STEFANO POLESELLO

Dr. STEFANO POLESELLO

IRSA-CNR (Water Research Institute)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSara Giordana Rimoldi
Sara Giordana Rimoldi
FSFabrizio Stefani
Fabrizio Stefani
AGAnna Gigantiello
Anna Gigantiello
STEFANO POLESELLOSTEFANO POLESELLO
STEFANO POLESELLO
FCFrancesco Comandatore
Francesco Comandatore
FSFranco Salerno
Franco Salerno

1 June 2015 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSara Valsecchi
Sara Valsecchi
MRMarianna Rusconi
Marianna Rusconi
MMMichela Mazzoni
Michela Mazzoni
GVGaetano Viviano
Gaetano Viviano
RPRomano Pagnotta
Romano Pagnotta
STEFANO POLESELLOSTEFANO POLESELLO
STEFANO POLESELLO

1 May 2018 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSarah Könemann
Sarah Könemann
RKRobert Kase
Robert Kase
ESEszter Simon
Eszter Simon
KSKees Swart
Kees Swart
SBSebastian Buchinger
Sebastian Buchinger
MCMario Carere
Mario Carere

1 June 2021 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RTRikard Tröger
Rikard Tröger
HRHanwei Ren
Hanwei Ren
DYDaqiang Yin
Daqiang Yin
CPCristina Postigo
Cristina Postigo
PNPhuoc Dan Nguyen
Phuoc Dan Nguyen
KWKarin Wiberg
Karin Wiberg
There is growing worry that drinking water can be affected by contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), potentially threatening human health. In this study, a wide range of CECs (n = 177), including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and other compounds, were analysed in raw water and in drinking water collected from drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) in Europe and Asia (n = 13). The impact of human activities was reflected in large numbers of compounds detected (n = 115) and high variation in concentrations in the raw water (range 15-7995 ng L-1 for ∑177CECs). The variation was less pronounced in drinking water, with total concentration ranging from 35 to 919 ng L-1. Treatment efficiency was on average 65 ± 28%, with wide variation between different DWTPs. The DWTP with the highest ∑CEC concentrations in raw water had the most efficient treatment procedure (average treatment efficiency 89%), whereas the DWTP with the lowest ∑177CEC concentration in the raw water had the lowest average treatment efficiency (2.3%). Suspect screening was performed for 500 compounds ranked high as chemicals of concern for drinking water, using a prioritisation tool (SusTool). Overall, 208 features of interest were discovered and three were confirmed with reference standards. There was co-variation between removal efficiency in DWTPs for the target compounds and the suspected features detected using suspect screening, implying that removal of known contaminants can be used to predict overall removal of potential CECs for drinking water production. Our results can be of high value for DWTPs around the globe in their planning for future treatment strategies to meet the increasing concern about human exposure to unknown CECs present in their drinking water.

1 February 2017 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSara Valsecchi
Sara Valsecchi
DCDaniela Conti
Daniela Conti
RCRiccardo Crebelli
Riccardo Crebelli
STEFANO POLESELLOSTEFANO POLESELLO
STEFANO POLESELLO
MRMarianna Rusconi
Marianna Rusconi
FAFiorella Aste
Fiorella Aste

30 October 2012 in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVSara Valsecchi
Sara Valsecchi
MRMarianna Rusconi
Marianna Rusconi
STEFANO POLESELLOSTEFANO POLESELLO
STEFANO POLESELLO