Diana Nonković

Dr. Diana Nonković

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2023 in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTChristos Thomadakis
Christos Thomadakis
IGIlias Gountas
Ilias Gountas
EDErika Duffell
Erika Duffell
KGKonstantinos Gountas
Konstantinos Gountas
BBBenjamin Bluemel
Benjamin Bluemel
Georgios NikolopoulosGeorgios Nikolopoulos
Georgios Nikolopoulos
Epidemiological data are crucial to monitoring progress towards the 2030 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) elimination targets. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of chronic HCV infection (cHCV) in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) countries in 2019. Multi-parameter evidence synthesis (MPES) was used to produce national estimates of cHCV defined as: π = πrecρrec + πexρex + πnonρnon; πrec, πex, and πnon represent cHCV prevalence among recent people who inject drugs (PWID), ex-PWID, and non-PWID, respectively, while ρrec, ρex, and ρnon represent the proportions of these groups in the population. Information sources included the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) national operational contact points (NCPs) and prevalence database, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction databases, and the published literature. The cHCV prevalence in 29 of 30 EU/EEA countries in 2019 was 0.50% [95% Credible Interval (CrI): 0.46%, 0.55%]. The highest cHCV prevalence was observed in the eastern EU/EEA (0.88%; 95% CrI: 0.81%, 0.94%). At least 35.76% (95% CrI: 33.07%, 38.60%) of the overall cHCV prevalence in EU/EEA countries was associated with injecting drugs. Using MPES and collaborating with ECDC NCPs, we estimated the prevalence of cHCV in the EU/EEA to be low. Some areas experience higher cHCV prevalence while a third of prevalent cHCV infections was attributed to PWID. Further efforts are needed to scale up prevention measures and the diagnosis and treatment of infected individuals, especially in the east of the EU/EEA and among PWID. 10.13039/501100000805 ECDC .

22 February 2025 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DNDiana Nonković
Diana Nonković
VTVanja Tesic
Vanja Tesic
Vida ŠimatVida Šimat
Vida Šimat
SKSvjetlana Karabuva
Svjetlana Karabuva
AMAlan Medić
Alan Medić
Jerko HrabarJerko Hrabar
Jerko Hrabar
Fish and seafood are increasingly recognised as safe and nutritiously valuable foods of animal origin, being a source of about 17% of animal protein globally. Novel culinary trends encourage the consumption of raw or thermally lightly processed fishery products. At the same time, consumers prefer wild, fresh and whole fish over farmed or processed fish. However, the consumption of raw or undercooked fish and other marine organisms poses a risk of contracting parasitic infections, potentially representing a public health risk. Among the most common seafoodborne parasites are members of the Anisakidae family, especially the genus Anisakis, which can cause potentially detrimental effects to human health. These parasites are the causative agent of a zoonosis termed anisakidosis that is prevalent in countries with high per capita fish consumption. Although the number of annual clinical cases varies among countries and regions and is generally not high, sensitisation to this parasite in the general population seems to be considerably higher. Therefore, anisakidosis is still significantly underreported and misdiagnosed globally, making it a disease of rising public health concerns. To prevent infection and mitigate potential negative effects on human health, proper preventive measures such as gutting the fish, freezing or thermal processing are needed. Moreover, a holistic approach implementing One Health principles together with educational campaigns towards the general public and primary care physicians can extend the knowledge on the occurrence of these parasites in their natural hosts and the diagnosis and incidence of anisakidosis, with a final goal to minimize risks for human health and reducing costs for health systems.

23 November 2023 in Eurosurveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAngela Mary Rose
Angela Mary Rose
NNNathalie Nicolay
Nathalie Nicolay
VMVirginia Sandonis Martín
Virginia Sandonis Martín
CMClara Mazagatos
Clara Mazagatos
GPGoranka Petrović
Goranka Petrović
SKSvjetlana Karabuva
Svjetlana Karabuva
Introduction: The I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital networks have been measuring COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in participating European countries since early 2021. Aim: We aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in patients ≥ 20 years hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) from December 2021 to July 2022 (Omicron-dominant period). Methods: In both networks, 46 hospitals (13 countries) follow a similar test-negative case–control protocol. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) and first booster dose vaccination as last dose of either vaccine received ≥ 14 days before symptom onset (stratifying first booster into received < 150 and ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose). We measured VE overall, by vaccine category/product, age group and time since first mRNA booster dose, adjusting by site as a fixed effect, and by swab date, age, sex, and presence/absence of at least one commonly collected chronic condition. Results: We included 2,779 cases and 2,362 controls. The VE of all vaccine products combined against hospitalisation for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was 43% (95% CI: 29–54) for complete PSV (with last dose received ≥ 150 days before onset), while it was 59% (95% CI: 51–66) after addition of one booster dose. The VE was 85% (95% CI: 78–89), 70% (95% CI: 61–77) and 36% (95% CI: 17–51) for those with onset 14–59 days, 60–119 days and 120–179 days after booster vaccination, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, during the Omicron period, observed VE against SARI hospitalisation improved with first mRNA booster dose, particularly for those having symptom onset < 120 days after first booster dose.

