Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a histologically and molecularly diverse group of malignancies arising from the gallbladder and the ductal epithelium of the biliary tree. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver malignancy in the United States. Surgical resection with negative margins is the only recognized curative treatment option for iCCA; however, most patients will present with advanced or unresectable disease. The clinical presentation is largely non-specific, with the characteristic symptoms of biliary malignancies being less frequent than extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clinical management in iCCA is heavily influenced by the molecular profile of individual tumors. Hence, pathologists must exercise caution to prevent tissue exhaustion during the diagnostic workup of iCCA and ensure the availability of tissue samples for molecular testing. Establishing standardized procedures for obtaining adequate tissue and using molecular testing is vital. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a potential alternative to tissue-based analysis, especially in cases with insufficient tissue samples. Drugs targeting alterations in NTRK, IDH1, BRAF, FGFR2, and HER2 are commonly utilized. Targeting the MDM2–p53 pathway represents an avenue for future investigations in advanced BTCs. Liver transplantation and locoregional therapies are treatment modalities that may represent curative intent treatments for patients with unresectable disease, and larger explorations are warranted. Akin to HCC, a multidisciplinary team–based approach is essential for patients with BTCs. Through this narrative review of literature, we provide an overview of the current management of iCCA with perspectives regarding future directions in the clinical management of iCCA. We also present patient perspectives regarding the importance of patient advocacy and access to advances in clinical research for patients with BTCs.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Optimal treatment decisions are challenging, and existing treatment allocation frameworks may not fully reflect the evolving therapeutic landscape or contemporary clinical practices in North America. Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 20 North American experts in hepatology, medical oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology developed a consensus-based treatment framework for HCC, termed the BEACON-HCC system. The framework was informed by current evidence and expert opinion through iterative discussion and voting. In a pilot study using 29 real-world patient cases, we assessed concordance between external expert recommendations and BEACON-HCC recommendations and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 2025 treatment recommendations. The BEACON-HCC treatment allocation framework diverges from prior frameworks by incorporating nuanced clinical features such as the degree of intrahepatic tumor burden and vascular invasion, and adverse tumor prognostic markers, to align treatment allocation with tumor biology and therapeutic potential. Key innovations include the incorporation of emerging modalities such as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic–locoregional combination therapies. In the pilot exercise, expert treatment decisions showed 96.6% concordance with BEACON-HCC recommendations and 72.4% concordance with BCLC recommendations. In conclusion, BEACON-HCC is a consensus-based framework for treatment allocation that incorporates the expanding range of therapeutic options available to patients in the North American HCC population. Expert treatment decisions showed a high concordance with the BEACON-HCC system; further validation using empiric clinical data is planned through the HCC-Live Consortium.