Erdita Cenameri

Mrs. Erdita Cenameri


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 November 2024 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBlerina Zeza
Blerina Zeza
NKNisrina Kraja
Nisrina Kraja
Valbona DishaValbona Disha
Valbona Disha
ECErdita Cenameri
Erdita Cenameri
EBEsat Bardhoshi
Esat Bardhoshi
Objectives: The paper aims to assess the level of antibiotic use and the antibiotic types used generally in dentistry and identify self-reported allergies and resistance related to them. Methods: The data were collected between March and May 2024 via an electronic questionnaire on self-reported antibiotic usage, antibiotic allergies and resistances among individual in Albania. Results: A total of 477 individuals (83% females, 17% males) with a mean 33 ± 13 (min 17; max 73) years of age completed the questionnaire. Overall, 88% of the population reported having used antibiotics before the questionnaire, among whom 56% used them for dental reasons. An average of 5% reported being allergic, mainly to the penicillin group, while 5% claimed to have undergone an antibiogram analysis before taking the prescribed antibiotics, with most of them showing resistance to the penicillin group. Conclusions: Based on the findings of this study, the high prevalence of antibiotics usage in dentistry encourages further deepening studies and training adapting global guidelines for antibiotics indications in dentistry to the level of antibiotics allergies and resistances of this specific country.

2 October 2026 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBlerina Zeza
Blerina Zeza
JSJorida Shahinas
Jorida Shahinas
ECErdita Cenameri
Erdita Cenameri
KSKlodiana Spahiu
Klodiana Spahiu
DMDoris Mingomataj
Doris Mingomataj
EIEvisa Isufaj
Evisa Isufaj
This narrative review examines the role of psychological stress in periodontal disease and evaluates the evidence supporting stress-informed lifestyle and behavioural interventions within a proposed theoretical framework for stress reduction/regulation. The framework includes slow diaphragmatic breathing, positive psychological approaches, mindfulness and meditation, physical activity and stretching, appropriate daylight or sun exposure, and nutrition. For each domain, evidence is considered in relation to stress regulation, mechanistic relevance to periodontal health, and, where available, direct periodontal outcomes. The available evidence varies considerably across domains and is frequently indirect. The proposed framework represents a structured approach to stress management in periodontal care and requires prospective clinical testing to determine its feasibility, effectiveness, and potential impact on periodontal treatment outcomes.

24 December 2024 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBlerina Zeza
Blerina Zeza
BOBlerina Osmani
Blerina Osmani
ECErdita Cenameri
Erdita Cenameri
BEBüşra EMİR
Büşra EMİR
Background/Objectives: Oral hygiene is a key factor for dental and periodontal diseases and the prognosis of any treatment to restore their consequences. The present survey aimed to evaluate how well informed patients in Albania are on oral hygiene, given the scarce evidence on this topic. Methods: This survey was performed using a Google Forms questionnaire on oral hygiene habits, type and technique of instruments used, and frequency of dental recall visits. Results: A total of 1006 questionnaires were filled in a one-month time period (January 2020) from a population of 75.2% females and 24.8% males, 32.7 ± 11.3 years of age, from whom 94.6% reported a lack of systemic diseases and 80% were non-smokers. All of the population brushed their teeth at least once daily. The most used type of toothbrush was a manual one (91.1%) with medium-bristle hardness in 71% of cases. The most prevalent way of using the toothbrush was through circular movements (36.7%) with a duration of 2–3 min in 72% of the population. Only 77.1% of the population used interdental instruments, mainly interdental floss. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, it could be concluded that the present population seemed to be mostly appropriately informed, but the information needs further revision and promotion by dentists.