An offshore wind measurement campaign using vertical light detection and ranging (LiDAR) devices was conducted at the Hazaki Oceanographic Research Station (HORS) as part of an investigation into determining the optimal distance from the coast for a nearshore wind farm from a meteorological perspective. The research platform was a 427 m long pier located on a rectilinear coastline on the Pacific coast of the central Honshu Island in Japan. The relationship between the ratios of the increase of wind speed near the surface and fetch length within 5 km of the coast was analyzed via LiDAR observations taken at heights from 40 to 200 m. The results showed that the speed of the coastal wind blowing from land to sea gradually increased as the fetch length increased, by approximately 15–20% at 50 m above sea level around a fetch length of 2 km. Moreover, empirical equations were derived by applying the power law to the relationship between the increase of wind speed and fetch lengths at 1–5 km, as obtained from the LiDAR measurements. It was also found that the wind speed increase at a 2 km fetch length was equivalent to the effect of a 50–90 m vertical height increase on the coast in this region.

In order to improve the accuracy of the wind speed simulated by a mesoscale model for the wind resource assessment in coastal areas, this study evaluated the effectiveness of using the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)’s latest and finest (2 km × 2 km) grid point value (GPV) data, produced from the local forecast model (LFM) as input data to the mesoscale model. The evaluation was performed using wind lidar measurements at two sites located on the coasts of the Sea of Japan and Pacific Ocean. The accuracy of the LFM–GPV was first compared with that of two products from the JMA Meso Scale Model (MSM) (5 km × 5 km): MSM-GPV and mesoscale analysis (MANAL). Consequently, it was shown that LFM–GPV exhibited the most accurate wind speeds against lidar measurements. Next, dynamical downscaling simulations were performed using the weather research and forecasting model (WRF) forced by the three datasets above, and their results were compared. As compared to the GPVs, it was found that the WRF dynamical downscaling simulation using them as input can improve the accuracy of the coastal wind speeds. This was attributed to the advantage of the WRF simulation to improve the negative bias from the input data, especially for the winds blowing from the sea sectors. It was also found that even if the LFM–GPV is used as an input to the WRF simulation, it does not always reproduce more accurate wind speeds, as compared to the simulations using the other two datasets. This result is partly owing to the tendency of WRF to overestimate the wind speed over land, thus obscuring the higher accuracy of the LFM–GPV. It was also shown that the overestimation tendency cannot be improved by only changing the nudging methods or the planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF. These results indicate that it may be difficult to utilize the LFM–GPV in the WRF wind simulation, unless the overestimation tendency of WRF itself is improved first.

We analysed wind speed and direction off the coast of Japan using data from the satellite-borne Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) and the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF), validated these data using in situ wind measurements from 20 buoys, and evaluated the effect of the long time intervals from ASCAT observations on wind resource assessment. More than 25 km from the coast, and at heights of 10 m, the ASCAT wind speed has negative biases of up to 3.4% and root mean square errors of up to 18.5%; its wind direction has 11° to 27° of mean absolute error compared to buoy measurements at a height of 10 m. These accuracies are better than either the expected accuracies reported in the technical manual or those simulated with WRF with its spatial resolution of 10 km. We also evaluated long-term average ASCAT wind speeds in comparison to 4- and 5-year averages of in situ buoy wind speeds measured at three buoys, with resulting differences of –0.3%, –6.3%, and – 1.6%. Furthermore, wind roses show that appearance frequencies of the ASCAT wind direction for the long term are in a good agreement with those of the measurements at the three buoys. Our results show that the ASCAT-derived wind speed and direction are appropriate more than 25 km from the coast, and that the long time interval between ASCAT observations has an insignificant effect on wind resource assessment, if at least 4 or 5 years of averaged ASCAT data are used.

In the present study, a new geophysical model function (GMF) is developed for the X-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) on board the Advanced Satellite with New System Architecture for Observation-2 (ASNARO-2) to retrieve accurate offshore wind speeds. Equivalent neutral wind speeds based on the local forecast model (LFM) are employed as reference wind vectors, and 12,259 matching points from 502 SAR images obtained with horizontal transmitting, horizontal receiving polarization around Japan are collected. To ensure convergence of the calculation, 8129 points are selected from the matching points to determine the basic formula for the GMF and 23 coefficients based on the relationships among the normalized radar cross section, wind speed, incidence angle, and relative wind direction. Compared with the reference wind speeds, the GMF wind speeds showed reproducibility with a bias of −0.10 m/s and an RMSD of 1.37 m/s. Additionally, it can be confirmed that the retrieved wind speed has the bias of 0.03 and the RMSD of 1.68 m/s when compared to the in situ wind speed from the Kuroshio Extension Observatory (KEO) buoy. The accuracy of these retrieved wind speeds is comparable to previous studies, and it is indicated that the developed GMF can be used to retrieve offshore winds from ASNARO-2 images.

It is well known that microwave satellites can retrieve sea surface wind speeds at a height of 10 m above the sea level. In fact, such kind of wind information is used as initial and boundary values in simulations for daily weather forecasts. However, the wind vectors are only retrieved at 10 m height, and the application is limited. In this study, several methods are presented to use the retrieved wind speeds from satellite-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to convert wind speeds at 10 m height to wind speeds at tens to hundreds of meters height, and to clarify their applicability by comparing dual scanning Light Detection and Ranging（LiDAR）observations and numerical simulations, the Local forecast Model (LFM) of the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) and the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) around Japanese coastal waters. In particular, the hub heights required for offshore wind generation are the target of this study.There are three target areas, Isumi, Ishikari and Saikai. The wind speeds at 10 m height retrieved from the Sentinel-1 SAR, which is operated by the European Space Agency (ESA), are converted to wind speeds to hub height using three methods based on the logarithmic wind law, the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) and the differences (or ratios) between the wind speeds at 10 m height and those at hub heights from LFM and WRF, respectively. The results at Isumi showed that the biases of the SAR wind speed at 30 m height are 1.50 m/s and 1.27 m/s from the logarithmic law and MOST, respectively, compared to wind speeds from the LiDAR observation. The Root Mean Square Errors (RMSEs) of the SAR wind speeds are 2.97 m/s and 2.67 m/s, respectively. The results show that the correction for atmospheric stability is effective. On the other hand, the bias and RMSE when using wind differences between 10 m and 30 m heights are 0.70 m/s and 2.39 m/s, respectively. These bias and RMSE are lower than the previous two methods. It is suggested that the wind speed difference method may convert the SAR wind speed at 10 m height to hub height with higher accuracy.This study will be further validated for other areas to determine the optimal method and its accuracy.