Severe or major burns induce a pathophysiological, immune, and inflammatory response that can persist for a long time and affect morbidity and mortality. Severe burns are followed by a “hypermetabolic response”, an inflammatory process that can be extensive and become uncontrolled, leading to a generalized catabolic state and delayed healing. Catabolism causes the upregulation of inflammatory cells and innate immune markers in various organs, which may lead to multiorgan failure and death. Burns activate immune cells and cytokine production regulated by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Trauma has similar injury-related immune responses, whereby DAMPs are massively released in musculoskeletal injuries and elicit widespread systemic inflammation. Hemorrhagic shock is the main cause of death in trauma. It is hypovolemic, and the consequence of volume loss and the speed of blood loss manifest immediately after injury. In burns, the shock becomes evident within the first 24 h and is hypovolemic-distributive due to the severely compromised regulation of tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery caused by capillary leakage, whereby fluids shift from the intravascular to the interstitial space. In this review, we compare the pathophysiological responses to burns and trauma including their associated clinical patterns.

Background: The management of high-surgical-risk patients with moderate to severe acute cholecystitis is challenging in clinical practice. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. However, for those unfit for surgery due to high risk, alternative treatment options, such as percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), are available. There are no clear guidelines regarding the management of patients following PC. The primary aim of this study was to propose indications for PC in high-surgical-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and to establish management strategies for gallbladder drainage, either as a bridge to surgery or as a definitive treatment, according to available literature. Materials and methods: After a targeted literature review, International and Italian experts in the field from the Italian Society of Research in Surgery (SIRC) and the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma (SICUT) were consulted to provide their evidence-based opinions on the topic. Statements were proposed during subsequent rounds using the Delphi methodology. Ten statements were provided, and the final agreement is presented in this study. Results: Patients with moderate acute cholecystitis, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 6, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Performance Status (ASA-PS) ≥ 3 who fail conservative treatment should undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the first-line approach. For those with severe acute cholecystitis at high-surgical risk, percutaneous cholecystostomy is recommended to relieve symptoms within 24–48 hours. Once the infection is controlled, we should assess which patients may be candidates for interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For patients selected for surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended at least six weeks after PC placement. In patients not suitable for surgery, such as those with CCI ≥ 6 and ASA-PS ≥ 4, percutaneous cholecystostomy should remain in place for at least three weeks, after which, following radiographic confirmation of biliary tree patency, the tube may be removed. Conclusions: This consensus, developed through a multidisciplinary collaboration of interventional radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons, provides a clear and practical guide for managing high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis.

Background: Left colon cancer obstruction treatment is a debated topic in the literature. Stent placement is effective as a bridge-to-surgery strategy, but there are some concerns about the oncological safety for the reported higher risk of local and peritoneal recurrence. This study aims to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients treated with stent followed by elective surgery with those treated with primary resection. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. We included patients of both sexes, ≥18 years old, with a histological diagnosis of intestinal adenocarcinoma, and admitted to our hospital for left colon cancer obstruction demonstrated by CT scan without metastasis or perforation. They were treated through primary resection (PR) or stent placement followed by elective surgery (SR). The two groups were compared for general characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes (metastasis and local recurrence) at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, and 3 years. Post-operative quality of life (QoL) was also investigated. Results: The SR group showed a shorter hospital stay, a lower post-operative mortality, a lower stoma rate at 1 year, and a higher number of minimally invasive procedures. Oncological outcomes were not different compared to the PR group. The SR group demonstrated better QoL in two out of six items on the EQ-5D-5L test. Conclusions: Stent placement as a bridge-to-surgery strategy is feasible and provides better surgical outcomes in terms of post-operative complications, surgical approach, stoma rate, and QoL. Oncological outcomes were not reported differently, but further studies should be conducted to better evaluate this aspect.

Background: The application of robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has been increasing. However, there is still controversy about whether RA is more feasible than laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO). Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published articles between 2013 and 2025 according to the PRISMA statement and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed, Scholar, and Cochrane databases). Results: Overall, seven studies including 879 patients (RA 358; LA 521) were included. RA might have larger tumor size (MD −0.66, 95% CI −1.18 to 0.13; p < 0.00001) but not for BMI patients (MD −0.24, 95% CI −1.44 to 0.96; p < 0.00001). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative complication, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, transfusion rate, and perioperative hemodynamic outcomes with the exception of a higher lowest systolic blood pressure in the LA group (MD −1.09, 95% CI −2.35 to 0.18; p < 0.00001). Moreover, estimated blood loss (MD 29.52, 95% CI 4.19 to 54.84; p < 0.00001), operative time (MD 3.85, 95% CI −16.11 to 23.80; p < 0.00001), and the length of hospital stay were in favor of RA (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.74; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Both LA and RA are safe and feasible approaches for adrenalectomy in the case of pheochromocytoma. RA seems to have better perioperative results, but further prospective randomized control studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.

Background: The catecholamine-induced hypertensive crisis is a rare, life-threatening condition caused by excessive catecholamine release, often resulting in cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure. Management is challenging, especially when hemodynamic instability persists despite standard medical therapy. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of published articles between 2013 and 2025. The search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed, Scholar and Embase). We also presented a case managed at our reference center. Results: Overall, 42 studies including 69 patients were included. ECMO was the most commonly used modality, often serving as a bridge to surgery. The overall hospital mortality rate was 17.4%. Timing of adrenalectomy varied, with no clear consensus on the optimal approach. We report also a case of a 43-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1 who developed acute cardiogenic shock due to an adrenal paraganglioma. She was supported with ECMO and underwent emergency bowel resection for intestinal ischemia, followed by adrenalectomy. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient died from progressive multiorgan failure. Conclusions: This case highlights the complexity of managing paraganglioma crisis, the potential role of ECMO as a bridge to surgery, and the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary care. Early recognition and referral to specialized centers are essential, though further studies are needed to guide optimal management strategies.