Background: Left colon cancer obstruction treatment is a debated topic in the literature. Stent placement is effective as a bridge-to-surgery strategy, but there are some concerns about the oncological safety for the reported higher risk of local and peritoneal recurrence. This study aims to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients treated with stent followed by elective surgery with those treated with primary resection. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. We included patients of both sexes, ≥18 years old, with a histological diagnosis of intestinal adenocarcinoma, and admitted to our hospital for left colon cancer obstruction demonstrated by CT scan without metastasis or perforation. They were treated through primary resection (PR) or stent placement followed by elective surgery (SR). The two groups were compared for general characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes (metastasis and local recurrence) at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, and 3 years. Post-operative quality of life (QoL) was also investigated. Results: The SR group showed a shorter hospital stay, a lower post-operative mortality, a lower stoma rate at 1 year, and a higher number of minimally invasive procedures. Oncological outcomes were not different compared to the PR group. The SR group demonstrated better QoL in two out of six items on the EQ-5D-5L test. Conclusions: Stent placement as a bridge-to-surgery strategy is feasible and provides better surgical outcomes in terms of post-operative complications, surgical approach, stoma rate, and QoL. Oncological outcomes were not reported differently, but further studies should be conducted to better evaluate this aspect.

Background: The catecholamine-induced hypertensive crisis is a rare, life-threatening condition caused by excessive catecholamine release, often resulting in cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure. Management is challenging, especially when hemodynamic instability persists despite standard medical therapy. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of published articles between 2013 and 2025. The search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed, Scholar and Embase). We also presented a case managed at our reference center. Results: Overall, 42 studies including 69 patients were included. ECMO was the most commonly used modality, often serving as a bridge to surgery. The overall hospital mortality rate was 17.4%. Timing of adrenalectomy varied, with no clear consensus on the optimal approach. We report also a case of a 43-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1 who developed acute cardiogenic shock due to an adrenal paraganglioma. She was supported with ECMO and underwent emergency bowel resection for intestinal ischemia, followed by adrenalectomy. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient died from progressive multiorgan failure. Conclusions: This case highlights the complexity of managing paraganglioma crisis, the potential role of ECMO as a bridge to surgery, and the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary care. Early recognition and referral to specialized centers are essential, though further studies are needed to guide optimal management strategies.