2 March 2025 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlan Medić
Alan Medić
Vladimir SavicVladimir Savic
Vladimir Savic
AKAna Klobucar
Ana Klobucar
MBMaja Bogdanic
Maja Bogdanic
MPMarcela Curman Posavec
Marcela Curman Posavec
Tatjana Vilibic-CavlekTatjana Vilibic-Cavlek
Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek
Autochthonous dengue cases have been continuously recorded in Europe in the past two decades. The first autochthonous dengue case in Croatia was reported in 2010 on the Pelješac Peninsula, while imported cases were recorded continuously thereafter. In 2024, dengue re-emerged in Croatia. An epidemiological and entomological study was conducted after receiving information on dengue virus (DENV) infection in a German tourist probably acquired on Dugi Otok Island in Croatia in May 2024. Serum samples were collected from 30 residents of the Veli Rat region where the patient had stayed. In addition, mosquitoes were collected in the same area. Human samples were tested for the presence of DENV antibodies (ELISA and IFA) and DENV RNA (RT-qPCR), while mosquito samples were tested for DENV RNA (RT-qPCR). DENV IgM or IgG antibodies were found in 8 serum samples, while no one sample was RT-qPCR positive. No cross-reactivity with flaviviruses was detected in seropositive samples, supporting DENV infection. One patient was classified as a confirmed dengue case (IgG seroconversion in paired serum samples) and five as probable cases (IgM detection in a single serum sample). One additional patient, sampled only once, was IgG seropositive. Two of the seropositive individuals reported fever and rash three weeks before testing. The re-emergence of dengue in Croatia highlights the need for continuous monitoring of DENV circulation in both humans and vectors.

23 November 2023 in Eurosurveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ARAngela Mary Rose
Angela Mary Rose
NNNathalie Nicolay
Nathalie Nicolay
VMVirginia Sandonis Martín
Virginia Sandonis Martín
CMClara Mazagatos
Clara Mazagatos
GPGoranka Petrović
Goranka Petrović
SKSvjetlana Karabuva
Svjetlana Karabuva
Introduction Two large multicentre European hospital networks have estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 since 2021. Aim We aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) patients ≥ 20 years, combining data from these networks during Alpha (March–June)- and Delta (June–December)-dominant periods, 2021. Methods Forty-six participating hospitals across 14 countries follow a similar generic protocol using the test-negative case–control design. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) as two doses of a two-dose or one of a single-dose vaccine ≥ 14 days before onset. Results We included 1,087 cases (538 controls) and 1,669 cases (1,442 controls) in the Alpha- and Delta-dominant periods, respectively. During the Alpha period, VE against hospitalisation with SARS-CoV2 for complete Comirnaty PSV was 85% (95% CI: 69–92) overall and 75% (95% CI: 42–90) in those aged ≥ 80 years. During the Delta period, among SARI patients ≥ 20 years with symptom onset ≥ 150 days from last PSV dose, VE for complete Comirnaty PSV was 54% (95% CI: 18–74). Among those receiving Comirnaty PSV and mRNA booster (any product) ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose, VE was 91% (95% CI: 57–98). In time-since-vaccination analysis, complete all-product PSV VE was > 90% in those with their last dose < 90 days before onset; ≥ 70% in those 90–179 days before onset. Conclusions Our results from this EU multi-country hospital setting showed that VE for complete PSV alone was higher in the Alpha- than the Delta-dominant period, and addition of a first booster dose during the latter period increased VE to over 90%.

15 April 2024 in Infektološki glasnik
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
INIvica Nekić
Ivica Nekić
AMAlan Medić
Alan Medić
DPDinko Puntarić
Dinko Puntarić
TBTatjana Nemeth Blažić
Tatjana Nemeth Blažić
NLNataša Lisica-Šikić
Nataša Lisica-Šikić
BDBoris Dželalija
Boris Dželalija
We present a retrospective research of HPV testing of tissue samples, by the polymerase chain reaction method (PCR), in patients that underwent surgery due to squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx or larynx in Zadar General Hospital in the period from 2007 to 2016.Out of 99 patients included in this study, 89 (89,9%) were men with median age of 62.3 years and ten (10,1 %) were women with median age of 66 years. According to the cancer site, the percentage of HPV positive carcinoma tissue samples of larynx carcinoma, oral cavity carcinoma and oropharyngeal carcinoma were 25.8%, 26.9% and 18,2 %, respectively. According to the HPV genotype, among all cancer sites, in 60% (n=15) HPV 16 were detected, and in 40% mixed HPV infection, that is, in 32% (n=8) HPV 16, 26, 34, 53 and in 8% (n=2) HPV 16, 18, 26, 34, 53.The presented research results support the need for stronger public health promotion of vaccines against HPV, and the selection of the best strategy for the implementation of vaccination to prevent cancer of the larynx, oropharynx and oral cavity among men.