Active participation in social activities is important for the wellbeing of older adults. This study explored benefits of active social engagement by evaluating whether relationships that comprise active involvement (e.g.co-engagement in activities) bring more social benefits (i.e.social support, companionship, positive social influence) than other relationships that do not involve co-engagement. A total of 133 adults ages 60 years and older living in a rural Midwestern city in the United States of America were interviewed once and provided information on 1,740 social network members. Among 1,506 social relationships in which interactions occurred at least once a month, 52 per cent involved engagement in social activities together and 35 per cent involved eating together regularly. Results of the generalised linear mixed model showed that relationships involving co-engagement were significantly more likely to also convey social support (i.e.emotional, instrumental, informational), companionship and social influence (encouragement for healthy behaviours) than relationships that do not involve co-engagement. Having more network members who provide companionship was associated with higher sense of environmental mastery, positive relations with others and satisfaction with social network. Interventions may focus on maintaining and developing such social relationships and ensuring the presence of social settings in which co-engagement can occur. Future research may explore whether increasing co-engagement leads to an enhanced sense of companionship and psychological wellbeing.

In the United States of America (USA), older adults in rural areas are at increased risk for adverse outcomes of disasters, partly due to medical needs, limited or long geographic distances from community resources, and less knowledge and motivation about preparedness steps. Older residents and ageing service providers in a rural community in the USA were interviewed regarding their perceptions about disasters and preparedness, and their reactions to the preparedness training programme using the concepts of the Extended Parallel Process Model. Participants generally indicated low motivation to engage in preparedness behaviours despite perceptions of personal risk and beliefs that preparedness behaviours were easy and could improve disaster outcomes. A theme of social relationships emerged from the data, with participants identifying social relationships as resources, barriers and motivators. People surrounding older adults can support or deter their preparedness behaviours, and sometimes elicit a desire to protect the wellbeing of others. Findings suggest two potential strategies to facilitate preparedness behaviours by moving beyond personal benefits: highlighting older adults' increased ability to protect the wellbeing of younger generations and their community by being prepared themselves, and engaging family, friends and neighbours in preparedness programmes to enhance the resilience of their social groups. Older adults in many cultures have a desire to contribute to their society. Novel and effective approaches to increase preparedness could target their social groups.

Objective: Personal disaster and emergency support networks of rural older adults are described before and after participation in a disaster preparedness intervention, PrepWise.Methods: At baseline, a total of 194 disaster support network members were identified by 27 older adults in a rural Midwest community. After the intervention, these participants identified 232 support network members. Multilevel logistic regression models were constructed to identify characteristics of the network members and social interactions associated with support providers at baseline as well as newly added support sources after the PrepWise intervention.Results: Member and interaction characteristics associated with being identified as emergency support sources at baseline were as follows: family, lived in close proximity, weekly or more frequent contact, and being someone whom participants shared concerns with, trusted, and exchanged emotional support with. After receiving PrepWise, participants on average identified 3 new sources of emergency support within their networks. Support sources added at follow-up tended to be nonfamily members and those participants trusted.Conclusions: Enhancements in personal emergency support networks occurred after the intervention. Understanding characteristics of the network members and social interactions may assist in identifying additional emergency support sources. Larger studies investigating the impacts of enhanced support networks on disaster-related behaviors and outcomes will be beneficial. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:110–119)

Perceptions about family members not contributing enough to caregiving are documented to create psychological stress among caregivers. This study investigated whether individuals’ perception that family members are under-contributing in caregiving processes was associated with their psychological well-being and explored the factors that may contribute to such perception borrowing concepts from a previous study: malfeasance, nonfeasance, and uplift. Seventy-two members of 30 families recruited through residential and adult daycare settings provided information about 960 familial network members (e.g., family, friends). Perceived levels of participation in caregiving about each network member, whether the level met respondents’ expectations, and interactions representing malfeasance, nonfeasance, and uplift were assessed. Number of family members respondents identified as under-contributing in caregiving was associated with higher, whereas numbers of family participating in caregiving and supportive staff were associated with lower distress (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]). Factor analyses identified a set of social interactions among familial network members capturing three constructs: malfeasance, nonfeasance, and uplift. Network members for whom respondents reported higher levels of nonfeasance were more likely to be identified as under-contributing in direct care (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92), care decision making (OR = 1.89), and social support (OR = 1.74) compared with those identified as contributing enough. Members with higher levels of malfeasance were more likely to be identified as under-contributing in direct care (OR = 1.19) than those identified as contributing enough. Social interactions characterized as nonfeasance may explain the perception of unmet expectations in caregiving within families and may represent a potential focus of family-level interventions.