Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm² of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (n = 170) or the PVI-alone group (n = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53–68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42–57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.

Background: Medical image processing has facilitated simulation of 3-dimensional (3-D) corrective osteotomy, and 3-D rapid prototyping technology has further enabled the manufacturing of patient-matched surgical guides and implants (patient-matched instruments, or PMIs). However, 3-D corrective osteotomy using these technologies has not been the standard procedure. We aimed to prospectively verify the efficacy and safety of PMIs in corrective osteotomy for deformities of the upper extremity. Methods: We enrolled 16 patients with a total of 17 bone deformities in the upper extremity. Eight patients had distal radial malunion; 5, distal humeral malunion; and 3, forearm diaphyseal malunion. All cases underwent 3-D corrective osteotomy with PMIs. The primary end point was the residual maximum deformity angle (MDA), which was calculated from 2 deformity angles—1 on the anteroposterior and 1 on the lateral postoperative radiograph. Secondary end points included the deformity angle on radiographs, 3-D error between the preoperative planning model and the postoperative result, range of motion, grip strength, pain measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), patient satisfaction, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Results: The average MDA significantly improved from 25.5° preoperatively to 3.3° at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The angular deformity was within 5° in all cases, except for 1 with distal radial malunion who had a higher angle on the anteroposterior radiograph. The error between the correction seen on the postoperative 3-D bone model and the planned correction was <1° and <1 mm. Flexion and extension of the wrist and pronation of the forearm of the patients treated for distal radial malunion improved significantly, and pronation improved for those treated for forearm diaphyseal malunion. The average VAS score, grip strength, and DASH score significantly improved as well. Of the 16 patients, 15 were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcomes. Conclusions: Corrective osteotomy using PMIs achieved accurate correction and good functional recovery in the upper extremity. Although our study was limited to cases without any deformity on the contralateral side, 3-D corrective osteotomy using PMIs resolved treatment challenges for complex deformities in upper extremities. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background and Objectives Intracranial artery stenosis is the predominant etiology of ischemic stroke in the Asian population. Furthermore, the presence of the RNF213 p.R4810K variant, which is a susceptibility gene for moyamoya disease, increases the risk of ischemic stroke attributable to large-artery atherosclerosis. Accordingly, we hypothesized that this genetic variant may affect the long-term outcome of intracranial artery stenosis in the East Asian population. We thus aimed to examine the effect of this variant on the long-term progression and prognosis of intracranial artery stenosis. Methods Using a prospective database, we identified adult patients with intracranial artery stenosis who underwent periodic MRI examinations for >5 years. We evaluated stenosis progression using a validated visual grading system. We excluded patients diagnosed with moyamoya disease at the time of initial MRI. Genotyping of RNF213 p.R4810K was performed at the end of the follow-up period. Results Among 52 eligible patients, 22 (42%) were carriers of the RNF213 p.R4810K variant. The median follow-up duration was 10.3 years. During the follow-up period, progression of intracranial artery stenosis was observed in 64% variant carriers and 27% noncarriers. There was a significant association of the variant with time to progression of intracranial artery stenosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.31, 95% CI 1.38–7.90, p = 0.007), and time to the composite endpoint of symptomatic stroke and transient ischemic attack (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.15–11.86, p = 0.028), but not to symptomatic stroke alone (HR 2.18, 95% CI 0.62–7.74, p = 0.23). Two variant carriers with progression were newly diagnosed with moyamoya disease. Discussion Our findings indicated that the RNF213 p.R4810K variant increases the risk of intracranial artery stenosis progression.

The impact of changes in nutritional status during hospitalization on prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unknown. We examined the association between changes in the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and prognosis during hospitalization in patients with HFpEF stratified by nutritional status on admission. Nutritional status did and did not worsen in 348 and 349 of 697 patients with high GNRI on admission, and in 142 and 143 of 285 patients with low GNRI on admission, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed no difference in risk of the composite endpoint, all-cause death, or heart failure admission between patients with high GNRI on admission whose nutritional status did and did not worsen. In contrast, patients with low GNRI on admission whose nutritional status did not worsen had a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint and all-cause death than those who did. Multivariable analysis revealed that worsening nutritional status was independently associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint and all-cause mortality in patients with low GNRI on admission. Changes in nutritional status during hospitalization were thus associated with prognosis in patients with malnutrition on admission, but not in patients without malnutrition among those with HFpEF.