Murat Kendirci

Dr. Murat Kendirci


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 July 2013 in World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYSelim Yigit Yildiz
Selim Yigit Yildiz
MKMurat Kendirci
Murat Kendirci
SASerkan Akbulut
Serkan Akbulut
ACAli Ciftci
Ali Ciftci
HTHamdi Taner Turgut
Hamdi Taner Turgut
SHSuleyman Hengirmen
Suleyman Hengirmen
Foreign bodies in rectum and colon is an uncommon problem in surgical practice. Anal eroticism leads amongst etiologic factors. In some patients accidents or forceful application of foreign bodies are causative factors. This study was designed to describe our experience in diagnosis and treatment of this exciting clinical problem.

1 January 2014 in World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYSelim Y Yildiz
Selim Y Yildiz
HBHuseyin Berkem
Huseyin Berkem
BYBulent C Yuksel
Bulent C Yuksel
HOHakan Ozel
Hakan Ozel
MKMurat Kendirci
Murat Kendirci
SHSuleyman Hengirmen
Suleyman Hengirmen
During the past 25 years, the incidence of thyroid papillary carcinoma (TPC), especially the micropapillary subtype, has been increasing in different countries worldwide. The rise in the rate of thyroid malignancies were also determined in Turkey in the last two decades. This fact was attributed to the Chernobyl accident because Turkey is one of the affected countries by the radioactive fallout. The aim of this study was to assess the changes in the parameters of the thyroid and put forth the reasons in a 14-year period.

8 September 2017 in Medical Science Monitor
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
İŞİbrahim Tayfun Şahiner
İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner
MKMurat Kendirci
Murat Kendirci
BACKGROUND:T-tube placement in the common bile duct (CBD) is a surgical alternative to bile duct reconstruction in cholecystectomy for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, or gallstones. The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to investigate the ...

1 May 2022 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DDDogukan Durak
Dogukan Durak
EAErtuğrul Gazi Alkurt
Ertuğrul Gazi Alkurt
VTVeysel Barış Turhan
Veysel Barış Turhan
MTMehmet Berksun Tutan
Mehmet Berksun Tutan
İŞİbrahim Tayfun Şahiner
İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner
MKMurat Kendirci
Murat Kendirci
Objective: Although laparoscopic colon cancer surgeries have increased in recent years, their oncological competence is questioned. In our study, we aimed to evaluate oncological competence by comparing laparoscopic and open surgery. Method: The study was planned retrospectively. A total of 94 patients were included in the study, 42 of whom underwent laparoscopy, and 52 patients underwent open surgery. Both groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, staging, number of benign/malignant lymph nodes, histological findings, and complications. Result: The final pathology report of all patients was adenocarcinoma. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 20.9 in the open group (8-34) and 19.46 in the laparoscopy group (7-31) (p = 0.639). The median number of dissected malignant lymph nodes was 1 (0-13) in the open surgery group and 3.1 (0-8) in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.216). The laparoscopy group exhibited a longer operation time (281.2 ± 54.2 and 221.0 ± 51.5 min, respectively; p = 0.036) than the open surgery group, but a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, quicker initiation oral feeding, and shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 ± 0.9 vs 5.7 ± 2.0 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Discussion: Laparoscopic surgery elicits many benefits such as less wound infection, lower requirement for blood transfusion, shorter hospitalization, quicker initiation of oral feeding, and mobilization. Our study has shown that laparoscopic surgery provides quite adequate lymph node dissection when compared to oncological surgery, which is viewed with suspicion in the light of these benefits of laparoscopy.

18 March 2020 in Turkish Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AYAhmet Çınar Yastı
Ahmet Çınar Yastı
AUAhmet Deniz Uçar
Ahmet Deniz Uçar
MKMurat Kendirci
Murat Kendirci
Objective: As one of the oldest and main branches of medicine, process of General Surgery speciality training is long, expensive and difficult. Along with the principle of using limited sources wisely, there is a need for national forward planning in order to keep the number of General Surgery specialists in the proper level and in the proper quality. This study is made for the assurement of training quality specialists and for the sustainability in the best conditions after determining of the number of general surgeons, work force, and working conditions. Material and Methods: The number of General Surgery specialists (professors, associate professors, specialists or General Surgery subspecialists) and assistants who actively work in our country from the end of 2017 in the public sector, private sector, and university hospitals, is examined. These numbers were subjected to cross evaluation according to the provinces, academic titles and number of assistants. The estimated ratio of the existing number of General Surgery specialists to upcoming five and ten years were calculated according to the data of Turkish Statistical Institute. Results: From the end of 2017, 3957 General Surgery specialists are actively working in 1031 of 1499 health facilities. Four hundred and forty of them are titled as professors, 324 of them are titled as associate professors. For every 25 thousand people, there exist 1.22 surgeons. Ten years ago, this ratio was calculated as 1.27.The number of assistans, which was 1005 ten years ago, is decreased to 768 today, but the increase of the number of specialists is 409. Conclusion:The number of General Surgeons in our country is above the ideal ratio, which is one for 25 thousand people. In case rate of increase of the number of General Surgeons for the last 10 years continues, when the decrease of population growth rate is considered, there will be an uncontrolled increase in the number of surgeon per 25 thousand people. Just as the distribution of General Surgery specialists -whether or not having an academic title- is not balanced, the number of instructor per assistant is also excessive.

27 March 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VTVeysel Barış Turhan
Veysel Barış Turhan
OKOnur Karacif
Onur Karacif
MTMehmet Berksun Tutan
Mehmet Berksun Tutan
BKBahadır Kartal
Bahadır Kartal
FŞFatih Şahin
Fatih Şahin
EAErtuğrul Gazi Alkurt
Ertuğrul Gazi Alkurt
Background and Objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication of colorectal surgery (CRS), increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. While several AL risk factors have been identified, the role of aortic calcification (AC) remains unclear. As a marker of systemic atherosclerosis, AC may impair tissue perfusion and anastomotic healing. Additionally, tumor factors (TNM stage, histology, and localization) and patient comorbidities (hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and neoadjuvant therapy) may contribute to AL risk. This study evaluates the association between preoperative AC and AL incidence while considering additional risk factors. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 151 patients undergoing CRS from January 2020 to October 2023. Preoperative CT scans classified AC into Stage 0 (none), Stage 1 (50%) of the aortic circumference. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, and comorbidities were collected. AL risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: AL occurred in 5.96% (9/151) of patients. AL incidence was significantly higher in patients with >50% AC (44.47% vs. 11.27%, p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis confirmed AC as an independent AL predictor (OR = 10.38, 95% CI: 1.243–92.118, p = 0.032). Rectal tumor localization (p = 0.038), hypertension (p = 0.027), cardiovascular disease (p = 0.014), and neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.045) were also associated with increased AL risk. Conclusions: Severe AC is an independent predictor of AL in CRS. Additionally, rectal tumors, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and neoadjuvant therapy contribute to AL risk. Preoperative vascular assessments and comprehensive risk stratification models may help identify high-risk patients and guide perioperative management strategies to reduce AL incidence.