiffness could add more information concerning tumoral environment. To explore the diagnostic performance of multiparametric ultrasound (MP-US) in differentiating ICC from HCC. Our secondary aim was to develop an US score for distinguishing ICC and HCC. Between January 2021 and September 2022 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC and ICC were enrolled in this prospective monocentric study. A complete US evaluation including B mode, D-CEUS and shear wave elastography (SWE) was performed in all patients and the corresponding features were compared between the tumor entities. For better inter-individual comparability, the blood volume-related D-CEUS parameters were analyzed as a ratio between lesions and surrounding liver parenchyma. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to select the most useful independent variables for the differential diagnosis between HCC and ICC and to establish an US score for non-invasive diagnosis. Finally, the diagnostic performance of the score was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A total of 82 patients (mean age ± SD, 68 ± 11 years, 55 men) were enrolled, including 44 ICC and 38 HCC. No statistically significant differences in basal US features were found between HCC and ICC. Concerning D-CEUS, blood volume parameters (peak intensity, PE; area under the curve, AUC; and wash-in rate, WiR) showed significantly higher values in the HCC group, but PE was the only independent feature associated with HCC diagnosis at multivariate analysis (p = 0.02). The other two independent predictors of histological diagnosis were liver cirrhosis (p < 0.01) and SWE (p = 0.01). A score based on those variables was highly accurate for the differential diagnosis of primary liver tumors, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.836 and the optimal cut-off values of 0.81 and 0.20 to rule in or rule out ICC respectively. MP-US seems to be a useful tool for non-invasive discrimination between ICC and HCC and could prevent the need for liver biopsy at least in a subgroup of patients.