Prassan Shah

Dr. Prassan Shah


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2020 in Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Navneet KhannaNavneet Khanna
Navneet Khanna
PSPrassan Shah
Prassan Shah
RMRadosław W. Maruda
Radosław W. Maruda
Grzegorz KrolczykGrzegorz Krolczyk
Grzegorz Krolczyk
Hussien HegabHussien Hegab
Hussien Hegab

17 August 2022 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Navneet KhannaNavneet Khanna
Navneet Khanna
ARAdrian Rodriguez
Adrian Rodriguez
PSPrassan Shah
Prassan Shah
Octavio PereiraOctavio Pereira
Octavio Pereira
ARAntonio Rubio-Mateos
Antonio Rubio-Mateos
TOTxomin Ostra
Txomin Ostra
In the present scenario, citizens’ concern about environment preservation creates a necessity to mature more ecological and energy-efficient manufacturing processes and materials. The usage of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) is one of the emerging materials to replace the traditional metallic alloys in the automotive and aircraft industries. However, it has been comprehended to arise a sustainable substitute to conventional emulsion-based coolants in machining processes for dropping the destructive effects on the ecosystem without degrading the machining performance. So, in this study, the comparison of the two sustainable cutting fluid approaches, i.e., dry and LCO2, has been presented based on machining performance indicators like temperature, modulus of cutting force, tool wear, surface roughness, power consumption, and life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis for end milling of GFRP. The cutting condition of LCO2 has been found to be superior in terms of machining performance by providing 80% of lower cutting zone temperature, tool wear, 5% lower modulus of cutting force, and reduced surface roughness with 9% lower power consumption that has been observed in the case of LCO2 in comparison with dry machining. However, to compress the CO2 for converting in liquid form, a higher amount of energy and natural resources is consumed resulting in a higher impact on the environment in comparison with dry machining. Considering the 18 impact categories of ReCiPe midpoint (H) 2016, 95% higher values of impacts have been observed in the case of LCO2 in comparison with dry machining.

19 July 2020 in Silicon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Navneet KhannaNavneet Khanna
Navneet Khanna
PSPrassan Shah
Prassan Shah
NSNarendra Mohan Suri
Narendra Mohan Suri
CAChetan Agrawal
Chetan Agrawal
SKSandeep K. Khatkar
Sandeep K. Khatkar
Murat SarikayaMurat Sarikaya
Murat Sarikaya

8 March 2021 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TPTej Patel
Tej Patel
Navneet KhannaNavneet Khanna
Navneet Khanna
SYSahitya Yadav
Sahitya Yadav
PSPrassan Shah
Prassan Shah
Murat SarikayaMurat Sarikaya
Murat Sarikaya
NKNitin Kotkunde
Nitin Kotkunde

30 April 2019 in Journal of Welding and Joining
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPrassan Shah
Prassan Shah
CAChetan Agrawal
Chetan Agrawal

1 January 2020 in Materials Today: Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPTej Patel
Tej Patel
SYSahitya Yadav
Sahitya Yadav
ZRZeel Raj
Zeel Raj
PSPrassan Shah
Prassan Shah
NKNavneet Khanna
Navneet Khanna