Supriya Peshin

Dr. Supriya Peshin

Internal Medicine, Norton Community Hospital, Norton, Massachusetts, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSupriya Peshin
Supriya Peshin
ETEhab Ayman Takrori
Ehab Ayman Takrori
NKNaga Anvesh Kodali
Naga Anvesh Kodali
FBFaizan Bashir
Faizan Bashir
SSSakshi Singal
Sakshi Singal
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a formidable malignancy with rising incidence and dismal long-term survival, largely due to late-stage presentation and intrinsic resistance to therapy. Recent advances in the multidisciplinary management of PDAC have reshaped treatment paradigms across disease stages. For localized disease, innovations in surgical techniques and the adoption of neoadjuvant strategies have improved resection rates and survival outcomes. In metastatic settings, multiagent chemotherapy regimens and precision therapies targeting BRCA mutations and rare gene fusions are expanding treatment options. Immunotherapeutic modalities, including checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies, and mRNA vaccines, show emerging promise despite PDAC’s traditionally immunosuppressive microenvironment. This review synthesizes the current evidence on established therapies and critically evaluates novel and investigational approaches poised to redefine the therapeutic landscape of pancreatic cancer.

9 June 2025 in Hepatology Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RGRushabh Gujarathi
Rushabh Gujarathi
SPSupriya Peshin
Supriya Peshin
XZXuchen Zhang
Xuchen Zhang
MBMelinda Bachini
Melinda Bachini
MMMolly N. Meeks
Molly N. Meeks
APAnjana Pillai
Anjana Pillai
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a histologically and molecularly diverse group of malignancies arising from the gallbladder and the ductal epithelium of the biliary tree. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver malignancy in the United States. Surgical resection with negative margins is the only recognized curative treatment option for iCCA; however, most patients will present with advanced or unresectable disease. The clinical presentation is largely non-specific, with the characteristic symptoms of biliary malignancies being less frequent than extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clinical management in iCCA is heavily influenced by the molecular profile of individual tumors. Hence, pathologists must exercise caution to prevent tissue exhaustion during the diagnostic workup of iCCA and ensure the availability of tissue samples for molecular testing. Establishing standardized procedures for obtaining adequate tissue and using molecular testing is vital. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a potential alternative to tissue-based analysis, especially in cases with insufficient tissue samples. Drugs targeting alterations in NTRK, IDH1, BRAF, FGFR2, and HER2 are commonly utilized. Targeting the MDM2–p53 pathway represents an avenue for future investigations in advanced BTCs. Liver transplantation and locoregional therapies are treatment modalities that may represent curative intent treatments for patients with unresectable disease, and larger explorations are warranted. Akin to HCC, a multidisciplinary team–based approach is essential for patients with BTCs. Through this narrative review of literature, we provide an overview of the current management of iCCA with perspectives regarding future directions in the clinical management of iCCA. We also present patient perspectives regarding the importance of patient advocacy and access to advances in clinical research for patients with BTCs.

14 August 2025 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSupriya Peshin
Supriya Peshin
ADAdit Dharia
Adit Dharia
ETEhab Ayman Takrori
Ehab Ayman Takrori
JKJasmeet Kaur
Jasmeet Kaur
KTKannan Thanikachalam
Kannan Thanikachalam
Renuka IyerRenuka Iyer
Renuka Iyer
Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common yet underrecognized complication of systemic chemotherapy, particularly in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Despite progress in targeted and immune-based therapies, platinum-based and fluoropyrimidine regimens, especially oxaliplatin-containing protocols, remain standard in GI cancer treatment and are linked to high rates of CIT. This complication often leads to treatment delays, dose reductions, and elevated bleeding risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies of CIT in GI malignancies. CIT arises from several mechanisms: direct cytotoxicity to megakaryocyte progenitors, disruption of the marrow microenvironment, thrombopoietin dysregulation, and immune-mediated platelet destruction. Platinum agents, antimetabolites, and immune checkpoint inhibitors can contribute to these effects. Oxaliplatin-induced CIT may occur acutely via immune mechanisms or chronically through marrow suppression. CIT affects 20–25% of solid tumor patients, with highest rates in those receiving gemcitabine (64%), carboplatin (58%), and oxaliplatin (50%). Within GI cancer regimens, FOLFOXIRI and S-1 plus oxaliplatin show higher CIT incidence compared to FOLFIRI and CAPIRI. Thrombocytopenia is graded by severity, from mild (Grade 1–2) to severe (Grade 3–4), and often necessitates treatment adjustments, transfusions, or supportive therapies. Current strategies include chemotherapy dose modification, platelet transfusion, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) like romiplostim and eltrombopag. While platelet transfusions help in acute settings, TPO-RAs may preserve dose intensity and reduce bleeding. Emerging agents targeting megakaryopoiesis and marrow protection offer promising avenues for long-term management.

