Francisco J. Rey Martínez

Dr. Francisco J. Rey Martínez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAna Tejero-González
Ana Tejero-González
MAManuel Andrés-Chicote
Manuel Andrés-Chicote
PGPaola García-Ibáñez
Paola García-Ibáñez
EGEloy Velasco Gomez
Eloy Velasco Gomez
FMFrancisco J. Rey Martínez
Francisco J. Rey Martínez

1 September 2018 in Energy and Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Javier M. Rey HernándezJavier M. Rey Hernández
Javier M. Rey Hernández
Charles YousifCharles Yousif
Charles Yousif
DGDamien Gatt
Damien Gatt
EGEloy Velasco Gomez
Eloy Velasco Gomez
JJJulio San José
Julio San José
FMFrancisco J. Rey Martínez
Francisco J. Rey Martínez

1 November 2012 in Energy and Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAManuel Andrés-Chicote
Manuel Andrés-Chicote
ATAna Tejero-González
Ana Tejero-González
EGEloy Velasco Gomez
Eloy Velasco Gomez
FMFrancisco J. Rey Martínez
Francisco J. Rey Martínez

1 September 2012 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EGEloy Velasco Gomez
Eloy Velasco Gomez
ATAna Tejero-González
Ana Tejero-González
FMFrancisco J. Rey Martínez
Francisco J. Rey Martínez

26 October 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMilen Balbis-Morejon
Milen Balbis-Morejon
Javier M. Rey HernándezJavier M. Rey Hernández
Javier M. Rey Hernández
Carlos AmarisCarlos Amaris
Carlos Amaris
EGEloy Velasco Gomez
Eloy Velasco Gomez
JJJulio San José
Julio San José
FMFrancisco J. Rey Martínez
Francisco J. Rey Martínez
This study presents the evaluation of the performance and acceptability of thermal comfort by students in the classrooms of a university building with minisplit-type air-conditioning systems, in a tropical climate. To carry out the study, temperature and humidity measurements were recorded, both outside and inside the selected classrooms, while the students were asked to complete thermal surveys on site. The survey model is based on the template proposed by Fanger and it was applied to a total number of 584 students. In each classroom, the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and the Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) were estimated according to Fanger’s methodology, as well as the Thermal Sensation Vote (TSV) and the Actual Percentage Dissatisfied (APD), which were obtained from the measurements and the surveys. The results of this study showed that the PMV values, although they may vary with the insulation of the clothing, do not affect the TSV. Furthermore, comparing PMV vs. TSV scores, a 2 °C to 3 °C difference in operating temperature was found, whereby the thermal sensitivity for TSV was colder, so it could be assumed that the PMV model overestimates the thermal sensitivity of students in low-temperature conditions. In addition, an acceptability by 90% with thermal preferences between 23 °C and 24 °C were also found. These results indicate that it is possible to increase the temperature set point in minisplit-type air-conditioning system from 4 °C to 7 °C with respect to the currently set temperatures, without affecting the acceptability of the thermal environment to the students in the building.

1 August 2005 in International Journal of Refrigeration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EGEloy Velasco Gomez
Eloy Velasco Gomez
FMFrancisco J. Rey Martínez
Francisco J. Rey Martínez
FVFernando Varela
Fernando Varela
MLM.J. Molina Leyva
M.J. Molina Leyva
RMR. Herrero Martín
R. Herrero Martín