Ultrasound guided parasternal block is a regional anaesthesia technique targeting the anterior branches of intercostal nerves, which supply the anterior thoracic wall. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the efficacy of parasternal block to manage postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery throughout sternotomy. A total of 126 consecutive patients were allocated to two different groups, receiving (Parasternal group) or not (Control group) preoperative ultrasound guided bilateral parasternal block with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine per side. The following data were recorded: postoperative pain expressed by a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS), intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative morphine consumption, time to extubation and perioperative pulmonary performance at incentive spirometry. Postoperative NRS was not significantly different between Parasternal and Control groups with a median (IQR) of 2 (0–4.5) vs. 3 (0–6) upon awakening (p = 0.07); 0 (0–3) vs. 2 (0–4) at 6 h (p = 0.46); 0 (0–2) vs. 0 (0–2) at 12 h (p = 0.57). Postoperative morphine consumption was similar among groups. However, intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the Parasternal group [406.3 ± 81.6 mcg vs. 864.3 ± 154.4, (p < 0.001)]. Parasternal group showed shorter times to extubation [(191 ± 58 min vs. 305 ± 72 min, (p)] and better performance at incentive spirometer with a median (IQR) of 2 raised balls (1–2) vs. 1 (1–2) after awakening (p = 0.04). Ultrasound guided parasternal block provided an optimal perioperative analgesia with a significant reduction in intraoperative opioid consumption, time to extubation and a better postoperative performance at spirometry when compared to the Control group.

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction frequently occurs after cardiac surgery and is linked to adverse postoperative outcomes, including mortality, reintubation, stroke, and prolonged ICU stays. While various criteria using echocardiography and hemodynamic parameters have been proposed, a consensus remains elusive. Distinctive RV anatomical features include its thin wall, which presents a triangular shape in a lateral view and a crescent shape in a cross-sectional view. Principal causes of RV dysfunction after cardiac surgery encompass ischemic reperfusion injury, prolonged ischemic time, choice of cardioplegia and its administration, cardiopulmonary bypass weaning characteristics, and preoperative risk factors. Post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation RV dysfunction is common but often transient, with a favorable prognosis upon resolution. There is an ongoing debate regarding the benefits of concomitant surgical repair of the RV in the presence of regurgitation. According to the literature, the gold standard techniques for assessing RV function are cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and hemodynamic assessment using thermodilution. Echocardiography is widely favored for perioperative RV function evaluation due to its accessibility, reproducibility, non-invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Although other techniques exist for RV function assessment, they are less common in clinical practice. Clinical management strategies focus on early detection and include intravenous drugs (inotropes and vasodilators), inhalation drugs (pulmonary vasodilators), ventilator strategies, volume management, and mechanical support. Bridging research gaps in this field is crucial to improving clinical outcomes associated with RV dysfunction in the near future.

Background: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, although effective for pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA), does not cover skin analgesia. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the effectiveness of PENG block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block or wound infiltration (WI) on postoperative analgesia and functional outcomes. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing posterior-approached THA under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive LFCN block with 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine or WI with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. In both groups, PENG block was performed by injecting 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes were static and dynamic pain scores (0–10 numeric rating scale) measured in the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, functional assessment and length of hospital stay. Results: Postoperative static NRS of patients receiving LFCN was higher than that of patients receiving WI at 6 h but lower at 24 h, with a median (IQR) of 3 (2–4) vs. 2 (1–2) (p < 0.001) and 2 (2–3) vs. 3 (3–4) (p = 0.02), respectively. Static pain scores at 12 h did not show significant differences, with an NRS of 3 (2–4) for WI vs. 3 (3–4) for LFCN (p = 0.94). Dynamic pain and range of movement followed a similar trend. No significant differences were detected in other outcomes. Conclusions: LFCN block was not inferior to WI for postoperative analgesia and functional recovery in association with PENG block during the first postoperative day, although it had worse short-term pain scores. Based on these results, it is reasonable to consider LFCN block as a valid alternative to WI or even a complementary technique added to WI to enhance skin analgesia during the first 24 h after THA. Future studies are expected to confirm this hypothesis and find the best combination between PENG block and other techniques to enhance analgesia after THA.

Shoulder surgery has radically evolved within the last 70 years, from a marginal orthopedic sub-specialty to an area of great research and advancement; consequently, anesthetic techniques have undergone important development. In fact, a wide variety of anesthetic strategies have emerged, to provide anesthesia and post-operative analgesia: general anesthesia (GA), regional anesthesia (RA), or combined GA and RA. A literature review on online databases was carried out about the different anesthetic approaches for shoulder surgery and their evolution through the years, taking in consideration papers from 1929 to 2021. A comprehensive preoperative assessment of patients undergoing shoulder surgery allows to identify and modify potential risk factors and complications of general anesthesia. Moreover, the use of ultrasound-guided regional blocks could improve the effectiveness of these techniques and bring better postoperative outcomes. Anesthetic management for shoulder surgery has progressed drastically during the last century. More studies are needed to finally standardize anesthetic techniques for specific procedure.

Foot and ankle surgery is often associated with significant postoperative pain that may delay mobilization and recovery. For this reason, effective perioperative analgesia is essential to improve outcomes, minimize opioid use, and enable safe early discharge when appropriate. This review provides an updated overview of regional anesthesia techniques for foot and ankle surgery, highlighting anatomical considerations, ultrasound guidance, and patient-tailored block selection. Different techniques will be specifically addressed over neuraxial and nerve blocks, such as the Mayo block and intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block), as well as the emerging WALANT approach for selected cases. Ultrasound guidance has become a gold-standard, enhancing precision and safety compared to landmark-based methods. Multimodal analgesia combining regional blocks with non-opioid medications and adjuvants like intravenous dexamethasone further optimizes pain control while limiting opioid requirements. In ambulatory settings, motor-sparing techniques and short-acting spinal agents are emphasized to support rapid recovery and same-day discharge. By integrating anatomical knowledge with ultrasound and multimodal strategies, perioperative pain management for foot and ankle surgery can be tailored to balance effective analgesia with early mobilization and patient safety.

The increasing interest in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is due to the deep link between mortality and the severity of TR, as well as the limited application of surgical solutions in a setting marked by high in-hospital mortality, attributed to the late presentation of the disease. This delay in intervention is likely associated with a limited understanding of valvular and ventricular anatomy as well as the pathophysiology of the disease, leading to an underestimation of TR severity. With the rapid development of transcatheter solutions showing early safety and efficacy, there is a growing necessity to accurately understand and diagnose the valvular disease process to determine suitable management strategies. This review will outline the normal and pathological anatomy of the tricuspid valve, classify the anatomical substrates of TR, and present new risk stratification methods to determine the appropriate timing for both medical and surgical treatment.