11 July 2025 in Antibodies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSupriya Peshin
Supriya Peshin
FBFaizan Bashir
Faizan Bashir
NKNaga Anvesh Kodali
Naga Anvesh Kodali
ADAdit Dharia
Adit Dharia
SZSajida Zaiter
Sajida Zaiter
NMNagaishwarya Moka
Nagaishwarya Moka
Immunotherapy has emerged as a transformative approach in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, addressing historically poor survival rates in advanced-stage disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis demonstrate remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), exemplified by trials like NICHE-2 achieving exceptional pathological response rates. However, significant limitations persist, including resistance in some dMMR/MSI-H tumors, minimal efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors, and low overall response rates across most GI malignancies due to tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms. Predictive biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PD-L1 expression are crucial for optimizing patient selection, while hypermutated pMMR tumors with POLE mutations represent emerging therapeutic opportunities. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, where survival remains dismal, combination strategies with chemotherapy and novel approaches like cancer vaccines show promise but lack transformative breakthroughs. Esophagogastric cancers benefit from ICIs combined with chemotherapy, particularly in MSI-H and HER2-positive tumors, while hepatocellular carcinoma has achieved significant progress with combinations like atezolizumab–bevacizumab and durvalumab–tremelimumab surpassing traditional therapies. Biliary tract cancers show modest improvements with durvalumab–chemotherapy combinations. Despite these advances, immunotherapy faces substantial challenges including immune-related adverse events, acquired resistance through cancer immunoediting, and the need for biomarker-driven approaches to overcome tumor microenvironment barriers. This review discusses key clinical trials, therapeutic progress, and emerging modalities including CAR T-cell therapies and combination strategies, emphasizing the critical need to address resistance mechanisms and refine precision medicine approaches to fully realize immunotherapy’s potential in GI malignancies.

5 November 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETEhab Ayman Takrori
Ehab Ayman Takrori
SPSupriya Peshin
Supriya Peshin
SSSakshi Singal
Sakshi Singal
Background: With rising obesity rates, pharmacological interventions are increasingly used in non-diabetic adults. While being effective in managing weight, these agents frequently cause gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, affecting adherence and long-term outcomes. Objective: To systematically evaluate the frequency, severity, and types of GI adverse effects (AEs) associated with anti-obesity medications in obese adults without diabetes. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed, Google Scholar, BMJ, and Web of Science were searched (last search July 2025). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional, and case–control studies. Only reports of GI AEs in non-diabetic adults were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 and Newcastle–Ottawa scales. Results: Out of 733 articles screened, 12 studies met predefined inclusion criteria, including one large cohort of 18,386 participants, along with randomized and observational trials of smaller size. The most frequently reported GI symptoms were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation, predominantly with GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, especially during dose escalation. Orlistat commonly linked to steatorrhea and flatulence, while phentermine was associated with reduced GI motility. Newer agents, including retatrutide and orforglipron, also demonstrated notable GI side effect profiles. Natural products and investigational agents reported fewer adverse events but lacked long-term data and standardized reporting. Limitations: Evidence was limited by heterogeneity in study design and inconsistent reporting of GI outcomes. Conclusion: GI side effects are common across anti-obesity medications, particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists. Although generally mild to moderate, these symptoms can impact adherence and lead to treatment discontinuation. Tailored titration schedules, proactive patient counseling, and standardized adverse event reporting may improve tolerability. Further research is warranted to evaluate long-term GI outcomes and compare safety across emerging pharmacologic agents.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSupriya Peshin
Supriya Peshin
ETEhab Ayman Takrori
Ehab Ayman Takrori
JYJoseph H. Yazji
Joseph H. Yazji
JHJohum Haque
Johum Haque
ADAdit Dharia
Adit Dharia
SSSakshi Singal
Sakshi Singal
The advent of targeted therapies has significantly transformed the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), improving survival across all disease stages. Discoveries of both common and rare oncogenic drivers are advancing rapidly, posing a challenge for clinicians and researchers to remain up to date in this dynamic field. This review highlights the evolving landscape of therapeutic strategies for actionable mutations in lung cancer, with particular attention given to the latest developments in KRAS-targeted treatments including non-G12C mutations, pan-RAS inhibitors, and agents targeting RAS-GTP. We also examine the existing standards of care for NSCLC harboring EGFR and ALK alterations, as well as emerging therapies poised for clinical use. Additional discussion includes advancements in therapies directed at MET, HER2, RET, ROS1, and FGFR alterations—each representing promising targets in NSCLC. This review concludes by exploring the growing evidence surrounding TROP-2 as a novel therapeutic target, especially relevant in cases where previous targeted treatments have failed.