Teruo Ohsawa

Prof. Dr. Teruo Ohsawa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSusumu Shimada
Susumu Shimada
JGJay Prakash Goit
Jay Prakash Goit
TOTeruo Ohsawa
Teruo Ohsawa
TKTetsuya Kogaki
Tetsuya Kogaki
SNSatoshi Nakamura
Satoshi Nakamura
A wind measurement campaign using a single scanning light detection and ranging (LiDAR) device was conducted at the Hazaki Oceanographical Research Station (HORS) on the Hazaki coast of Japan to evaluate the performance of the device for coastal wind measurements. The scanning LiDAR was deployed on the landward end of the HORS pier. We compared the wind speed and direction data recorded by the scanning LiDAR to the observations obtained from a vertical profiling LiDAR installed at the opposite end of the pier, 400 m from the scanning LiDAR. The best practice for offshore wind measurements using a single scanning LiDAR was evaluated by comparing results from a total of nine experiments using several different scanning settings. A two-parameter velocity volume processing (VVP) method was employed to retrieve the horizontal wind speed and direction from the radial wind speed. Our experiment showed that, at the current offshore site with a negligibly small vertical wind speed component, the accuracy of the scanning LiDAR wind speeds and directions was sensitive to the azimuth angle setting, but not to the elevation angle setting. In addition to the validations for the 10-minute mean wind speeds and directions, the application of LiDARs for the measurement of the turbulence intensity (TI) was also discussed by comparing the results with observations obtained from a sonic anemometer, mounted at the seaward end of the HORS pier, 400 m from the scanning LiDAR. The standard deviation obtained from the scanning LiDAR measurement showed a greater fluctuation than that obtained from the sonic anemometer measurement. However, the difference between the scanning LiDAR and sonic measurements appeared to be within an acceptable range for the wind turbine design. We discuss the variations in data availability and accuracy based on an analysis of the carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) distribution and the goodness of fit for curve fitting via the VVP method.

19 April 2013 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YTYuko Takeyama
Yuko Takeyama
TOTeruo Ohsawa
Teruo Ohsawa
KKKatsutoshi Kozai
Katsutoshi Kozai
CHCharlotte Hasager
Charlotte Hasager
MBMerete Badger
Merete Badger
This work discusses the accuracies of geophysical model functions (GMFs) for retrieval of sea surface wind speed from satellite-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images in Japanese coastal waters characterized by short fetches and variable atmospheric stability conditions. In situ observations from two validation sites, Hiratsuka and Shirahama, are used for comparison of the retrieved sea surface wind speeds using CMOD (C-band model)4, CMOD_IFR2, CMOD5 and CMOD5.N. Of all the geophysical model functions (GMFs), the latest C-band GMF, CMOD5.N, has the smallest bias and root mean square error at both sites. All of the GMFs exhibit a negative bias in the retrieved wind speed. In order to understand the reason for this bias, all SAR-retrieved wind speeds are separated into two categories: onshore wind (blowing from sea to land) and offshore wind (blowing from land to sea). Only offshore winds were found to exhibit the large negative bias, and short fetches from the coastline may be a possible reason for this. Moreover, it is clarified that in both the unstable and stable conditions, CMOD5.N has atmospheric stability effectiveness, and can keep the same accuracy with CMOD5 in the neutral condition. In short, at the moment, CMOD5.N is thought to be the most promising GMF for the SAR wind speed retrieval with the atmospheric stability correction in Japanese coastal waters, although there is ample room for future improvement for the effect from short fetch.

5 September 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSusumu Shimada
Susumu Shimada
YTYuko Takeyama
Yuko Takeyama
TKTetsuya Kogaki
Tetsuya Kogaki
TOTeruo Ohsawa
Teruo Ohsawa
SNSatoshi Nakamura
Satoshi Nakamura
An offshore wind measurement campaign using vertical light detection and ranging (LiDAR) devices was conducted at the Hazaki Oceanographic Research Station (HORS) as part of an investigation into determining the optimal distance from the coast for a nearshore wind farm from a meteorological perspective. The research platform was a 427 m long pier located on a rectilinear coastline on the Pacific coast of the central Honshu Island in Japan. The relationship between the ratios of the increase of wind speed near the surface and fetch length within 5 km of the coast was analyzed via LiDAR observations taken at heights from 40 to 200 m. The results showed that the speed of the coastal wind blowing from land to sea gradually increased as the fetch length increased, by approximately 15–20% at 50 m above sea level around a fetch length of 2 km. Moreover, empirical equations were derived by applying the power law to the relationship between the increase of wind speed and fetch lengths at 1–5 km, as obtained from the LiDAR measurements. It was also found that the wind speed increase at a 2 km fetch length was equivalent to the effect of a 50–90 m vertical height increase on the coast in this region.

18 July 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTakeshi Misaki
Takeshi Misaki
TOTeruo Ohsawa
Teruo Ohsawa
MKMizuki Konagaya
Mizuki Konagaya
SSSusumu Shimada
Susumu Shimada
YTYuko Takeyama
Yuko Takeyama
SNSatoshi Nakamura
Satoshi Nakamura
In order to improve the accuracy of the wind speed simulated by a mesoscale model for the wind resource assessment in coastal areas, this study evaluated the effectiveness of using the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)’s latest and finest (2 km × 2 km) grid point value (GPV) data, produced from the local forecast model (LFM) as input data to the mesoscale model. The evaluation was performed using wind lidar measurements at two sites located on the coasts of the Sea of Japan and Pacific Ocean. The accuracy of the LFM–GPV was first compared with that of two products from the JMA Meso Scale Model (MSM) (5 km × 5 km): MSM-GPV and mesoscale analysis (MANAL). Consequently, it was shown that LFM–GPV exhibited the most accurate wind speeds against lidar measurements. Next, dynamical downscaling simulations were performed using the weather research and forecasting model (WRF) forced by the three datasets above, and their results were compared. As compared to the GPVs, it was found that the WRF dynamical downscaling simulation using them as input can improve the accuracy of the coastal wind speeds. This was attributed to the advantage of the WRF simulation to improve the negative bias from the input data, especially for the winds blowing from the sea sectors. It was also found that even if the LFM–GPV is used as an input to the WRF simulation, it does not always reproduce more accurate wind speeds, as compared to the simulations using the other two datasets. This result is partly owing to the tendency of WRF to overestimate the wind speed over land, thus obscuring the higher accuracy of the LFM–GPV. It was also shown that the overestimation tendency cannot be improved by only changing the nudging methods or the planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF. These results indicate that it may be difficult to utilize the LFM–GPV in the WRF wind simulation, unless the overestimation tendency of WRF itself is improved first.

27 June 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SUShogo Uchiyama
Shogo Uchiyama
TOTeruo Ohsawa
Teruo Ohsawa
HAHiroshi Asou
Hiroshi Asou
MKMizuki Konagaya
Mizuki Konagaya
TMTakeshi Misaki
Takeshi Misaki
KHKohei Hamada
Kohei Hamada
Floating LiDAR systems (FLSs) may replace conventional offshore met masts, and they have been developed well in Europe. However, before using them in Japan, we must determine whether they demonstrate the same performance under the unique East-Asian meteorological and oceanographic conditions. Therefore, herein, we investigate the performance of FLSs by focusing on the differences among models. Four independent wind datasets from three FLSs were simultaneously verified against a reference met mast and vertical LiDAR at a Japanese site. The data availability was confirmed to vary from 62.7 to 98.0% over the period at 63 m. This was strongly affected by the system availability of the buoy and LiDAR, suggesting that buoy system robustness is key to better campaigns with higher data availability. The 10 min averaged wind speed and direction largely satisfied the Carbon Trust’s key performance indicators, with a low sensitivity to wave conditions depending on the buoy shape. The standard deviation of the wind speed and turbulence intensity had poorer accuracy than that of the 10 min averaged statistics because of the wave-induced buoy motion, especially for small buoys. In short, this paper provides an overview of a measurement by FLS in Japan. Also, the unique verification with multiple units suggests the need for a low-motion buoy or motion compensation to improve the measurement accuracy of the turbulence component.

5 June 2025 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMizuki Konagaya
Mizuki Konagaya
TOTeruo Ohsawa
Teruo Ohsawa
YIYuki Itoshima
Yuki Itoshima
MKMasaki Kambayashi
Masaki Kambayashi
ELEdouard Leonard
Edouard Leonard
KHKohei Hamada
Kohei Hamada
This study aims to estimate nearshore wind conditions using multiple numerical models and evaluate their accuracy at heights relevant to offshore wind turbines. An intensive observation campaign was conducted from December 2021 to February 2022 at Mutsu Ogawara Port, Japan. The observed data were used to validate the accuracy of numerical models (mesoscale, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and linear models) to estimate wind conditions and investigate thermal environments, including atmospheric stability. The results demonstrated that the accuracy of period-averaged wind speed estimation in the offshore direction improved significantly when using an offshore observation point as a reference, with biases within ±2.5% up to 5 km offshore for all models. However, the accuracy of vertical shear estimation varies widely among models, with several models overestimating vertical shear, particularly in the sea wind sector. The mesoscale model, which accounts for spatiotemporal variations in atmospheric stability, consistently achieves high estimation accuracy. In contrast, standalone CFD models, which typically assume neutral atmospheric stability, are difficult to estimate accurately. Nonetheless, incorporating specific atmospheric stability conditions into the CFD models significantly enhanced their accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of atmospheric stability when estimating offshore wind conditions, particularly in nearshore areas.